ChaseDream

标题: 【Native Speaker每日综合训练—28系列】【28-14】文史哲 [打印本页]

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-1 23:51
标题: 【Native Speaker每日综合训练—28系列】【28-14】文史哲
Hi~ buddies~
Sunday's exercise is coming~

In Speaker Part, I took an intriguing report about "Love Test" from BBC 6 minute english.
And in Speed Part, there are two articles from distinct subjects. First one discusses about some facets of mordern health system in a different but interesting way(FYI, in the Speed Part, there is only the last part of the whole passage. ). The other one, belonging to the business sphere, is about the trillionaires in the world.
Finally, in the Obstacle Part, like the last time, contains two comments of two recent movies: one is "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" and the other one is "The Armstrong Lie”.
And here are links of those two movies.

"The Hunger Games: Catching Fire”: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1951264/
"The Armstrong Lie”: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1638364/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Part 1 Speaker

[Rephrase1]
'Love test' predicts good marriage
http://http-ws.bbc.co.uk.edgesuite.net/mp3/learningenglish/2013/11/bbc_witn_love_test_report_131129_witn_love_test_report_au_bb.mp3
[Reprot： 56'']

Mp3: [attach]134559[/attach]
Transcprit: [attach]134558[/attach]
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/11/131129_witn_love_test.shtml

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-1 23:51

Part 2 Speed

[attach]134560[/attach]

Article 1(Check the title later)
Excerpt of "Would Lincoln Have Survived If He Was Shot Today?"

Philip Mackowiak
Nov 29 2013, 9:00 AM ET

[TIME2]

Sometimes a life is saved only to leave the patient to linger in dying, never again to speak, see, hear, or awaken into a conscious being.

On January 4, 2006, Ariel Sharon, then Prime Minister of Israel, suffered a different though no less devastating brain injury—a massive stroke. The Israeli heath care system, arguably one of the best in the world, reacted quickly and decisively with a series of sophisticated interventions, hoping for the kind of miraculous recovery sometimes seen in such patients. In spite of a host of aggressive measures, including several surgeries related to his comatose state, Sharon never regained his cognitive abilities. He was placed in a long-term care facility on November 6, 2007. Six years later, he is alive but in a persistent vegetative state.

Abraham Lincoln suffered his massive brain injury almost a century and a half earlier. The health care system in which his physicians operated was far less sophisticated than that of modern-day Israel or the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. It had neither the knowledge nor the tools to save Lincoln’s life, much less preserve his cognitive abilities, in the aftermath of Booth’s attack. If Dr. Scalea’s team had had access to Lincoln at the time of the assassination, perhaps he might have survived, albeit with right-sided hemiplegia and homonymous hemianopsia, along with persistent dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dysphasia. If so, he might yet have retained enough cognitive and communicative function to have restrained the forces of prejudice and vindictiveness that marred Johnson’s period of reconstruction. Lincoln’s genius, after all, was that “In the cave of winds in which he saw history in the making, he was more a listener than a talker.”

However, in medicine as in politics, nothing is certain. Although under the care of a trauma team like Dr. Scalea’s Lincoln might have made a recovery as miraculous as that of Giffords, he might also have fared no better, or even worse, than under the care of Doctors Leale and Taft. As in the case of Ariel Sharon, modern technology produces tragic failures along with spectacular successes. Sometimes a life is saved only to leave the patient “to linger in dying … never again [to] speak, see, hear, or awaken into a conscious being.” It is because of such uncertainty that knowing when not to treat can be more difficult and more important than knowing how to treat.
[Words: 400]
Source: The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/would-lincoln-have-survived-if-he-was-shot-today/281680/

[attach]134553[/attach]

Article 2(Check the title later)
Who Wants to Be a Trillionaire?

By Elliot Hannon

[TIME3]
The global pool of wealth is bigger than ever. Credit Suisse’s 2013 Global Wealth Report puts it at $241 trillion, or 68 percent bigger than a decade ago. That’s not to say that it is being spread more evenly—10 percent of the world’s population possesses 86 percent of the money. Wealth is being created and stockpiled so fast, the report projects, that in just two generations’ time, there could be 1 billion millionaires in the world. That means roughly 1 in 5 adults could soon call themselves a millionaire.

Even billionaires aren’t the exotic species they once were. According to Forbes, there are 1,426 of them today, with more than 200 of them having reached 10-figure status in the last year alone. When Forbes started its billionaire list 25 years ago, there were only 140. It’s hard to imagine the likes of Evan Spiegel, 23-year-old co-founder of Snapchat, turning down multibillion-dollar offers from Google and Facebook even a couple of years ago. Hitting the 10-figure mark: not as cool as it used to be.

It wasn’t always so easy. When John D. Rockefeller rose from a clerk earning 50 cents a day at a produce company to become the world’s first billionaire a century ago, the fortune he amassed would have made Bill Gates swoon. In 1918, Rockefeller’s taxable income was a staggering $33 million, or slightly more than $550 million in today’s dollars. That dwarfs Warren Buffett’s 2010 tax bill, where he paid just under $7 million on $40 million in taxable income. At the time, Rockefeller’s fortune alone amounted to 1.53 percent of the U.S. economy, the equivalent of some $350 billion today.
[Words: 286]

[TIME4]
But even then, Rockefeller wasn’t halfway to the next monetary milestone: a trillion dollars. No one since has even come close. Here’s a clue to just how alien a concept of personal wealth this is: So far, neither Merriam-Webster dictionary nor Oxford have acknowledged the word trillionaire. How does one become something that doesn’t exist yet?

Rockefeller’s rise to extreme wealth came from a familiar source: oil. In 1870, he founded the Standard Oil Company; by the end of that decade, Standard Oil was refining 90 percent of the oil in the U.S. The timing of Rockefeller’s ascendency was perfect: The post-war U.S. was expanding westward and petroleum became the global currency of industrialization. Rockefeller’s road to 10 figures wasn’t paved with good business sense alone; he also benefited from monopolistic practices. When the Supreme Court ordered the breakup of Standard Oil in 1911, the company spun off oil predecessors into the titans of the modern industry: Conoco, Amoco, Chevron, Exxon, and Mobil.

Meanwhile, in Europe, the Rothschild family had built the infrastructure of modern banking. The patriarch, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, set the family on a path pioneering modern finance, acting as a central bank to the continent, striking deals that helped finance the infrastructure of European industrialization, and making them the wealthiest family the world had ever seen.

Could the rise of Rockefeller and the Rothschilds be replicated to create a trillionaire? First, you have to actually want to make that much money. Rockefeller was driven by what he thought was a higher calling to make more and more, but also to give it away. "I believe the power to make money is a gift of God," Rockefeller said. "It is my duty to make money and even more money and to use the money I make for the good of my fellow men."

With his unimaginable wealth, Rockefeller pioneered a contradictory pursuit: the art of giving it away. By the end of his life, he had given away more than $500 million of his fortune, giving rise to modern philanthropy. He invested heavily in education; from his wealth, the University of Chicago was born. He poured funds into medical research to cure diseases and medical schools to train doctors.
[Words: 371]

[TIME5]
Rockefeller strove for “efficiency in giving” just as in his business pursuits, in order “to solve the problem of giving money away without making paupers of those who receive it." It’s an instinct that two of today’s wealthiest—Bill Gates and Warren Buffett—share. The pair’s donations to Gates’ foundation made it a $40 billion juggernaut. And they don’t just want to give their own cash away; they want their fellow billionaires to pledge to give the majority of their wealth to philanthropy. That makes Gates, Buffett, and the many who wish to emulate them all longshots for trillionaire status.

Following in Rockefeller’s footsteps in the extraction business isn’t a sure bet, either. There surely are still billions to be had in oil, but trillions? In an already competitive industry, production has gotten more complicated and expensive. Rockefeller built Standard Oil in the early days of the commercial oil business and relentlessly absorbed competitors to create a monopoly. So tight was his grip on the market that it spurred the antitrust movement, which hinders his successors from achieving the same sort of dominance. As Rockefeller’s oil prepotency waned, global production flourished; in a frantically developing industrialized world, oil reserves took on strategic importance. That meant the countries resting atop oil reserves weren’t going to let it go. Governments have become accustomed to demanding a larger share of the profits for themselves.

Could a new wonder mineral arise to anoint a new Rockefeller? It’s certainly possible. With the explosion of mobile technology from cellphones to laptops to hybrid cars, the insatiable need for batteries has made rare Earth metals a hot commodity. But they, too, are found within national boundaries. In fact, 97 percent of the world’s rare Earth metals are found in China, giving the country a virtual Rockefeller-like monopoly that it won’t let slip away.
[Words: 306]

[TIME6]
A century ago, the world’s wealthiest rode a wave of industrialization in the U.S. that ushered in a Gilded Age. The explosion of communication technology and transportation transformed the American economy into a truly national marketplace. It was a period that created the American middle class, as well as setting the stage for American industrialists to accumulate vast fortunes. Today, a similar process is occurring on a global scale. Global communication and transportation lines have now stretched beyond borders and fuelled the growth of a global middle class. Programmers in India are now part of the labor pool for American companies, which in turn makes them new consumers. That’s not to say that the distribution of wealth has gotten more equal, but more wealth than ever in more parts of the world could set the stage for a trillionaire to emerge.

The two industries are best positioned to take a billionaire to the next level are technology and retail, for the same reason: Both use a global labor pool to make affordable products, inexpensive enough that workers can soon become the consumers of the products they are making. Of course, the tech industry is building on Internet infrastructure to create billionaires faster than ever. In October 2010, photo-sharing social network Instagram came into being; less than two years and a mere 13 employees later, Facebook snapped up the company for a cool billion. A look at the Forbes list of the world’s wealthiest shows that the rise of technology and telecommunications has made a big impact: Mexico’s Carlos Slim, who vies with Gates for the top spot on global-richest lists, made the bulk of his fortune in telecom.

Lurking just below these technology magnates are Amancio Ortega, the founder of Zara; the Walton family and their ubiquitous Walmart chain; the Mars family of candy fame; Stefan Persson, chairman of H&M; and Jeff Bezos of Amazon. The rise of these individuals and families is perhaps more surprising than that of Gates, Slim, and their peers—and may be revealing about the clearest sustainable path to 10 figures. These magnates are best positioned, in different ways, to find and use available labor no matter where it is. That will help them sell their products at prices that a wealthier world will be able to afford most quickly. For that to happen, they’ll need emerging markets to continue emerging, creating not only employees but customers, too. If that happens, in two generations—about 60 years—Credit Suisse predicts there could be as many as 11 trillionaires walking among us.
[Words: 426]
Source: Slate
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/billion_to_one/2013/11/the_world_s_first_trillionaire_is_it_possible.html

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-1 23:51

Part 3 Obstacle

[attach]134552[/attach]

Article3 (Check the title later)
WINNERS AND LOSERS

BY DAVID DENBY
DECEMBER 2, 2013

[Paraphase7]
The basic premise of “The Hunger Games,” the first volume in Suzanne Collins’s trilogy of young-adult novels, never made much sense to me. How could a totalitarian government keep its people down while forcing some of their children to fight to the death in a yearly competition? What could be a greater goad to revolution than the anguish of seeing children die? There were other mysteries and not a few hypocrisies: the filmmakers who adapted the book shrugged off the gladiatorial issues implicit in the spectacle. They wanted to create indignation over the horror—children forced to hunt one another with arrows, swords, lances—while staging the violence in the most anodyne manner possible to achieve a PG-13 rating. The teens I know accepted the combat as a given, while their elders, bewildered, and looking for a little meaning, interpreted the story as a representation of how kids felt about the competitive traumas of high school; or as a metaphor for capitalism, with its terrifying job market and winner-take-all ethos; or, more simply, as a satiric exaggeration of talent-show ruthlessness. The premise of “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire,” an adaptation of Collins’s second volume, doesn’t make a lot of sense, either. Having survived the competition through daring and ingenuity, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and her admirer, Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), receive riches and acclaim from the vicious overlords in the Capitol. Yet rebellion is breaking out in the twelve districts of the country, called Panem, and President Snow (Donald Sutherland) and his new head gamemaker, Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman), cook up a fresh scheme: they will choose among the survivors of all the competitions, some of them now middle-aged or elderly, and throw them into a new struggle, which will somehow quell the rebellion. Distraction is supposed to work miracles. Along with this gang of heavies, Katniss and Peeta are pushed back into the woods to fight again.

Gary Ross’s direction of the first movie, with its wandering, jiggling camera and its fragmented, messy staging, was pretty much an embarrassment. Francis Lawrence (“I Am Legend”), working with a screenplay by Simon Beaufoy and Michael deBruyn, has taken over, and parts of “Catching Fire”—at least the first forty-five minutes or so—are impressive. The scenes in Katniss’s home turf, District 12, have the feel of life under totalitarian control. The mood is Eastern-bloc depression, a gray world drained of vitality. The images are large-scale and weighted: menacing military vehicles charge through the demoralized cities; faceless storm troopers in white plastic helmets clobber people with truncheons. For Katniss, the pleasure of victory never arrives. At the very beginning of the movie, we see her in silhouette, crouching at the edge of a pond, a huntress poised to uncoil. She hates being a celebrity, and she certainly has no desire to lead a revolution. Jennifer Lawrence’s gray-green eyes and her formidable concentration dominate the camera. She resembles a story-book Indian princess, and she projects the kind of strength that Katharine Hepburn had when she was young. Two guys vie for Katniss’s love—not just the doleful, fair-haired Peeta but the faithful, darkly handsome Gale (Liam Hemsworth). But happiness is not her fate. She’s tormented, and wary.

The film moves back to the Capitol for more of the extravagant decadence and purple-pink luxury that was so puzzling in the first movie. Why is everyone dressed in wigs, glitter, and eye shadow, as if outfitted for a drag ball that never ends? The crowds are nothing more than seething, bright-colored décor. Stanley Tucci returns as Caesar Flickerman, and again brilliantly parodies beauty-pageant and talent-show hosts. Unctuous and hostile at the same time, Tucci flashes enormous choppers that glisten in the light. Donald Sutherland, with his satanic eyebrows and rounded, insinuating voice, is an entertainingly threatening presence. And Woody Harrelson, as the hard-drinking realist Haymitch, who guides Katniss through every terror, is the core of intelligence in the movie; he is used more centrally here than in the first film, and his glare and his acid voice cut through the meaningless fashion show. Yet, despite the good acting, the middle section of the film, set at the Capitol, is attenuated and rhythmless—the filmmakers seem to be touching all the bases so that the trilogy’s readers won’t miss anything. In the woods, Francis Lawrence recovers his skills, at least for a while: some of the starts and frights—a bunch of snarling devil baboons, some enveloping poisonous smoke—work in a B-movie-ish way. But there are complications in the plot that the filmmakers can’t sort out. Characters we barely know go chasing through the brush, brandishing weapons. Who are Katniss and Peeta’s friends? Who are their enemies? Some of the confusion is intentional, some of it the result of ineptitude, and the grand climax, whose elements include a long piece of wire, a lightning bolt, and an electronic force field, is an incoherent, rapid blur that will send the audience scurrying back to the book to find out what’s supposed to be going on. Cinema can provide explosions of light and terrors bursting through the foliage, but when it comes to basic exposition of complicated physical events, literature—even a calculating young-adult novel—may have the movies beat.

In some ways, Lance Armstrong is a familiar American type. A handsome man, he has strong, regular features, a ready smile, a finely honed, slender body; he also has an unblinking military gaze that would melt a steel girder. As he admits, in Alex Gibney’s documentary “The Armstrong Lie,” his life has been damaged by the need to win every encounter, be it personal or professional. Armstrong lied until it was impossible for him to lie anymore, and Gibney’s movie unexpectedly hinges on that moment. Seven-time winner of the Tour de France, world-famous exemplar of physical courage (he survived testicular cancer in his twenties), Armstrong, having beaten back countless accusations that he was doping, retired in 2005. But in 2009 he attempted a comeback. The point was to prove that he was “clean,” and to validate his earlier titles by winning another. Gibney, usually a skeptical liberal filmmaker (“Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” and “Taxi to the Dark Side”), was determined to make a positive movie about an American hero. During the 2009 Tour de France, he joined Armstrong’s entourage with a camera crew. Armstrong, as it turned out, didn’t win; he finished third. And in 2010 fresh accusations were made against him. Cornered, he finally confessed to Oprah Winfrey, last January, that he had been doping since the nineteen-nineties. Gibney then reshuffled his footage and put himself, as a self-confessed patsy, in the movie. “The Armstrong Lie” goes on forever, perhaps because Gibney can’t believe that, like everyone else, he’s been had. Again and again, he looks for elements of moral clarity (never mind remorse) in Armstrong, and the cyclist looks back at Gibney (and at us) as if he were a fool. His attitude is: Don’t you get it?

What we don’t get is how often winners will do whatever it takes to win. Gibney interviews Armstrong’s former teammates, who say that, in the nineties, many cyclists were doping, and that they had no choice but to do the same if they were to maintain a competitive edge. An event like the Tour de France is mostly “suffering”—a three-week slog through the Alps and other difficult terrain. Doping increases the amount of oxygen in the blood, delaying the moment when the muscles become exhausted and quit. Armstrong, like many others, took testosterone and the drug EPO. He also refreshed his own blood now and then, transporting the elixir to various tournaments and transfusing it back into his depleted system. (Gibney speculates that he withdrew blood after cycling in the Rockies.) One of the greatest athletes in the world became a kind of ghoul, feeding on his own body.

For Armstrong, success creates its own benediction, absolution, and redemption; after all, as he reminds Gibney, his victories and his personal story brought extraordinary levels of attention and money to the cycling world—competitors, cycling associations, bike manufacturers, media coverage. Many people benefitted from his victories. From our point of view, however, it’s hard to overstate his cynicism. The bitterest parts of Gibney’s movie are the interviews with the former teammates who were caught doping, and whom Armstrong, when he was still officially clean, viciously turned on. These men took the fall. In competition, they literally covered for him—providing protection from wind resistance by riding around him until he could burst from the pack at the last minute to win. For most of his professional life, Armstrong lived in a safety zone created by others. Gibney doesn’t get much out of him; his admissions are as brief, bald, and dismissive as his lies. What’s most alive in him is his contempt for “dickheads”—anyone who has ever held him responsible for anything. The most determined person in the movie, apart from Armstrong, is Betsy Andreu, whose husband, the cyclist Frankie Andreu, was an Armstrong teammate and a victim. She told the truth about Armstrong under subpoena, and refused to be rattled when she was attacked by him and his supporters. In front of Gibney’s camera, she’s both defiant and regretful. Armstrong’s fierce desire to predominate created fear and loyalty. In Betsy Andreu, he seems to have met his match.
[Words: 1560]
Source: New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2013/12/02/131202crci_cinema_denby

作者: 疏离无罪 时间: 2013-12-1 23:58
占~~久违的沙发，感谢JAY

Speaker:A test that can find out whether a couple have unconscious negative feeling to each other,a feeling may affect their marriage.

02:33
Sometimes the life is saved only to leave the patient to linger in dying.Then the article raised two cases:Ariel Sharon and Abraham Lincoln to show its idea.Knowing when not to treat may be more difficult and important than knowing how to treat.

01:42
The global wealth is growing rapidly in the past decades.More people become millionaires and it seem that it is easier to reach that level today.But this is not alway easy.Rockefeller gain much more money in the past.But todday rich people must pay more tax.

02:02
But no one had gain a trillion dollars.Then introduce Rockefeller and Rothschild family who may be the most wealthy family in USA and Europe.They also can not get to that goal.Rockefeller gave out most of his money in his later life.

01:50
The policy of giving out makes two wealthiest share in the world.It is impossible to become a trillionares in oil industry for several reasons.But in mobile technology in china there is a chance.

02:15
The communist technology and transporation line creat fortune fot the American,and now they are creating fortune for the world.More and more people benefit form them.Technology and retail may be the next two industries that can creat billionares.They both have inexpensive costs and can sell goods to people who creat them.Several example companies are raised in these two industry.

08:52
Main idea:We should not do whaever it takes to win
The preimise of hunger game is odds.But the game is just like many competitions in our life such as competitions in high school,in job market and so on.Introduce the movie,the performace of the actors and the characters.
Then the article grow into the armstrong lie.He used drugs in the race to win.What we don’t get is how often winners will do whatever it takes to win. Many winner want to win more games so they choose drugs,even they cost a lot for this action.And at the same time many people benefits from their success.

两电影都没看过，后一个好歹还看过新闻，这越障好艰难。。

作者: thenewme 时间: 2013-12-2 00:07
竟然第二个诶~
晚安~
----------

SPEED

2 2'38

3+4 3'54

5+6 4'53

magnate 巨头

OBSTACLE

8'41

introduction of "the hunger games"(3 volume, characters)

MI : meaningless

作者: 吐吐yeah 时间: 2013-12-2 00:29
好久不见的首页啊啊啊~占个位~谢谢JAY~

掌管 6 00:08:47.56 00:17:27.98
掌管 5 00:01:52.15 00:08:40.41
掌管 4 00:01:36.27 00:06:48.26
掌管 3 00:01:33.06 00:05:11.99
掌管 2 00:01:31.52 00:03:38.92
掌管 1 00:02:07.39 00:02:07.39

obstacle
main idea:comments on two recent movies:"The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" and "The Armstrong Lie”
structure:
1.The Hunger Games 2
attitude:negative(the basic premise does not make sense)
introduces the movie
2.The Armstrong Lie
introduces the story of Lance Armstrong about winning,who is a familiar American type.

作者: 小鱼上树 时间: 2013-12-2 00:58
首页你还在么，哦，你还在哦

28-14

Speaker

Newly-weds sometimes refuse to admit that they have negativefeelings about the other half. They can lie to themselves but they can’t foolthe unconscious feelings deep inside.

2 400 2min14

3 286 1min12

4 371 1min51

5 306 1min34

6 426 1min51

10 percent of the world’s population possesses 86 percent ofthe money. Rockefeller’s rise to extreme wealth came from a familiar source

il. First, you have to actually want to make that much money. the art ofgiving it away. The two industries are best positioned to take a billionaire tothe next level are technology and retail.

作者: sherlock1992 时间: 2013-12-2 05:40
末班车〜，谢谢jay~

28-14
Speaker: Unconcious feelings of new-weddings can indicate future emotional conditions of couples.

Speed:
T2-2'37''
T3-1'46''
T4-2'12''
T5-2'02''
T6-2'27''

Obstacle-9'48''

作者: kimwang53 时间: 2013-12-2 07:09
早起的虫子有鸟吃~~谢谢JAY

speaker
a test that can find people's unconscious negetive feeling about their partner.

speed
2.13
1.25
1.54
1.42
2.02

作者: 叶晴豆 时间: 2013-12-2 07:12
2:57
1:58
2:14
2:16
2:44
Obstacle
Lance Armstrong---winning another earlier but lost in 2009 Tour de France---teammates doping---victim
victories and personal story brought extraordinary levels of attention and money to the cycling world---created fear and loyalty
阅读水平严重受限，实在是写不粗来逻辑链

作者: cherry6891 时间: 2013-12-2 07:32
早安~~~~

Speaker : a research to newly-weds find that who have unconsciously negative feelings can tell the negative words quickly ,and 3~4 years later their negative feelings gradually surface

2 2:42 if life is saved only to leave the patient to linger in dying,then knowing when not to treat can be more difficult than knowing how to treat

3 1:44 the global wealth is bigger and 10%of the world population possesses 86%of the money

4 2:23 how R make his forturn and his art to give the money away

5 1:40 the early footsteps in the extraction business make R his money but now it is an competitive industry. The rare Earth metals found in china give the country a monopoly

6 1:55 the technology and retail make a lot of rich guys

7 11:51 totalitarian,hypocrisies,competitive traumas, attenuated and rhythmless,

Firstly author introduces the book the hunger game and then GR’s first movie which shows basic exposition of complicated physical events ,literature that make it beat

--Armstrong get countless accusations that he was doping

--interview of A’s former teammates ,they have no choice but maintain a competitive edge

作者: 啦啦噜啦啦 时间: 2013-12-2 07:40
谢谢jay！！！！！
[2:42] R was saved by modern advanced technology and stayed in the vegetable station.
Lincoln was killed by the assassination because medicine at his time was not good enough to save his lives.
Modern technology brings tragedy as much as success.Even Lincoln was treated by the team. The situation may become even worse. Therefore, it becomes more important to decide when to treat than how to treat.
[7:57]
The world became wealthier.
First billionaire owned money that once took 1.3% of the U.S's economy. But he didn't become the trillionaire, a word that even oxford doesn't have.
=>Background conditions helped him become wealth.
-> post-war period the whole country needed oil
-> his company took the 90% market of the country and by using monopolistic, it earns a lot of money
-> his family builded bank that functioned like a central bank in the euro, making the family become the wealthest one ever.
=>He was good at not only making money but also giving money away.
It is possible that a family rich as R rise. Since the highly development of the world needs more metal.
Norways the most propective industries are retail and technology. These two industires will bring us trillions one day.

作者: 苏错 时间: 2013-12-2 08:31
二环~~~55555
谢谢jay~~~

12.2

Speaker:

Happy with partner

Research showed negativeemotions between them

Speed:

Time2:2’48

explanations for the sentence mentioned ad first –Sometimes a life is savedonly to leave the patient to…

Time3:1’31

increasingnumber of millionaires and billionaires

Time4:1’41

Rockefeller’s experience about making money and the use of his wealth

Time5:1’49

thefuture of Rockefeller’s oil company

Time6:2’13

technology and retail make trillionaires possible

Obstacle:9’22

The Hunger Games! 看的好开心~~虽然被剧透了…..第二部还没看 T T

作者: miyini 时间: 2013-12-2 08:31
谢谢 JAY

2013-12-03 28-14

Speaker through love test which contains instant reaction and attitude towards their partners, it helps us to predict the duration and success of the marriage at early stage.

2 400 2’19 discuss two cases that both are suffered with disability of cognitive feeling, one is prime minister who lives a vegetable life since 2006 and the other is lincolen one and half century ago having got better since the attack. We draw a conclusion that sometimes it is better to save someone’s life by letting him in the lingering condition. Because you do not know what to do with him and all you have to do is waiting.

3 286 1’41 today, 10% of the population possess 86% wealth in the world, which is more concentrated than a decade ago. One of five adults will be billionaire, and the number they made is growing too. However, the process is not that easy.

4 371 2’02 the process of being wealth of R, he owned his wealth by oil productions, nearly 90 % of all us. He is the person who has a destination of making more and more money. Although he possess such a pool of money, he give it away, almost 500 million after his death. He invested in the educational field, medical field and so on

5 306 1’55 the efficiency of giving money away is just like that of making money. Nowadays , trillinaires are also getting together to donate their money and call on for others wealth people to do donating things to the whole world. Will there is another man like R ? The answer is yes though with lots of constrictions. Rare earth in china is almost dominant in the world.

6 426 2’20 the most likely field of being billionaires are technology and retail, both of which are of low labor cost and big consume power. The prediction of the billionaires in the following years. The number is about 11.

7 1506 9’18

作者: zhouyangweiwei 时间: 2013-12-2 09:50
Time 2--4''22
Main idea:
Knowing not to treat is more important than knowing to treat.

A life is saved to linger in dying, but the patient doesn't have cognition.

AS<< got serious brian attack, the doctors worked hard to save his life, but he never regains his cognitive conscious. After 6 years, he is still alive but persist vegetative status.

Abreham Lincoln, the American president lived 150 years ago, had the same stituation, but the surgeons weren't able to save his life. Lincoln's genuis :"In the cave of the winds, which he in the making, he is a listener rather than a walker. "

Morden technology produces tragic fail along with success.
And knowing not to treat is more difficult and more important than knowing to treat.

Article 2--2''20

The global pool of wealth indicates the figures of billionaires are bigger. And each 1 of 5 adults is a millionaire.

Flobes reveals that ....people gets ...money last year alone. And its not as cool as it used to be.

But getting rich is not easy. Then talks about the J>D, Rockefeller and Warren Buffertt's taxable income.

Time 4--3''17/

The story about Rockefeller, he inherited from his wealthy family in oil industry---Standard Oil...And because of the monopoly, Standard oil company broke into ...Exxcoon, Mobil...etc.

The same way as Rothschild family from Europe.

Rockefeller thinks that the ability of making money is a gift of god. And he donates lots of money back to the society. Including, University of Chicago(((((MY DREAM SCHOOL))))) and programs whose purpose is training doctors.

Time 5--2''39

The art of giving away money is indistinct of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. They followed the steps of Rockefeller.

Time 6--3''52

American became rich a century ago because of the wave of industrization. And in modern society, the communication Technology and Transportation have a similar path.

And the way to make a billionaire to next level can attribute to two industries---Technology and Retail..
Then exemplieries of Mexico's Carlos Slim--The telecom of GATES.

Zara, Walton family with walmart chain, H&M< .

In 60 years, we will see as many as 11 trilionaires .

Obstacle ----10''26....

The articles seems very difficult to understand. Because the author kinda used lots of metaphor to criticize the new film"Hunger Game -2", and somehow, I feel like the topic of "Armstrong" is irrelevant to the first movie......So confused..

Main idea...Criticize the "Hunger Game II" and " Armstrong Lie"

"HG"--the first one doesn't make sense to the author despite its very popular among young generation. The author thinks it creates indignation over the horror. And some young kids liked it because it resembles the competitive traumas of high school..
And the"HG 2" doesn't make sense either. And the producer...GR, should be embarrassed. Despite the good acting of these famous actors, only the first 45 minutes are impressive.

Then Lancer Armstrong....to be known as American hero, but he lied until he couldn't/////

Then criticize the "Armstrong lies"

作者: ranran603 时间: 2013-12-2 10:45

作者: 捉妖 时间: 2013-12-2 11:47
谢谢Jay, 占个座听love test
speaker: an experiment that tests the first intuitional feelings to one's lover can foretells one's emotion that may emergy in 3 or 4 years later.

作者: lylyyu 时间: 2013-12-2 17:55

jay871750293 发表于 2013-12-1 23:51
Part 3 Obstacle

刚开始，感觉也就看个似懂非懂，最后的越障更是眼睛在动，脑子不动。很多单词不认识的感觉，tofel词汇已经过了2遍了呀
追求速度，但是文章就不太明白，下面的都是我比较快的速度了

我是不是有阅读障碍啊

想完全看懂有感觉有不少词汇不认识，怎么破啊
part 1 speaker:
newly-weds
as one might imagine
couple a photograph of their partner for a third of a second：是指partner照片的三分之一吗？
vice versa:反之亦然

part 2:
400  4:05
life is saved linging to die
Irac's prime is saved as vegetation
Lincon might be saved if he is in the condition like Irac Prime
it is hard to know when to save than how to save

Part 3:
286  2:54
Billionires are increasing nowerdays.The fortune is not even.10% people process 85% fortune
It is  hard to image some one would turn off google&facebook offer a few years before

part 4:
371  3:23
how Rockefeller and Rothschild became rich and the fire thillionare
Rocke give the money to edu & medicine

part 5:
306  3:28
97% metals in china

part 6 ;
426  3:32
rich people r mainly from Tech & retail

obstacle
1560  12:44
article introduce 2 movies
first movie is chanlenged by editor

作者: TaoRs92 时间: 2013-12-2 18:03
感谢~速度第二篇非常喜欢~！越障两个电影都没有看过，第二个电影几乎没看懂。然后看完之后觉得还是不去看饥饿游戏2了哈哈哈~

time:2:35.17
The treatment to Lincoln.
He might survive and keep cognitive abilities if he had sophisticated medication at his time.The history may change.
But he might linger to dying,just in vegetative state.
To know when not to treat sometimes is more important than to know how to treat.
____________
time:1:33.87
The wealth of the world is rising fast.And far faster than the increase of population.
Millionaires may be 1 in 5 in the future and billionaires will be normal.
The one--R.
___________
time:2:11.15
At R's time,there was no trillionaires becuase no one could reach that high.
But R was the richest person in the world at that time.His achievements in oil,monopoly.Then his company broke into 5 parts.
The reason R could become such a successful person:the willing to make money--he thinks the ability to make money is the gift from God.
R also gave his money way--invest in education,in medication...
____________
time:1:59.06
R's action encouraged his fellow man to give money away also--Gates and Buffett.
Will another R appear in oil market?Probably no.Because oil become a critical resource and goverment needs to get part of the profits.
Will another R appear in another market?Probably yes.Mobile,hibrid cars...The example of China in its metal markets.The monopoly.
_____________
time:2:29.36
The prediction of the appearance of trillionaire in the future:
Now,the global market provides the possibility(analogy with the national market before)
Now,the two industries provide the possibility:make the employees the consumers/telecommunication and high-tech
Now,other types of industries also provide the possibliliy:zara,amazon..
____________
time:9:30.66
The opinions towards two movies:
Hunger Game:negtive(1&2),bad premise,mislead kids
the beginning:good,impressive,good actress
the middle:confusing,good acting,complicated phsical events
Armstrong:familiar American type
the conflicts in the charaters and their own minds

作者: 单单一定能过IG 时间: 2013-12-2 20:38
2 2'14
3+4+5 3'40
6 1'55

作者: crystal-yao 时间: 2013-12-2 21:04

jay871750293 发表于 2013-12-1 23:51
Part 3 Obstacle

time2 [400] 04:07
AS is alive after the massive brain injury. Lincoln was died after the strok. It is medical progress. However medical is uncertain, sometimes a patient was saved but was to linger in dying.

time3 [286] 02:37
Fortune is largely accumulated and more millionaires exits.

time4 [371] 02:48
Rockefeller's wealth came from oil. Meanwhile in Europe, the Rothschild family stated the modern banking and therefore madethe wealthiest family.
Rochefeller has the want to make that much money and has the spirit to give money back.

time5 [306] 02:45
The antitrust and the aware of oil importance hinder the successors of Rockefeller. A new mineral may arise to anoint new Rockefeller.

time6 [426] 03:45
There are more chances for the emergence of billionaires.
To have afordable products and continue customers is the key factor to success.

obstacle [1560] 1340

作者: 宋可嘉2009 时间: 2013-12-2 21:22
02.40.11
01.53.42
02.14.51
02.21.06
02.57.89
11.32.75

作者: mikewang688 时间: 2013-12-2 21:48
T2-3'15''
T3-2'21''
T4-2'24''
T5-2'31''
T6-2'51''

作者: ldssg 时间: 2013-12-2 22:11
3.24 Shalon suffered from a massive stroke and has lived a vegetative state since then. Doctors could not help him retain cognitive ability.
2.21 there are more millionaires today than in the past, so are billionaires.
The world’s first billionaire Rockefeller.
2.57 No trillionaire in the world now.
How to? Rockefeller in American: oil. Standard Oil Company. Rothschild in Europe: modern bank. You should have strong drive to make more money.
2.29 billionaires today like bill gates and warren buffett are intrinsically giving their money. Oil is not the extraction business to create trillions. Rare metals might do so.
4.10 communication and transportation lines are stretching out all over the world, which fuel the growth of middle class. Retail and technology industrial that use global labor pool and sell affordable products are possible to nourish trillionaires in the future.

作者: olivia瓜瓜 时间: 2013-12-2 22:38
Speaker:

The new weds often tell taht they are happy,but in an uncontrolable feeling test show the true felling of one of the cpuple to partner.
Given one of the couple the photo of the wife/ husband and then showed quickly some extremely negative or positive words, the subject will soon indentify the negative words, if he/she have nagative felling about his/her partner.

Time2: 2m41s
The president of Israel suddenly got a massive brain stroke, after medicine care, he recover from unconsciousness.
The same situation on lincoln, however,in medecine as in politic we cant control the tragic failures or spectacular success.

Time3: 2m09s
The pool of wealth become larger and larger, but not meaning a evenly income, 86% wealth obtained by 10% person of the world.

Time4: 2m26s
How could Rockefeller become richer and richer? Because he want to make money? And he think money power is gift of god.
Eventually he give off his money to many infrastructures.

Time5: 1m52s
The global competition and government hinder the successor of Rockefeller.
Could a mineral will rebuild a new Rockefeller? Yes,the monopoly metal mineral.

Time6: 2m21s
100 years ago, the industryilization enable the people become the billionare, in today, the technology and retail also are the two leading industry to lead more wealthiest.

Obstacle: 11m11s
“The Hunger Games” The first volume of the trilogy of adult novel.
It stated a story about a totalist to control the children and throw any kind of  hardness for them to revolution.
“The Hunger Games: Catching Fire,”The second volume, the daring and genuous remain from the competitive.
In the beginning, the sense is great ,the large scale screen and gray phonomenon to create a visible enjoy.
But in the middle, the filmmaker want to describe all the things in the fiction,actually it’s impossible.
“The Armstrong Lie” The armstrong is the famous type in american, but he have to confess that he use the drug like may sportsman . In front of Gibney’s camera, the teammates wife tell  the truth.
And armstrong ‘s strong desire replace his fear and loyalty.

作者: Dora7 时间: 2013-12-2 23:36
TIME2：2'50''12
modern health care system save AS'life but in vegetative state
maybe lincoln can survive with modern health care system.however maybe worse

TIME3：2'03''93
more and more people become rich.
but for them more tax needed to pay

TIME4：2'32''45
no one come close to a trillion dollars even rockefeller:invovle oil industury and bank
and in his later life do give away most of his money to many aspects

TIME5：1'53''21
oil business make R billioner
next R? maybe new mineral

TIME6:3'o1''21

OBSATCLE:

作者: olivia瓜瓜 时间: 2013-12-3 08:58
Speaker:
The new weds often tell taht they are happy,but in an uncontrolable feeling test show the true felling of one of the cpuple to partner.
Given one of the couple the photo of the wife/ husband and then showed quickly some extremely negative or positive words, the subject will soon indentify the negative words, if he/she have nagative felling about his/her partner.

作者: 395589266xudan 时间: 2013-12-3 10:32
T2 3:59
T3 2:30
T4 3:30
T5 2:38
T6 4:01
obstacle 13:26
Some comments of 2 movies named "The hunger game"and "the Armstrong lie"
Some comments on 2 movies of "

作者: GillSun 时间: 2013-12-3 20:30
还有饥饿游戏的链接小Jay太好呢！！
=========================
Time 2 2'12'' Knowing when not to treat can be more difficult and more important than knowing how to treat.
Time 3 1'22''
Time 4 2'01'' Becoming super rich and the art of giving money away.
Time 5 1'43''
Time 6 2'28''
Obstacle 8'43''

作者: elleyj 时间: 2013-12-3 21:18
Time 2: 2’10
Life is saved for more suffer.—example: Ariel Sharon—vegetative state
If Abraham Lincoln was shot today, still uncertain whether he would be better than Ariel Sharon.
Important—when not to save
补作业补作业，一点点来。。。

作者: lilacrabbit 时间: 2013-12-3 21:31
掌管 5 00:08:35.75 00:18:41.64
掌管 4 00:04:31.82 00:10:05.89 （5+6）
掌管 3 00:02:01.06 00:05:34.06
掌管 2 00:01:24.43 00:03:32.99
掌管 1 00:02:08.56 00:02:08.56

作者: roxlv 时间: 2013-12-3 21:40
补交作业``。。
speaker:
unconscious feeling--negative emotion
test:show photograph of one of their partner--negative words.

speed:
time2 3'15
Sharon got a brain injury,even though receiving treatment did not prevent him from being a persistent vegetative man.So did Lincoln who got a brain injury one hundred year ago.
the most important thing is to know when not to treat.

time3 1'54
nowadays there are a lot of billionaires or millionaires,however fortune that owned by people today is heavily inflated.

time4 3'09
there is no trillionaire existing in the world yet.
whether the rise of Rockefeller and Rothschild could be replicated to create a trillionaire is dertermined by the willing of a person.
Rockefeller started to patronage others by giving away his money.

time5 1'47
the success or the wealth of Rockefeller could be replicated,since mobile technology is prosperous recently.

time6 4'10
much more money is amassed in fewer people's hands.the boom of technology nowadays may trigger 11 trillionaire in future.

obstacle 15'01
the preview of Hunger Games--Catching fire,and the personality of characters in the movie.
and then examplified it in using the story of Lance Armstrong,an American person,to explain the situation of Katniss,who also live in the safety zone that created by others.

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 21:44

iamyingjie 发表于 2013-12-2 00:56
谢谢JAY~ 新的一周愉快！

Speaker:

嘻嘻，谢谢yingjie姐帮我把Speaker部分的online listening补上哈~~

btw，同乐同乐~

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 21:47

啦啦噜啦啦发表于 2013-12-2 07:40
谢谢jay！！！！！
[2:42] R was saved by modern advanced technology and stayed in the vegetable stati ...

哈哈，啦啦君，不必客气哈~

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 21:51

叶晴豆发表于 2013-12-2 07:12
2:57
1:58
2:14

叶晴豆君可以去看看其他队员写得逻辑链，老帖也可以，我记得以前yingjie姐写的逻辑链写得非常赞！
印象中还有其他的队员也很不错，只不过我忘记了...

不管怎样，一般篇幅较长且层次清晰的回忆都是不错，在一定程度上可以借鉴与学习的哈~

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 22:22

lylyyu 发表于 2013-12-2 17:55
刚开始，感觉也就看个似懂非懂，最后的越障更是眼睛在动，脑子不动。很多单词不认识的感觉，tofel词汇已 ...

lylyyu是刚开始小分队练习吗？
如果是刚开始练习的话，这种情况是常有的，像我练习的头一个星期几乎就是在扫视单词，根本无法理解...
应该不会是阅读障碍的问题，不要太担心哈~

理解会收到一些其他因素的影响，比如背景知识理解的程度。以越障为例，讲了2个电影，一个是饥饿游戏，一个是阿姆斯特朗。如果没有看过饥饿游戏（或者看过但忘记了主要人物与剧情），如果不是很了解自行车赛，不知道阿姆斯特朗关于违禁药物使用的谎言，那么都会在很大程度上影响到自己的理解（特别是同时需要保证速度时...）

所以，lylyyu，首先需要解决的是心态，不要着急，要循序渐进，适应一个星期左右的小分队练习之后应该会稍微好一些；在摆正心态之后，需要找好一个速度与理解的平衡，如果是刚开始感觉理解不太好的话，建议花更多的精力在理解上，先读懂，然后在一个较好的理解程度上逐步提升速度。

至于背单词，我个人觉得是一个很深奥的学问，个人认为真正掌握一个单词的宗旨在于对这个单词的“听说读写”四个方面的完全掌握，以阅读为例，看到这个单词能不能瞬间反应出它可能的意思？在句子里看到这个单词能否瞬间确定它合理的意思？我认为如果能够回答以上两个问题，这个单词在阅读上就是真正掌握了。所以，背单词并不是以过了多少遍单词书来衡量的，关键是自己在运用时的把握程度。

个人见解，希望能够对lylyyu君有帮助，加油！！！
欢迎讨论、交流、拍砖~

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 22:25

TaoRs92 发表于 2013-12-2 18:03
感谢~速度第二篇非常喜欢~！越障两个电影都没有看过，第二个电影几乎没看懂。然后看完之后觉得还是不去看饥 ...

哈哈，确实不要去看了，两个多小时的电影，各种混乱...

另外，第二个电影是一个纪录片，讲的是美国自行车手阿姆斯特朗的兴奋剂丑闻，可能taors君对自行车不是太了解吧...

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-3 22:27

GillSun 发表于 2013-12-3 20:30
还有饥饿游戏的链接小Jay太好呢！！
=========================

呵呵，希望GillSun还没去看饥饿游戏2，超级无聊...
强烈建议等网上有资源后下载下来看，去电影院真实浪费时间+金钱...

作者: crystal9291 时间: 2013-12-3 23:51
SPEED
T2 3:10
T3 2:16
T4 2:35
T5 2:26
T6 3:01
看到富豪们累感不爱，屌丝好困，明天来补越障~

作者: TaoRs92 时间: 2013-12-4 08:46

jay871750293 发表于 2013-12-3 22:25
哈哈，确实不要去看了，两个多小时的电影，各种混乱...

另外，第二个电影是一个纪录片，讲的是美国自行 ...

好的！我也没看过1。然后跑人人上下载了1拖了几分钟觉得实在没兴趣。看来是真的可以不看了~谢谢jay~~

作者: lylyyu 时间: 2013-12-4 11:21

jay871750293 发表于 2013-12-3 22:22
lylyyu是刚开始小分队练习吗？
如果是刚开始练习的话，这种情况是常有的，像我练习的头一个星期几乎就是 ...

谢谢Jay的耐心回复，很感动，我先跟一段，有问题再麻烦你们

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-4 14:37

lylyyu 发表于 2013-12-4 11:21
谢谢Jay的耐心回复，很感动，我先跟一段，有问题再麻烦你们

呵呵，不客气哈~
加油加油！！！

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-4 14:46

TaoRs92 发表于 2013-12-4 08:46
好的！我也没看过1。然后跑人人上下载了1拖了几分钟觉得实在没兴趣。看来是真的可以不看了~谢谢jay~~ ...

作者: lyrsilvia 时间: 2013-12-4 16:24
Time 2: 2'18
Time 3: 1'35
Time 4: 2'20
Time 5: 1'56
Time 6: 2'36
Obstacle: 11'02 difficult to understand all.

作者: WindyMM 时间: 2013-12-5 00:27
Rephrase1:
The researchers interviewed more than 100 newly-weds who said they were very happy with their partners.
However, an test their unconscious feelings towards to each other shows some of them have negative emotions which they had to admitted to, even to themselves.
The test involving take photograph of their partner for third of a second.
And then, they answer as quick as possible when the third word is Great, awesome, horrible and scare were positive or negative words.
If they have the unconscious negative feelings to their partners, they were quick to identify the negative words, or vice versa.
Those with unconscious negative feeling had them gradually surface and they admitted to a unhappy in follow-up three or four years later.

TIME2: 02:52
Some treatments made patients alive but cannot move, speak, and listen etc. So the more important is when the patients should be treated than how to be treated.

TIME3: 02:07
The pool of global wealthy is 68% bigger than decades ago. Almost 1 of 5 is a millionaire.
Today, ascending to top 10 is not as difficult as before, but the first billionaire Rockefeller gathered more than 1.5 percent of US economy which is far more than Bill Gates and Buffet.

TIME4: 02:40
Rockefeller did not become the trillionaire and no one has been achieved because Rockefeller made money from oil and the post-war made him the monopolist in oil industry and their family began the banking system in Europe.
Rockefeller thought his gift of making money was from nature, and he also given his wealthy to public, such as university, medical research etc.

TIME5: 02:24
Rockefeller set the efficiency in giving of his money which imitated by Bill Gates and Buffet.
Oil industry cannot be monopoly by private and governments have saved the profits for themselves.
But it is possible to have the trillionaire in the future because the rare Earth metals are the hot commodity which only found in China.

TIME6: 02:39
The trillionaires will come from tech and retail industries because the international communication made world share lower labor costs and also change the producers to the customers.

Paraphrase7: 11:07
“The Hungry Games” are set to PG-13 because of the violet competition and ruthlessness. “The Hungry Games: Catching Fire” continues the game with new rule that all winners should come back to the game again. The film made by two filmmakers, so the expressions of the movies are a little bit different in two parts.
“The Armstrong Lie” described that Armstrong was lying until he cannot lie any more because as the five times winner of Tour de France, he need to win every competition for his personal or professional. The director wants to express the America hero again through the film.
饥饿游戏第一遍看的时候真的很精彩，第二部分大家评价不一，看完文章决定本周末就拿下！

BTW,今天的读起来好累。。。是因为太长了么。。。

作者: yagiliang 时间: 2013-12-5 12:00
Time 2 2:00
It talks about advanced technolody could save one's life even when he doesnt have recognition ability.
It is pitty that President Linken couldnt use this technology to reserve his body

Time 3 1:10
There are more and more wealthy ppl in modern society

Time 4 1:56
There is 2 ppl who are "tri". The tri is not existed in dictionary.
The ppl become so wealthy is because the oil and the banking industry.
One of the men gave some part of his fortune to the public.

Time 5 2:00
The donation behavior has encouraged other wealthy ppl to donate their properties.
However, not every one donate theirs. Because the market is more competitive. but the government has been accustomed to the donation behavior.

Time 6 2:10
The technology development is offer opportunity for ppl to become billioniar than ever before
There are 2 section could make billioniar : Retail and technology.
We could use India as the labor market ,but it doesnt mean that the market is becoming more equal

作者: limin501 时间: 2013-12-5 19:17
Time 2
Even the health care system is much sophisticated , sometimes a life is saved only to leave the patient to linger in dying.
Time 3
The global pool of wealth is bigger than ever.
Time 4
How Rockefeller becomes a trillion man
Time 5
It is also possible to make a new Rockefeller, because the batteries is so propose.
Time 6
Two industries are best positioned to take a billionaire to the next level are technology and retail.

作者: 铁板神猴 时间: 2013-12-6 00:21
2'30"
1'50"
2'23"
2'01"
2'16"

8'40"

作者: 铁板吗啡 时间: 2013-12-6 11:20
Speaker
Speaker
Negative words predict the feelings towards their marriage.
Quickly identify negative words

作者: 88140968 时间: 2013-12-7 11:11
time 2:2'34.28
According to the medical treatment to AS,the article discussed the possibilities of Lincoln's assassination with mordern medical treatment.However, in medicine as in politics,nothing is certain.
time 3:1'37.12
time 4 :2'45.47
time 5:2'01.13
time 6:2'54.20
obstacle: 9'52.43
出差的孩子真是伤不起

作者: pennyz 时间: 2013-12-9 20:51
2：43s
the thought about the meaning of modern technology,whether we should save patients if you just save them to linger in dying
1:41s
2:10s
2:00s
2:51s
main idea:the emerge of billioner is much faster than before.
the story of Rockefeller,why he will be so successful and his endeavor in philanthropy.
the new billioner will come from the technology and retailer where the usage of the labor force worldwide is more commonplace
11:04s
the critics of hunger games
the huger games does not make sense to the author
direction is disappointing
the performance of FL are impressive
the image +
it is puzzel to start from the Capitol
WH is more important at the second episode
yet the medial is still complicate when it come to vivid the content of the book

the story of Armstrong
原来越障是两个电影的影评，看得我好纠结

作者: Arielindo 时间: 2013-12-10 01:00
time2  3:02”
-Even the medicine has been improved significantly, there are still many uncertain that not all of the patients can cure. The author gives the example failure case of the prime minster of Israel, then talks about weather President Lincoln can survive, suffering brain disease.

time 3 +4+5+6 8:20
-The gap between wealth and poor becomes bigger and bigger, comparing to nowadays and past. More and more people can called millionaires. Unlike in the past millionaires earned income from natural resources such as mine and oil in these decades  millionaires earn money form technology and retail. The author gives each aforementioned group details.  These millionaires such as Gates and Buffett do many charities to help the poor.

time 74:07
the author talks about the two movies that The hunger game and The armstrong Lie. He describes each part from the story, then the actors and doubts some of the parts.

作者: epcilon 时间: 2013-12-11 08:00

掌管 1 00:04:02.02 00:04:02.02
Lincoln can be healed by the modern medical technology

掌管 2 00:03:34.18 00:07:36.20
There are more money, more billionaires, and more easily to earn money now than decades before.

掌管 3 00:01:12.09 00:08:48.30
How did Rockefeller earn money.

掌管 4 00:01:46.56 00:10:34.87
How did Rockefeller earn money.

掌管 5 00:03:44.07 00:14:18.94

Technology and retail make billionaires easily now.

作者: 云游 时间: 2013-12-11 16:17
Time 1. 2'02'' Some times life can be saved, albeit leaving the patients in palarized conditions. Ariel, the prime minister of Israle where the healthcare system was far advanced than that in Lincoln's epoch, recieved a series of sophiscated treatment and regained his life, though in a persistant vegetative condition, whereas Lincoln, living a hundred year earlier, is not fortunate enough to receive such a treatment after the assassination. However, as uncertainty is in politics, in medicine, it's more important to know when to treat than how to treat.

Time 2: 1'56'' The world wealth's pool is accumulating fast, enlarging the gap between the rich and poor at the same time. The wealth piling speed is more stagering than it used to be, most notebly in Evan, the co-founder of snapshot, who become a multibillionare in years, and Rockeffeler spending a life time building up his business empire.

Time 3: 2'33'' Trillionare does not exist in Rockefeller's time, but it turns out a reality now. While Rockefeller made his great wealth from oil, Rothschild gained their fortune from banking. But one common trait in those two giants, despite their accumen in making money, is their ability to give money away.

Time 4: 2'54'' Gates and Buffler Fundation made them a longshot for trillinare status;their grip on the market also raise an antitrust sense, in which people believe their dominance on the market will cause little room for their successors' entrance. It is possible, however, for the rise of new billionares in other industry, say minerales. But as 97 percent of the resources lie in China, people from other countries might not have an easy access to this fortune.

Time 5. 2'00'' A hundred years ago, the world's wealthiest rode a wave of indsutrialization in the U.S.. Technology and retail are the two best industries that could take billionare to the next level, as long as the emegering market keeps emerging, providing cheap workers to produce and consume the products they have made.

Obstacle: 9'00''

作者: 铁板神猴 时间: 2013-12-12 22:08

jay871750293 发表于 2013-12-3 22:22
lylyyu是刚开始小分队练习吗？
如果是刚开始练习的话，这种情况是常有的，像我练习的头一个星期几乎就是 ...

鼓掌~~

作者: jay871750293 时间: 2013-12-15 18:59

铁板神猴发表于 2013-12-12 22:08
鼓掌~~

嘻嘻，谢谢猴哥呀~

作者: 344531519 时间: 2013-12-16 09:23
3'23 [118WPM] Lincon maybe saved if treated by the Sharon team, but Sharon team failed to save Sharon himself.The result of the modern medicine is unpredictable, some time it just lead the patient to worse status.

2'10 [132WPM] The world is getting richer and richer, but the spread of the fortune is not so evenly. There are more and more billionaires nowadays.

2'36 [143WPM] However the trillionaire never come true. Then demonstrate how Rockfeller and Rothchild earn money. And talks about how Rockfeller give his money out.

2'10 [141WPM] Rockfeller also demand efficiency in donation, that is, make sure every penny donated will go to the people who need help.This instinct was shared by Gates and Buffet. Will there be a new trillionaire? Possible if new mine is found. Eg:The rare mud in China has made a virtual trillionaire.

2'25 [176WPM] Predict that the trillionaire may come from the technology industry and the retail industry. Then named some billionaire emerged in these industry. Argue that the billionaire emerged very fast in these industry.

10'34 [148WPM]

作者: lexiyanou 时间: 2013-12-17 16:15
[T2]2:38
a life is sometimes saved only to leave the patient to linger in dying, never again to speak, see, hear, or awaken into a conscious being.
[T3]1:48
It is easier for people to become the billion millionaires compared with the past
[T4]2:16
Rockefeller earned money from a familiar source

the Standard Oil Company)- and he was driven by what he thought was a higher calling to make more and more, but also to give it away.
[T5]2:10
Rockefeller,Bill Gates and Warren Buffett established funds donations in order to make their fellow billionaires to pledge to give the majority of their wealth to philanthropy;it is hard to expand business in oil field since governments have become accustomed to demanding a larger share of the profits for themselves. it is possible to  anoint a new Rockefeller in IT industry.
[T6]2:35
Global communication and transportation lines have now stretched beyond borders and fuelled the growth of a global middle class. and new  trillionaires  most appear in retail and technlogy fields and some examples are described.
[T7]9:59
Structure:
1)The purpose of the content in the movie why kids fight with each other but their parents do not care is to show  the competitive traumas of high school; or as a metaphor for capitalism
2)The first movie is so puzzling that the extravagant decadence and purple-pink luxury frequently appear.
3)Lance Armstrong is a familiar American type.

作者: neverbluelala 时间: 2013-12-19 11:21

Native Speaker 28-14
Speed:
1.2'53[400]
2.2'31[286]
3.2'38[371]
4.2'46[306]
5.3'12[426]

Obstacle:
13'06[1560]

作者: wensd1111 时间: 2014-7-5 15:59
1 A 02:17
2 A 01:47
3 A 02:02
4 A 02:04
5 A 02:06
6 A 08:40
hungry hunter is a movie, but it is somewhat less casuality. the filmmaker, armstrong, contribute to the cycle,

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)