标题: OG13-009我的思路好像有点不一样~求小伙伴指点！ [打印本页] 作者: carolinehu1992 时间: 2014-1-8 09:59 标题: OG13-009我的思路好像有点不一样~求小伙伴指点！ In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to about 41 million tons,nearly 25 percent less than those of the 1978 harvest.
A. less than those of the 1978 harvest
B. less than the 1978 harvest
C. less than 1978
D. fewer than 1978
E. fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
我看了很多大家问的这一题，但貌似没有人和我有一样的疑惑= =
我关于这题的疑惑点是OG的解释中开始就说这题的逻辑意思显然是比产量，而不是比吨。
可是我在做题的时候觉得有可是是比产量，也有可能是比吨，所以根据LESS的话那后面应该是比产量的，FEWER的话可数就是比吨的。
A前后不搭配，比的产量THOSE指吨，CD显然和年比了，就剩下了B和E，最后以WORDY的理由排出了E，觉得B显然更优质一些。
请问我这种思路会不会有问题？是不是应该一开始就排除比吨的可能？为什么不能比吨呢？作者: orangebees 时间: 2014-1-10 08:26
It's simple:
If you can count it then use fewer, if you can't count it then use less.
Example: I have less talent than you
Here, you can't count talent so you use less
Example: I have fewer oranges than you
You can count oranges right? 1, 2, 3 or 4.....etc 产量和吨都是可以衡量的，所以不能用less
Since rice production is already shown to be countable (41 million tons), you use fewer.
B maybe shorter and not as wordy but in GMAT Grammar > Style. You pick the BEST answer and not always perfect answer.
E is actually not wordy if you replace "that" with "rice production"
Nearly 25 percent fewer than rice production of India's 1978 harvest.作者: sirlancelot 时间: 2014-8-19 12:09
我和楼主思路一样，求解啊！
而且为什么OG把它划到Logical predication和diction里。我觉得应该是agreement和idiom啊。