天山3-23
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived; if the farmers did sell their land , they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation srategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
D. the first presents a goal, stragegies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
答案是D, 我觉得A 没什么不好啊. 第二句话怎么是judgment 而不是 evidence了? 另外perservation 目的就是maintain viability吗?
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. 环境保护者的目标是土地不被用作住宅开发，而不是保护土地不用来种地。这个目标是作者也支持的。所以
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived;是错的。
。
谢谢greeley, philipzhou, 我才发现ill-conceive指的是plan. 两位真是细心, 一语道破啊! 向你们学习.
另外想说明一下, 这道题前后的stragety 有shift. 前面说的是Environmental organizations preserve the land from residential development.
后面的是preservation srategy
太搞了点.
請問D選項 哪來的strategies??
strategies不是在原文第二句才出現麼?
I think E is better!
先把题目贴全：
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived; if the farmers did sell their land , they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation srategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
答案应该就是D。D非常tricky，须仔细读，strategies for achieving which are being....是修饰goal定语从句，不是presents的宾语。E选项第二句话不对，“如果X那么Y”是a judgement（论断），不是situation。
这在去年新东方发的补充教材上也出现过，费费给的答案是E：E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
不过我还是倾向于D。请继续讨论。
feifei xdf补充教材上确实是e，他上课时也讲到了这道题（去年年底），当时我没什么异议，但复习的时候仔细阅读，发现e虽然看起来说的通，但与d对照一下，还是d好，描述的更确切且没有错误的地方，e我虽然也没跳出太大毛病，但感觉还应该是d
请问B为什么不对？
B is wrong, becs the author argues that the plan is ill-conceived, not the goal.
E感觉不如D好: a situation that the argument contends must be changed指的不像是黑体部分:"farmers will never actually sell....", must be changed更象是在指后面的"if the farms are left unmodernized"
B is wrong, becs the author argues that the plan is ill-conceived, not the goal.
但B说的是presents a goal that the argument concludes can not be attained, 即认为plan是ill-conceived，所以我认为B比D好！
请指教
這題好纏阿..
考試遇到這種題目第一個舉白旗...
簡單解釋題目:
環保機構想要達到保護土地使其不要成為住宅區,所以想要去收購農地
因為農夫不可能全部賣出,所以收購是無用的方法
但是農夫沒有使用現代化機械器具的資金,這些土地就無法耕種(這樣有可能仍會開發成住宅區)
所以 應該提出更好的策略協助農夫現代化耕種 (如此就可以達到環保土地的目標了)
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
the first : 文中沒有下結論說環保的目標一定無法達成, 只是undermine the method and proposes a better solution
我覺得這一段話是評估一個方法 針對GOAL的達成與否 文中持保留的態度
如果使用協助農業現代化的方法 ...目標是有可能達成的
所以A B C 對the first 的說法都有誤
對於E
我覺得the first is correct but the second is error
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
因為 農夫不賣地的現象 是不會改變的 只是要用其他方式協助農夫
所以覺得a situation must be changed 有問題
我暈了~~~
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |