标题: 有题不会求大神帮助，能否详细解答解题思路 [打印本页] 作者: chelsie_guo 时间: 2014-2-27 21:04 标题: 有题不会求大神帮助，能否详细解答解题思路 For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator 作者: wyw1018 时间: 2014-3-3 17:16
去搜搜吧作者: wyw1018 时间: 2014-3-3 21:30
我怎么觉得答案是B作者: wyw1018 时间: 2014-3-4 21:29
虽然以前的答案都是给的C，但是我还是认为B是正确答案。