ChaseDream

标题: 【求助】prep08 逻辑112 [打印本页]

作者: Lilacing 时间: 2013-9-24 19:11
标题: 【求助】prep08 逻辑112
112.

Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival

这题其实只能选E 但是还是不是很明白题目不是说了Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild 那也就是说只要plan成功了（an impediment),老虎就不会灭绝~~~~

求牛人解答~~~~

作者: IBiturbo 时间: 2013-9-24 19:38
尝试解答一下哈~ Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild，就是说，如果捕猎下降，那么老虎就不会很快灭绝。那么只要实施了法规，那么就能保证老虎的存活？楼主仔细考虑一下存活和灭绝的关系。
要survival 需要有多个方面的保证，其中之一是捕猎活动的减少，但不一定说捕猎活动少了就会survival。

第一次回答问题。。请多包涵!

作者: Lilacing 时间: 2013-9-24 19:52

IBiturbo 发表于 2013-9-24 19:38
尝试解答一下哈~ Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild，就是说，如 ...

就是说灭绝和存活其实不能等同于一件事？

作者: IBiturbo 时间: 2013-9-24 20:00

Lilacing 发表于 2013-9-24 19:52
就是说灭绝和存活其实不能等同于一件事？

我觉得是这样的，灭绝的反义词是不灭绝，而不是存活！而且灭绝是针对群体，存活是针对个体吧？你觉得呢？

作者: Lilacing 时间: 2013-9-24 20:08

Lilacing 发表于 2013-9-24 19:52
就是说灭绝和存活其实不能等同于一件事？

恩恩有道理谢谢啦~~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)