ChaseDream

标题: verbal分册 CR#4 [打印本页]

作者: zhudanqing 时间: 2013-10-24 16:02
标题: verbal分册 CR#4
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase , based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.

Which of the following statements , if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

(A) The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.

(B) The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.

(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of material used for the products.

(D) Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.

(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

可能是我的思路有问题，这道题就是整不明白其中的推理链，请NN们帮忙理一下此题思路。谢谢！

令：今天做了verbal分册的CR部分题，发现明显比OG13要简单很多。不知道是本人CR有所提高还是确实题目简单，请过来人指点一下。万分感谢~~

作者: lifeisanart 时间: 2013-10-24 20:49
答案是A吧。
题weaken题： historical costing对于军事合同来讲并不是一个经济有效的定价方法。（当时差点看成对生产商了！）
   题目前提是：政府付给军火商的钱=上一年的合同价格+当前通货膨胀率一定的百分比金额
   A. 政府继续低效利用资金。就是说不管以前是不是花钱花错地方，今年还继续这样。明年又基于今年乱花钱的基础上付钱，显然这个方法不好嘛。
   B.通胀率变化又怎么样，并不能说明这个方法不好
   C.合同价格会极大地被材料成本变化所影响又怎么样，成本变化引起的通胀率的变化早就考虑进去了，也不影响去年的合同价格。跟定价方法好坏没关系。
   D.无关选项
   E.无关选项

作者: zhudanqing 时间: 2013-10-24 21:58

lifeisanart 发表于 2013-10-24 20:49
答案是A吧。
题weaken题： historical costing对于军事合同来讲并不是一个经济有效的定价方法。（当时差点 ...

谢谢~~~后来跟同学讨论了之后也理解的题目的意思了.....开始我也看成是对供货商了，后来才发现是对整个合同！= =囧

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)