enkyklios 发表于 2013-10-13 16:48
MANHATTAN上的这个说法靠不住，或者不严谨。要不就是人家还说了别的你断章取义了 ...
| 以OG106题为例........ Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology. (A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission (C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, (E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission, 答案是A，根据解释，which指代a technique. C和D都是错误答案，解释提到which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission. 但是根据MANHATTAN，Use WHICH ONLY to refer to the noun immediately preceding it. 也就是说A项里的which也应该指代emission,个人感觉很矛盾，望大侠指教~ |
enkyklios 发表于 2013-10-13 16:48
MANHATTAN上的这个说法靠不住，或者不严谨。要不就是人家还说了别的你断章取义了 ...
virgmat 发表于 2013-10-13 17:55
MANHATTAN仔细确认了下，没漏看，就是这么说的，而且还打了粗体强调。
求严谨的判断文化现行词的方法。 ...
enkyklios 发表于 2013-10-13 18:05
Use WHICH only to refer to the noun immediately preceding it-never to refer to an entire clause.
...
辛苦了~
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
