ChaseDream

标题: FeiFei-75(lawyer该标题) [打印本页]

作者: 小毛毛虫 时间: 2005-1-3 19:17
标题: FeiFei-75(lawyer该标题)

[求助]费费逻辑75题

75. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

A. The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

B. Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

C. The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

D. People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

E. It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

为什么选C.我不太理解这道题目的意思

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2005-1-3 20:29
原文推理：因为一份报纸要改为多注重sex and violence，有些广告商就不在这些报纸上登广告。所以这些广告商不登广告的原因是反对出版淫秽材料。C说这些广告商如果没退，其产品销量会上升，退，则产品销量会下降。C实际上排除一个它因----不是利益让他们不登广告。

作者: 小毛毛虫 时间: 2005-1-8 00:03

thank you very much

作者: tankobe 时间: 2010-4-8 00:37
当时没看懂C;
其实感觉A也可以，表明：厂商不是因为要减少总广告量的原因[因为广告又投放到其他杂志，总广告量不变]，而撤掉改版杂志的广告。
将A取非，总广告量下降---证明是本来要建设总广告投放量的原因，而非因为杂志改版---削弱结论。

作者: fjatpku 时间: 2010-4-8 09:19
但A也可以理解成广告商的广告对象只是family member
就是说这些广告商可能是因为读者群体变了所以才不继续投放广告了
这样的话反而削弱结论了。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)