ChaseDream

标题: 【求助】13OG书,P37,我问题都木有看懂。。。 [打印本页]

作者: godgod777    时间: 2013-9-25 21:12
标题: 【求助】13OG书,P37,我问题都木有看懂。。。

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

  Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?什么意思啊??

  (A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will soon decrease.

  (B) Importing either grain or meat will not result in a significantly higher percentage of Gortlanders' incomes being spent on food than is currently the case.

  (C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is increasing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.

  (D) The per capita income of meat producers in Gortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers.

  (E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.



作者: godgod777    时间: 2013-9-25 21:28
是不是问---以下假设哪条可以削弱文章论据??
作者: godgod777    时间: 2013-9-25 21:31
还是问---以下哪些假设可以推断出文章论证??
作者: IBiturbo    时间: 2013-9-25 21:53
假设题呀!!  我觉得其实有点像加强题,就是在逻辑推理中存在某些漏洞,假设就是要去弥补这些漏洞,从而使结论更加令人信服!
作者: wyx85    时间: 2013-9-26 06:01
这个题目问的是这段话的assumption。Premise有两个,1是说G这个地方长期以来谷物和肉类都是自给自足;2是说生产肉类需要更多的谷物。  Conclusion是Therefore后面那句话,G这个地方的人均消费肉类水平,如要提高,就必须进口谷物或者肉类。
由此可以推测,这个argument提出的assumption是,如果用更多谷物去产肉,那么谷物就不够吃了。言下之意,是说人们还会和原来一样消费同样多的谷物,但是会消费更多的肉(人均消费肉类水平上升)。
不知道说明白了么?
作者: 家人健康平安    时间: 2013-9-26 11:02
楼上解释的很清楚了,在肉类消费提高的基础上,谷物类的消费可能会减少很多,所以可能不需要进口。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3