ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD-2-14 [打印本页]

作者: sissa    时间: 2005-1-9 12:07
标题: [求助]GWD-2-14

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.



Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?



  • Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.


  • This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.


  • This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.


  • The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.


  • More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

  • =================================================


    請問答案為什麼是A呢~


    A的確切與一是什麼阿..看不太懂說..


    是"因為接洽的頻率相同,所以暗示S大學的募款者沒有特別努力"-->釋這樣解釋嗎?


    謝謝各位高手解答~


    謝謝~!!








    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3