ChaseDream

标题: prep07 cr2 35 逻辑题求NN!!! [打印本页]

作者: Shapley 时间: 2013-10-26 09:43
标题: prep07 cr2 35 逻辑题求NN!!!
查到的讨论帖不多！实在不明白...便再来问问！！

It is illegal to advertise presceiption medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to presceibe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluste the argument?

B. Whether some people might got to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised.
E. Wheher physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired.
answer: E

手打原谅只写这两个选项上来...我选了B。
我觉得没有B 我确实可能会选E的但毕竟E是当yes 只有在之前医生开的药不起作用的时候，医生会选择开广告药给病人不算否定原文；当no 原文成立。
而B选项当yes 有人直接来找医生开药这就说明原文说的 “医生总有决定权，不适合的要不会开”相悖否定原文; 当no 原文成立。

求指教！>O<

作者: wwxavier 时间: 2013-10-28 05:46
当数学题来做吧。yes之间比较
B选项，yes: 医生可能给开，（10%? 40%? or 90%?)/ no：成立
E选项，yes: 医生一定给开 (100%)/ no:成立
所以E选项更加直接！

作者: Zacks 时间: 2013-10-28 06:22
B选项：只说广告会使病人去找医生开药，但没提到关键问题：医生会不会同意开药，故无关。
E选项：描述在何种情况下医生会同意病人开广告中的药，明确说明广告会影响病人最终得到的药，逻辑清晰。

作者: Shapley 时间: 2013-10-28 21:08

wwxavier 发表于 2013-10-28 05:46
当数学题来做吧。yes之间比较
B选项，yes: 医生可能给开，（10%? 40%? or 90%?)/ no：成立
E选项，yes: 医 ...

懂了懂了关键是医生!! 非常谢谢!!

作者: Shapley 时间: 2013-10-28 21:09

Zacks 发表于 2013-10-28 06:22
B选项：只说广告会使病人去找医生开药，但没提到关键问题：医生会不会同意开药，故无关。
E选项：描述在何 ...

懂了！谢谢！：）

作者: 阿拉梦 时间: 2015-5-10 15:40

Zacks 发表于 2013-10-28 06:22
B选项：只说广告会使病人去找医生开药，但没提到关键问题：医生会不会同意开药，故无关。
E选项：描述在何 ...

赞~~~~~~~~~！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)