标题: 求高人指点!一道关于因果类型逻辑题目的疑问 [打印本页] 作者: ssyy-mail 时间: 2013-9-13 10:54 标题: 求高人指点!一道关于因果类型逻辑题目的疑问 Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
A Company P manufactures products that are more hazardous for workers to produce than does CompanyO.
B Company P holds more safety inspections than does Company O.
C Company P maintains a more modern infirmary than does Company O.
D Company O paid more for new job-related medical claims than did Company P.
E Company P provides more types of health-care benefits than does Company O.
两个公司人啥的都一样
P:事故量:O小于 P
C:因此:O的人更不容易有事故 作者: abc791201064 时间: 2013-9-13 19:30
我没有按照LZ的办法 因为我不知道那是HLER还是哪儿的方法 helr的方法我研究了半个月都咩有研究 就按照你自己的逻辑 B 我感觉不可以support 反而在说反话
A。 说的方向首先是对的 P的产品比较危险 这是一个因素 作者: joyang_1 时间: 2013-10-1 10:28
我看逻辑都是看原文提到的东西有没有和选项有关。
这个原文最重要的一句话是“Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P”,那么也就是说答案一定要解释为什么O会有fewer "job-related" accidents。选项B Company P holds more safety inspections than does Company O 只能是一个政策,它没有解释也不能成为O有fewer job-related accidents的原因,因此选项A更准确!
回答的有点晚了,也是我的潜见,希望能有所帮助!