ChaseDream

标题: 平行 OG 13 DT 38th the results of two recent unrelated [打印本页]

作者: caroline莲莲 时间: 2013-9-28 11:55
标题: 平行 OG 13 DT 38th the results of two recent unrelated

The results of two recent unrelated studies support the idea that dolphins may share certain cognitive abilities with humans and great apes; the studies indicate dolphins as capable of recognizing themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered a sign of self-awareness-and to grasp spontaneously the mood or intention of humans.

a. dolphins as capable of recognizing themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered a sign of self-awareness-and to grasp spontaneously

b. dolphins' ability to recognize themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered as a sign of self-awareness-and of spontaneously grasping

c. dolphins to be capable of recognizing themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered a sign of self-awareness-and to grasp spontaneously

d. that dolphins have the ability of recognizing themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered as a sign of self-awareness-and spontaneously grasping
e. that dolphins are capable of recognizing themselves in mirrors-an ability that is often considered a sign of self-awareness-and of spontaneously grasping

问题：
1. 选项c
OG: "to be capable of recognizing" is not parallel to "to grasp spontaneously."
我觉得这个选项应该理解为of recognizing和to grasp不平行，OG的解释是不是有些奇怪？
2. 选项d
OG: “of recognizing” and “spontaneously grasping” are not parallel.
但是...have the ability of recognizing... and grasping并没有歧义啊，
我知道have the ability of这个搭配是错误的，问这个问题主要想搞清楚平行中and后面什么时候可以省略介词什么时候不可以？

open to discuss

作者: ashlyzhu 时间: 2013-9-28 12:55
我觉得这题选E。。。对不对啊。。。这题好运啊

作者: caroline莲莲 时间: 2013-9-28 14:25
忘记写正确答案了，是选择e

作者: ashlyzhu 时间: 2013-9-28 16:10
{“OG: "to be capable of recognizing" is not parallel to "to grasp spontaneously."
我觉得这个选项应该理解为of recognizing和to grasp不平行，}你的意思不是和og 的意思一样吗？
第二问：我觉得og说的不对啊。。。。of加上和不加上差不多吧。。。都可以吧。。。

作者: caroline莲莲 时间: 2013-9-28 16:16
{“OG: "to be capable of recognizing" is not parallel to "to grasp spontaneously."
我觉得这个选项应该理解为of recognizing和to grasp不平行，}你的意思不是和og 的意思一样吗？

-----
不一样吧，感觉OG是说to be和to grasp不平行，逻辑上不平行；我的理解呢是of doing和to do不平行，语法上不平行；

不过你这么一说，我可能有点钻牛角尖了

作者: Stella-Estela 时间: 2013-9-28 16:17
1.同问；
2.Ron貌似有解释：链接：http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=13317&view=next
“no parallelism issues in (d).
the parallel structures in that choice are
recognizing ... AND (spontaneously) grasping
in this case you don't have to pay attention to the word "of" in front of "recognizing".

remember -- when it comes to what should be included in parallel structures, the only words that MUST be included are words that follow signals.
there's no signal in front of the left-hand part here, so you just take whatever is in parallel with the right-hand part.”

作者: caroline莲莲 时间: 2013-9-28 16:20
2.Ron貌似有解释：链接：http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=13317&view=next
----
Ron是说加不加都行吧，OG说得加of

作者: Stella-Estela 时间: 2013-9-28 16:24

caroline莲莲发表于 2013-9-28 16:20
2.Ron貌似有解释：链接：http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=13317&view=next
---- ...

嗯 Ron说加不加都行

作者: caroline莲莲 时间: 2013-9-29 21:52
好沉一个帖子

作者: Hendy 时间: 2014-12-27 21:45

I've lived in Minnesota and Florida. --> correct
I've ilved in Minnesota and in Florida. --> also correct

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)