ChaseDream

标题: OG 13 SC 112 求解! [打印本页]

作者: derekd0331    时间: 2013-8-19 13:51
标题: OG 13 SC 112 求解!
112.  Construction of the Roman Colosseum, which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheather, began in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian, was completed a decade later, during the reign of Titus, who opened the Colosseum with a one-hundred-day cycle of religious pageants, gladiatorial games and spectacles.
A.
which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheather, began in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian,
B.
officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, begun in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and
C.
which was officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, began in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and
D.
officially known as the Flavian Amphitheater and begun in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian it
E.
officially known as the Flavian AMphitheater, which was begun in AD 69, during the reign of Vespasian, and


刚分析完112,又做113关于baby vision那道题,里面有关于Mahattan 讲到关于comma使用的原则,就是当两个谓语有同样主语时,用and or等连接时,不加comma可省略主语,但如果加上comma,连词后面就一定要补齐主谓宾。例如  
Wrong: Earl walked to school, AND later ate his lunch      Right: Earl walked to school AND later ate his lunch
      Right: Earl walked to school, AND HE later ate his lunch.
依据这个原则,113 baby vision那道题A\B就可以排除,但巨大的疑问就是112这道题正确答案C选项:constuction of...began....and was completed...这里为何没有补出主语?不是跟mahattan讲的违背吗?请NN指导 万分感谢·

作者: Vivian1091    时间: 2013-8-19 14:28
菜鸟飘过~

OG中确实有这样的问题。我个人的理解是mahattan说的逗号 和平行的使用原则,没有问题,而且在大部分的情况下都是成立的。但就如这道题一样,constuction of...began.... ,and was completed...,这个general rule也有例外的时候。

如果你排除到只剩两个答案了,这两个答案唯一的不同就是 用逗号隔开了两个谓语,一个补出主语了,另一个没有补出,那么你肯定选补出主语的。
作者: zhouting321    时间: 2013-8-19 15:10
我没看manhattan,但个人觉得吧,during在这里只是一个插入语而已,你也可以理解and前没有逗号。。。
作者: qiongle    时间: 2013-8-19 18:35
因为两个动词之间有个插入语during啊,两个逗号才能构成一个插入语,去掉也是两个一起去,你去掉了不就是began and was了么?
作者: derekd0331    时间: 2013-8-20 08:40
qiongle 发表于 2013-8-19 18:35
因为两个动词之间有个插入语during啊,两个逗号才能构成一个插入语,去掉也是两个一起去,你去掉了不就是be ...

嗯哪,我就是想问,是不是但凡有逗号,不管是因为插入语前面放逗号,还是什么形式都没有就放了逗号,都需要补出主语,还是说遇到类似只是一个插入语等情况,是可以看做去掉那个插入语部分后,就是没有逗号的情况呢?
作者: qiongle    时间: 2013-8-20 09:28
derekd0331 发表于 2013-8-20 08:40
嗯哪,我就是想问,是不是但凡有逗号,不管是因为插入语前面放逗号,还是什么形式都没有就放了逗号,都需 ...

这题缺失没有必要补出主语,另外‘,and’后面补出主语不是必须的,也可以说是nonessential,不是致命错误点。

Whereas the honeybee's stinger is heavily barbed and cannot be retracted from the skin, because the yellow jacket has a comparatively smooth stinger, it is therefore able to be pulled out and used again.
Abecause the yellow jacket has a comparatively smooth stinger, it is therefore able to be pulled out and used
Bthe comparative smoothness of the yellow jacket's stinger allows them to pull it out and then can therefore use it
Cthe yellow jacket's stinger is comparatively smooth, and can therefore be pulled out and used
Din comparison, the yellow jacket's stinger is smooth, and thus able to be pulled out and used
Ein comparison, the yellow jacket has a smooth stinger, thus allowing it to be pulled out and used

这道题选C, ,and can 主语是stinger  ,同样的他没有补出主语但却是正确答案,做题的时候我们不能钻牛角尖,而是宏观的去把握住句子。

作者: derekd0331    时间: 2013-8-22 09:10
qiongle 发表于 2013-8-20 09:28
这题缺失没有必要补出主语,另外‘,and’后面补出主语不是必须的,也可以说是nonessential,不是致命错 ...

嗯,谢谢你的解答:)加油
作者: abc791201064    时间: 2013-9-2 10:07
Vivian1091 发表于 2013-8-19 14:28
菜鸟飘过~

OG中确实有这样的问题。我个人的理解是mahattan说的逗号 和平行的使用原则,没有问题,而且在大 ...

标点神马的  比较可靠的就是通过逗号看能否是限定性非限定性定语 which that 其他的标点符号判断是不是一个独立的句子 其他的情况 比如这 就有点随意了 不那么可靠 我感觉




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3