标题: OG13 SC T16 [打印本页] 作者: 阿萨德积极 时间: 2013-10-27 19:51 标题: OG13 SC T16 A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.
C. claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts.
这道题目A是正确的，但是LZ不是很理解OG对C的解释：the sentence offers no plural subject to fit the passive verb have been thought. 但是LZ怎么觉得这里have been thought的主语就是analysts?
请解答！ 作者: wwxavier 时间: 2013-10-28 06:09
愚见
第一种方法：语义分析，A,经济没有分析家想的那么弱；C,经济没有被想到像那么弱通过专家。c读的别扭
第二种方法：主动优于被动作者: kiwifoodtown 时间: 2013-10-28 10:12
OG的解释虽然只是一方面，但却没有错，the economy 确实不能用have been thought这种复数形式表达。作者: 4Hs 时间: 2013-10-28 10:36
你认为have been thought的主语是scientist，那就还原到句中看看对不对，'scientists have been thought by scientists'，从句的主语已经明确列出来是economic，为单数，不能用复数的have。