ChaseDream

标题: 还是黑脸题 [打印本页]

作者: virgmat 时间: 2013-10-19 15:44
标题: 还是黑脸题

Environmental organizations want topreserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residentialdevelopment. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who ownit. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, theywould sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any otherbidders. On the other hand, thesefarmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming itremains viable. But farming will notremain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lackthe financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would beto assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintainviability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaceproportions play which of the following roles?

The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

答案是4，本人同意，但觉得5好像也对，请大侠帮忙指出5的错误，谢谢！！！

作者: virgmat 时间: 2013-10-20 16:35
自己顶一顶~~

作者: virgmat 时间: 2013-10-22 19:16
期待大侠的出现~~

作者: virgmat 时间: 2013-10-23 12:42
每天一顶

作者: wjtwenzi 时间: 2013-10-24 13:51
楼主可以看看这个帖子，和你的问题一样，有牛牛解答：http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-182993-1-1.html

作者: virgmat 时间: 2013-10-25 20:45

wjtwenzi 发表于 2013-10-24 13:51
楼主可以看看这个帖子，和你的问题一样，有牛牛解答：http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-182993-1-1.html ...

终于明白了，谢谢好心人

作者: kuanli 时间: 2020-8-24 17:00
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
E 選項錯在第二個 BF
E選項的第二句：如果要達到目標（reserve the land ...）則必須改變這個狀況（farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.）
也就是說, 必須改變『給定 farming it remains viable下農民不會賣地』這項事實, 但是題目沒有說必須改變這個條件才能達到目標, 而是 assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability 即可。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)