ChaseDream

标题: [注意]中欧的实际薪水约=FT排名薪水/4,因为考虑到购买力等因素。 [打印本页]

作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-1-24 17:36
标题: [注意]中欧的实际薪水约=FT排名薪水/4,因为考虑到购买力等因素。
不好意思,来灌点凉水。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-24 20:49:32编辑过]

作者: marshial    时间: 2005-1-24 17:39

应该是这个数吧。


作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-25 13:32
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-24 17:36:00的发言:
不好意思,来灌点凉水。


in this case, the ranking should be divided by 4? then equal to No.5
作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-1-25 14:00

To CEIBS_MBA2005

兄弟讲话可真幽默!不过我讲得可是真正的内幕实事啊。不过也是公开的。


作者: usdusaj    时间: 2005-1-25 17:49

因该不会。我们的毕业生现在都有25万左右。3年前的学生的平均工资应该

比才毕业的人高把。


作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-25 17:56
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-25 14:00:00的发言:

To CEIBS_MBA2005


兄弟讲话可真幽默!不过我讲得可是真正的内幕实事啊。不过也是公开的。



Then how do you guarantee that other oversea business schools listed in the top level have nothing to be hidden? Have nothing to be withdrawn from public attention? what you referred to was not that CEIBS submitted its application docutments to the committee different from the committee whom the other oversea BS's submitted the exact same stuffs to? If not, all right, considering that both CEIBS and other oversea BS's had the same committee, what the hell made you guys think that the committee showed the preference for CEIBS?


作者: 山水郎    时间: 2005-1-25 20:47

PPP (RMB : International Dollar) = 4.565:1


Source: World Bank Website


Based on FT data, annual package is around RMB 447K. It seems reasonable.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-25 20:47:53编辑过]

作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-1-26 02:07

To 山水郎

你说得很对,就是PPP!

希望没有冒犯CEIBS_MBA2005及其Ceibs的拥护者,当然我承认CEIBS是一流的商学院。


作者: CKGSB_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-26 08:10

引用"Then how do you guarantee that other oversea business schools listed in the top level have nothing to be hidden? Have nothing to be withdrawn from public attention? what you referred to was not that CEIBS submitted its application docutments to the committee different from the committee whom the other oversea BS's submitted the exact same stuffs to? If not, all right, considering that both CEIBS and other oversea BS's had the same committee, what the hell made you guys think that the committee showed the preference for CEIBS?

真有可能是不同的评委呕


作者: CKGSB_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-26 08:11
怎么才能象那样引用啊?
作者: CKGSB_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-26 08:12
哦,看到了。
作者: CKGSB_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-26 08:36
以下是引用CEIBS_MBA2005在2005-1-25 13:32:00的发言:


in this case, the ranking should be divided by 4? then equal to No.5


应该乘4才对,=88。
作者: victorcorleone    时间: 2005-1-26 21:42

中欧学生毕业三年后的平均薪水才20万?1美元对2元人民币?这肯定是有问题的。

我承认是用PPP来折算的,但是否用1:2,难说。不合逻辑。个人认为1:4比较合理,即中欧毕业生三年后平均薪水在40-50万。


作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-27 09:25
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-26 2:07:00的发言:

To 山水郎


你说得很对,就是PPP!


希望没有冒犯CEIBS_MBA2005及其Ceibs的拥护者,当然我承认CEIBS是一流的商学院。


Dear friend



You are excessive in your worry. I am not as mean-spirited as you imagined. Quite opposite to that, I have consistently embraced any dissent and criticism in conjunction with good intention. Moreover, I appreciate the approach by which you expressed your points, which were divergent from mine.  I esteem you as a sensible man and a man of principle, the virtues that I am supposed to learn from you. Thank you.



One point that I insist to highlight is that argumentativeness shall not be consider synonym of quarrel. Every CDer has and should have his or her own viewpoint and hence should be endowed the authority to voice whatever he or she wants to say (certainly, subjecting to one condition of not insulting or hurting the others). Please be advised that we all are men on the same road. Putting aside the disparity and endeavoring to achieve the parity is our philosophy. Ironically, some of us who are dreaming to pursue the MBA education abroad, particularly in the USA, a land of hope, a land of freedom, are still doing something to fetter the freedom of speech. As such, one particular individual could make such suggestion of requiring another guy to change his picture or word simply because the picture or the word is regarded as unfit by personal criteria. Or in another scenario, a girl claims she is reluctant to be my classmate as she is sick of my remarks and she is normally considered right. The reason being that is simple. People typically think the girls are more objective than boys. However, they are more feelers than thinkers.



Even though I am quarrelling, I do not think that is something to blame. In the jianghu world, we all know “you will never make an acquaintance without fighting”. Through quarrelling, I can figure out which group of people shares the similar point with me and I will definitely foster friendship with them.




作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-27 09:26
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-26 2:07:00的发言:

To 山水郎


你说得很对,就是PPP!


希望没有冒犯CEIBS_MBA2005及其Ceibs的拥护者,当然我承认CEIBS是一流的商学院。


Dear friend



You are excessive in your worry. I am not as mean-spirited as you imagined. Quite opposite to that, I have consistently embraced any dissent and criticism in conjunction with good intention. Moreover, I appreciate the approach by which you expressed your points, which were divergent from mine.  I esteem you as a sensible man and a man of principle, the virtues that I am supposed to learn from you. Thank you.



One point that I insist to highlight is that argumentativeness shall not be consider synonym of quarrel. Every CDer has and should have his or her own viewpoint and hence should be endowed the authority to voice whatever he or she wants to say (certainly, subjecting to one condition of not insulting or hurting the others). Please be advised that we all are men on the same road. Putting aside the disparity and endeavoring to achieve the parity is our philosophy. Ironically, some of us who are dreaming to pursue the MBA education abroad, particularly in the USA, a land of hope, a land of freedom, are still doing something to fetter the freedom of speech. As such, one particular individual could make such suggestion of requiring another guy to change his picture or word simply because the picture or the word is regarded as unfit by personal criteria. Or in another scenario, a girl claims she is reluctant to be my classmate as she is sick of my remarks and she is normally considered right. The reason being that is simple. People typically think the girls are more objective than boys. However, they are more feelers than thinkers.



Even though I am quarrelling, I do not think that is something to blame. In the jianghu world, we all know “you will never make an acquaintance without fighting”. Through quarrelling, I can figure out which group of people shares the similar point with me and I will definitely foster friendship with them.



作者: sv2000    时间: 2005-1-27 11:54

CEIBS_2005讲话很有意思啊。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-27 11:55:10编辑过]

作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-27 12:24
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-27 11:54:00的发言:

CEIBS_2005讲话很有意思啊。




thank you.
作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-27 12:25

Another thing I also want to clarify is nobody here can guarantee that what he or she said is absolute truth. Nevertheless, I am also convinced that nobody come here to fabricate absolute untruth. As for some hearsay, let me cite an old Chinese saying to make my point: wave will never occur spontaneously without wind.


作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-1-27 16:29
I will be on the business trip to Thailand and won’t return until next Friday. So you guys keep going and I will rejoin you soon.  
作者: awclare    时间: 2005-1-28 04:27
以下是引用山水郎在2005-1-25 20:47:00的发言:

Based on FT data, annual package is around RMB 447K. It seems reasonable.




有理有剧又客观,是个读MBA的料啊。


作者: 花则不累    时间: 2005-1-28 06:24
我在exchange的学校听见这边的分析了.50% 2001届的学生,25%2000,25% 99届毕业生的薪水涨幅.大家没有必要来计较这些事情,我不是很care的.但这是中欧10多年来踏踏实实抓质量而不是炒作的结果. 另外这个排名综合了很多因素,就算是排名一样,每个学生的背景和情况也不一样.我们要关心的是自身能给中欧带来什么,能从中欧获得什么.这也是中欧前辈们一贯的追求,才让我们这些后来的学生乘凉的.我相信,我们毕业三年之后,中欧会因为我们的performance跻身前十..
作者: brace    时间: 2005-1-28 08:31
以下是引用花则不累在2005-1-28 6:24:00的发言:
我在exchange的学校听见这边的分析了.50% 2001届的学生,25%2000,25% 99届毕业生的薪水涨幅.大家没有必要来计较这些事情,我不是很care的.但这是中欧10多年来踏踏实实抓质量而不是炒作的结果. 另外这个排名综合了很多因素,就算是排名一样,每个学生的背景和情况也不一样.我们要关心的是自身能给中欧带来什么,能从中欧获得什么.这也是中欧前辈们一贯的追求,才让我们这些后来的学生乘凉的.我相信,我们毕业三年之后,中欧会因为我们的performance跻身前十..


这位兄弟说的好。佩服,真是大家风范。
作者: fenix    时间: 2005-1-30 00:09


the ranking link on FT is here:


http://rankings.ft.com/rankings/mba/rankings.html


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-30 0:12:09编辑过]

作者: zdcgy    时间: 2005-1-30 03:51

According to the rankings from Economist Intelligence Unit, ceibs is still ranked 95, and many FT's fast-progressing UK schools do not fare similarly well too.

While each ranking has its own bias, only when recognized by nearly every major ranking body can a school claim top**.  


作者: xiaoxin    时间: 2005-1-30 09:58

Tiger, someone praised you, xixi...

From my feeling in US, if you earn 1 yuan in China, that life quality is equal to 1 dollar in US for those daily things (lunch, dinner, parking, transportation...) except car and clothes : P


作者: CEIBS_MBA2005    时间: 2005-2-5 12:43
以下是引用zdcgy在2005-1-30 3:51:00的发言:

According to the rankings from Economist Intelligence Unit, ceibs is still ranked 95, and many FT's fast-progressing UK schools do not fare similarly well too.


While each ranking has its own bias, only when recognized by nearly every major ranking body can a school claim top**.  



yes, good point. so for CEIBS, the most urgent thing is to win accrediation by such institutes as AACB,
作者: 山峰    时间: 2005-2-13 23:33

CEIBS_MBA2005 bro,

Thanks for your inputs here!






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3