ChaseDream

标题: prep 12 3 [打印本页]

作者: rosy_victory 时间: 2013-12-18 23:37
标题: prep 12 3

Traveler: Southern Airways has a far worse safety record than Air Dacentaria over the past few years, in terms of both the frequency of accidents and the severity of accidents. Therefore, although Air Dacentaria is slightly more expensive, I will choose it over Southern Airways for my flight from Pederton to Dacenta, since it is worth paying extra to have a safer flight.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the traveler's argument?

	Air Dacentaria's flight from Pederton to Dacenta is nonstop, whereas Southern Airways' flight touches down in Gorinda on the way.
	Most Southern Airways flights, but not its flight from Pederton to Dacenta, use Sarmouth airport, which because of its mountainous location is one of the world's most dangerous.
	For its flights from Pederton to Dacenta, Southern Airways uses a different model of airplane, with a smaller capacity, than the model Air Dacentaria uses for its flights on the same route.
	Only in the last few years has the cost of flying from Pederton to Dacenta been more expensive on Air Dacentaria than on Southern Airways.
	Although the frequency of accidents is greater on Southern Airways, on both airlines the proportion of flights that have accidents is very small.

这道题我错选了E,因为问的是驳斥，我觉得E说的是虽然事故率S高于AD，但两家事故率其实都是非常低的，往下一步可以说more expensive 是不值得的，是驳斥。
但答案是B，是说出了P to D，S的路线都是世界上最危险的。确实提了flight 和P to D，但驳斥感觉没有E更加强烈。请大家帮忙分析一二，并给与指导，如何排除E。谢谢~~~

作者: soulwangh 时间: 2013-12-19 10:09
Hi

It is not worth buying a higher price ticket for a small proportion of safety.
This is your assumption but not the author's.

According to the original stimulus, the only thing we know is the author is willing to spent more money for a more safer travel, not matter how much is the margin of the safety. And this will is also the arguer's line of reasoning. Thus, E is wrong for it doesn't go against this line of reasoning.

Thinking of the author as a TuHao not caring about money bu his life will help you a lot.

B is the right choice. It tells us more money might cannot buy more safety.

作者: rosy_victory 时间: 2013-12-19 10:17

soulwangh 发表于 2013-12-19 10:09
Hi

It is not worth buying a higher price ticket for a small proportion of safety.

这道题后来我想了想，觉得是这样的，确实E只是说了两者发生概率很小，是比例问题，而不是frequency的问题，与pay for safer 是无关的。但是B确实是正确的，文中说南航更危险，B选项提出机场更危险，指出了导致危险的原因，所以对原文是weaken。

作者: rosy_victory 时间: 2013-12-19 10:22

soulwangh 发表于 2013-12-19 10:09
Hi

It is not worth buying a higher price ticket for a small proportion of safety.

非常感谢你参与讨论，谢谢~~~

作者: soulwangh 时间: 2013-12-19 10:27

rosy_victory 发表于 2013-12-19 10:17
这道题后来我想了想，觉得是这样的，确实E只是说了两者发生概率很小，是比例问题，而不是frequency的问题 ...

Yes,

E can be the right choice if it changed some words. ie, although the frequency is higher, the proportion is lower.

The frequency and proportion conflicts is indeed a Logic err in the original stimulus. However, E does not express this err directly. It leaves it intact.

作者: soulwangh 时间: 2013-12-19 10:33

rosy_victory 发表于 2013-12-19 10:17
这道题后来我想了想，觉得是这样的，确实E只是说了两者发生概率很小，是比例问题，而不是frequency的问题 ...

Yes,

B points out the reason why it is more dangerous.
More importantly, it points out the reason, making SA's flights more dangerous as a whole, will possibly not have the same effect on a specific flights.

作者: rosy_victory 时间: 2013-12-19 10:55

soulwangh 发表于 2013-12-19 10:27
Yes,

E can be the right choice if it changed some words. ie, although the frequency is higher, th ...

非常感谢，而且我发现你之前一个open to questiion 帖子不错，我准备好好学习一下。非常感谢~~~考试加油哦！你肯定没问题的~~~

作者: soulwangh 时间: 2013-12-19 11:03

rosy_victory 发表于 2013-12-19 10:55
非常感谢，而且我发现你之前一个open to questiion 帖子不错，我准备好好学习一下。非常感谢~~~考试加油 ...

Thanks.

Glad to help.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)