Several ancient Greek texts provide accounts of people being poisoned by honey that texts suggest was made from the nectar of rhododendron or oleander plants. Honey made from such nectar can cause the effects the texts describe, but only if eaten fresh, since the honey loses its toxicity within a few weeks of being made. In Greece, rhododendrons and oleander bloom only in springtime, when they are the predominant sources of nectar.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly support the accounts of Greek texts?
A. There are no plants that Greece in ancient times that produce more nectarthan rhododendrons or oleanders does.
B. In areas where neither rhododendrons no roleanders grow, honey is never poisonous.
C. A beebive’s honeycomb cannot have some sections that contain toxic honey and other sections that contain nontoxichoney
D. The incidents ofhoney poisoning that are related in the ancient texts occurred in the springtime or in the early summer
E. Whether the honey in a beehive is toxic depends solely on which plants were the source of that was used to make the honey.
我的想法是，它的问题是support the accounts of Greek texts,而不是 support the argument 之类，但是greek text 只是提及people being poisoned by honey that texts suggest was made from the nectar of rhododendron or oleander plants，其他都不是Greek text的内容，都是后人自己推理出来的内容，如果支持greek text的话，我觉得b更好呢，但是如果support the argument ,我肯定不会这么选了，求nn指教呀
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |