ChaseDream

标题: 求助!PREP07 第37题 代词指代的很费解~~~ [打印本页]

作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-24 15:54
标题: 求助!PREP07 第37题 代词指代的很费解~~~
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

(A) or
(B) nor
(C) or are
(D) nor are they
(E) nor are not

题干如果只剩下主谓宾的话应该是“many school have computers to use them efficiently”吧?如果这儿的them指的是computers的话,那正确答案D里的they不是和them指代的就不一样了么?
有哪位大神能赐教啊??
作者: Joehe2010    时间: 2013-8-24 16:57
they和them在同一个句子里面可以指代不同的同喜
如果them指代的东西要和they是一样,那么应该用themself,用them的话是错误
作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-24 17:59
Joehe2010 发表于 2013-8-24 16:57
they和them在同一个句子里面可以指代不同的同喜
如果them指代的东西要和they是一样,那么应该用themself, ...

可是貌似曼哈顿还有XDF都说过,一句话中同一代词的变形(如they, them, their)只可能指同一事物呃~
作者: Joehe2010    时间: 2013-8-24 18:18
呵呵,不要印象流,找到原文再看一次
作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-24 23:05
Joehe2010 发表于 2013-8-24 18:18
呵呵,不要印象流,找到原文再看一次

曼哈顿英文原版第237页中间部分,“Repeated pronouns are presumed to have the same antecedent. That is, every it and its in the sentence must refer to the same singular noun; every they, them, and their must refer to the same plural noun.”
亲,你怎么看?
作者: Echo.    时间: 2013-8-25 09:23
选项D, nor are they
这里应该refers to many schools, not computers~
nor are many schools likely to have...


作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-25 10:59
Echo. 发表于 2013-8-25 09:23
就算你要选D, nor are they....they也是错的
这里应该refers to many schools, not computers~
nor are man ...

感谢这位童鞋……但是我有问题,这题答案不是选D么?照你这么说D也有问题了?
作者: Echo.    时间: 2013-8-25 13:31
maoshi888 发表于 2013-8-25 10:59
感谢这位童鞋……但是我有问题,这题答案不是选D么?照你这么说D也有问题了? ...

诶= =sorry,刚刚一匆忙把C选,看成nor are了。
随后就一个劲地在那边debedebe的很开心,
谢谢更正!

但关键被你这么一说发现,就算是nor are 也是错的。。
主要是这里的结构应该是nor + helping verb + subject.。。。



作者: Joehe2010    时间: 2013-8-25 19:14
maoshi888 发表于 2013-8-24 23:05
曼哈顿英文原版第237页中间部分,“Repeated pronouns are presumed to have the same antecedent. That  ...

看Ron大神的回答
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post35718.html

they actually must refer to different antecedents; if they referred to the same antecedent, the latter would have to be "themselves" instead of "them".

analogy:
... she looked at her ... --> one woman is looking at another woman. (this sentence is not ok unless it's a component of some larger parallel structure that elucidates the pronouns, but you get the point)
... she looked at herself... --> a woman is looking at herself.
作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-25 22:27
Joehe2010 发表于 2013-8-25 19:14
看Ron大神的回答
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post35718.html

明白了!谢谢!
作者: maoshi888    时间: 2013-8-25 22:28
Echo. 发表于 2013-8-25 13:31
诶= =sorry,刚刚一匆忙把C选,看成nor are了。
随后就一个劲地在那边debedebe的很开心,
谢谢更正!

哈哈,是的呢~我只是对于前后代词的指代很费解……不过你分析一下我对这个结构是影响深刻了
作者: mysonnic    时间: 2014-11-15 13:02
完了,看了帖子反而不懂了,如果按照D选项来,第一个they指代many schools,第二个them指代computers,那不就和曼哈顿里的they,them在一个句子中必须指代同一个东西矛盾了吗?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3