ChaseDream

标题: 关于to be 的用法 [打印本页]

作者: goodbaby102    时间: 2013-11-15 09:59
标题: 关于to be 的用法
下面是关于to be用法的两个题目,为什么一个可以用,一个不可以用啊,有人可以帮忙解释一下吗?

1,The World Wildlife Fund has declared that global warming, a phenomenon most scientists agree to be caused by human beings in burning fossil fuels, will create havoc among migratory birds by altering the environment in ways harmful to their habitats.
2,
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
谁可以分析一下为什么一个可以用thought to be 而一个不可以用agree to be呢? 谢谢

作者: kiwifoodtown    时间: 2013-11-15 14:41
简单的说一下,LZ可能理解错了,1句中LZ 把它看成是agree to be是不对的,首先agree是作为most scientists的谓语,而be caused 是针对a phenomenon,两者不能简单串联为agree to be caused. 这样就会造成句子的行为对象混乱。所以在C选项中,就加以区分,a phenomenon 用that is caused by。。。这个定语加以修饰,而most scientists agree 是作为插入语。这个句子和agree to be没有关系。

而2句,thought to be完全是过去分词作定语来修饰a kind of fat。所以,它是要和句子逻辑意思相符合,它和上一句无可比性。





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3