ChaseDream

标题: GWD-5-30 再来 [打印本页]

作者: billgong 时间: 2005-1-10 13:20
标题: GWD-5-30 再来

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. roponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

我做题时选的是C。但review后，再看了以前的很多帖子，倾向于E。理由就一条：

原文...or else misleading...中那个else。有了这个else,就暗示后文该讨论煮后再吃的问题(either后讨论的是生吃)。否则的话，原文用either...or...就足够了，没必要画蛇添足加个else.

欢迎再讨论。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-14 12:40:01编辑过]

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)