标题: 大全中一道 [打印本页] 作者: Spencer125 时间: 2013-10-22 11:45 标题: 大全中一道 268. During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they can no longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could
答案E
E 成分如何分析。 为何要用for D为何不对? 作者: Indigolove 时间: 2013-10-22 12:04
During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they can no longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could
First, this is a very short underline sentence, so it mainly has something to do with one word.
And this sentence is dealing with modifier issue, so what modifier do we need? that? on which? for which? or transition word-because?
H.M.F resulted in...........bla bla( Ver bad, terrible )....we need a word here, ( ......... ) because it modifies the previous stuff, and it should make sense, here we are a little bit stuck, but if we see the sentence behind the underline sentence: no longer afford......, oh, we got it! afford for home mortgage foreclosures, and they in these five choice must mean tens of thousands of Americans, so the meaning should be tens of thousands of Americans can no longr afford for ......., so we have answer, which is E.
According to Wiki: Foreclosure is a specific legal process in which a lender attempts to recover the balance of a loan from a borrower who has stopped making payments to the lender by forcing the sale of the asset used as the collateralfor the loan.
The specific legal process result in.............and I think that make sense
作者: Spencer125 时间: 2013-10-22 13:15
Indigolove 发表于 2013-10-22 12:04
During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans ...
During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes because they can no longer afford monthly payments.
Could is correct as the entire sentence is in the past tense and hence can would not be in sync, so D.....is wrong for " can" should be could
let's make another funny sentence: The trend of the skinny jeans resulted in tens of thousands of girls being as poor as a church mouse because they can on longer afford the expensive payment.
The reason why those girls are as poor as church mouse is not they can on longer afford the expensive payment
The trend of the skinny jeans resulted in tens of thousands of girls being as poor as a church mouse for which they can on longer afford the expensive payment.
I use Stacey Koprince's words:
In the given SC here, we already know they're being evicted. Why they're being evicted is non-essential info - we still understand what's happening. So we need which.
Also - you'd remissing a "for" in here. They can't afford the payments FOR the homes. You'll hear people say something like "that they can no longer afford monthly payments for." Can't say this - both because "that" is incorrect and because we can't end a sentence with a preposition (for). If you pull "for" earlier in the sentence, it becomes apparent that "that" doesn't work: homes for that they can no longer afford monthly payments. Needs which.