ChaseDream

标题: prep 2008 190 british colonies问题 [打印本页]

作者: uato 时间: 2014-1-27 18:26
标题: prep 2008 190 british colonies问题
The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
A. some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter
B. some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all of which had written charters
C. some that formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, all had written charters
D. with some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had a written charter
E. with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter

选项是A
其他的我都能明白
但是A的each had a written charter that set forth its form of ...难道set不应该是sets么？

还是有什么高深的语法点被我bypass了。。。google了一圈都没看到有人质疑这个，看样子还是我弱爆了。。。
谢谢解答

作者: uato 时间: 2014-1-27 18:31
又查阅了一下是说each这种形式的同位语后面的谓语也是跟前面主句的主语而不受each影响么？
直接冲上来就排除A的怎么得了。。。

作者: uato 时间: 2014-1-27 18:42
好像把同位语和独立主格搞混了还是求助吧感觉有点confused 谢谢

作者: wyw1018 时间: 2014-1-27 21:28
这个和each没有关系吧，和each有关的是had
set的过去式和现在时相同

作者: uato 时间: 2014-1-27 23:17

wyw1018 发表于 2014-1-27 21:28
这个和each没有关系吧，和each有关的是had
set的过去式和现在时相同

我会认为set forth的主语是charter那么难道不是sets forth么？

作者: wuyile516516 时间: 2014-1-28 05:43

uato 发表于 2014-1-27 23:17
我会认为set forth的主语是charter那么难道不是sets forth么？

楼上的意思是，
set的过去式和过去分词就是set

这个colony 这个set的事件是发生在过去，所以就是set..

我是这么理解的

作者: uato 时间: 2014-1-28 21:26

wuyile516516 发表于 2014-1-28 05:43
楼上的意思是，
set的过去式和过去分词就是set

哦哦是的过去式看得走火入魔了。。。谢谢！

作者: wuyile516516 时间: 2014-1-29 03:56

uato 发表于 2014-1-28 21:26
哦哦是的过去式看得走火入魔了。。。谢谢！

没事。。有时候看多就会这样

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)