ChaseDream

标题: GWD 一道逻辑题 [打印本页]

作者: ljwqlcl881703 时间: 2013-8-20 10:40
标题: GWD 一道逻辑题
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

ASmithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
BThis year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
CThis year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
DThe majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
EMore than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

想问下A正确答案的逻辑是不是这样的：因为S大学跟其他大学找less-likely donate 的成功率人频率一样说明S大学在找这些曾经未捐款的成功率是处于一个平均值往往处于平均值之上的都是优秀的fundraiser 所以就说明S大学的80%成功率都是找的以前的熟儿人所以就加强了文章结论是这么理解的么？

作者: mygg_1314 时间: 2013-8-22 19:00
看了LZ的解释才明白了这道题为什么应该选A~这样理解逻辑很顺啊
当时错选了D，第二次做还是觉得D没问题，能否解释一下~~~MUA~

作者: ljwqlcl881703 时间: 2013-8-25 14:49

mygg_1314 发表于 2013-8-22 19:00
看了LZ的解释才明白了这道题为什么应该选A~这样理解逻辑很顺啊
当时错选了D，第二次做还是觉得D没问题，能 ...

D说为SU大学集资的大部分捐款是来自之前从来没给大学捐款的捐款人这样说明这些集资人争取过来的金钱扩大了集资的基数转而说明这些集资人是成功的不削弱了么 0 0 我是这么理解的！！！不知道对否！

作者: mygg_1314 时间: 2013-8-25 18:40

ljwqlcl881703 发表于 2013-8-25 14:49
D说为SU大学集资的大部分捐款是来自之前从来没给大学捐款的捐款人这样说明这些集资人争取过来的金钱 ...

多谢多谢~~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)