ChaseDream

标题: 一道CD搜不到的费费逻辑题求教各路大神 129 [打印本页]

作者: 瓶中的雨燕 时间: 2013-8-13 23:10
标题: 一道CD搜不到的费费逻辑题求教各路大神 129
129. Behind the hope that computers can replace teachers is the idea that the student’s understanding of the subject being taught consists in knowing facts and rules, the job of a teacher being to make the facts and rules explicit and convey them to the students, either by practice drills or by coaching. If that were indeed the way the mind works, the teacher could transfer facts and rules to the computer, which could replace the teacher as drillmaster and coach. But since understanding does not consist merely of knowing facts and rules, but of the grasp of the general concepts underlying them, the hope that the computer will eventually replace the teacher is fundamentally misguided.
Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the author’s conclusion that computers will not eventually be able to replace teachers? D
(A) Computers are as good as teachers at drilling students on facts and rules.
(B) The job of a teacher is to make students understand the general concepts underlying specific facts and rules.
(C) It is possible to program computers so that they can teach the understanding of general concepts that underlie specific facts and rules.
(D) Because they are not subject to human error, computers are better than teachers at conveying facts and rules.
(E) It is not possible for students to develop an understanding of the concepts underlying facts and rules through practice drills and coaching.

题目如上。。貌似不难，但是！就是不能明白，哪位高人能指点一下，不胜感激~

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-8-14 09:18
答案LZ是不是给错了C才是吧~？
C直接填补了BUT SINCE后面的空缺啊~
D是无关的。。。
ORZ。。。

作者: 瓶中的雨燕 时间: 2013-8-14 12:11

xiqiong 发表于 2013-8-14 09:18
答案LZ是不是给错了C才是吧~？
C直接填补了BUT SINCE后面的空缺啊~
D是无关的。。。

D确实是我自己的答案额。。就是不明白为什么C正确，感觉那个specific就不对嘛。。

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-8-14 13:54

瓶中的雨燕发表于 2013-8-14 12:11
D确实是我自己的答案额。。就是不明白为什么C正确，感觉那个specific就不对嘛。。 ...

But since understanding does not consist merely of knowing facts and rules, but of the grasp of the general concepts underlying them,
这个是原文给出的反驳者的观点。
It is possible to program computers so that they can teach the understanding of general concepts that underlie specific facts and rules.（这里specific不影响，意思是 underlie那些具体的facts and rules啊什么，只是一个简单的添加，不影响意思)

D错在没有反驳反驳者的观点。
反驳者说，你虽然可以做A，但是少了B，所以不行。
D就只是说，我做A做得很好很好的啦~
管你做A好不好~卖萌木有用~ 少了B，反正就是不行~

作者: 瓶中的雨燕 时间: 2013-8-14 20:36

xiqiong 发表于 2013-8-14 13:54
But since understanding does not consist merely of knowing facts and rules, but of the ...

原来如此~明白不少耶~原来没有掌握方法，要痛戳弱处

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)