ChaseDream

标题: [求助]一道逻辑题 [打印本页]

作者: catherine27629 时间: 2013-8-13 16:59
标题: [求助]一道逻辑题

F：We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F's point of view to counter G's point?

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for science illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adquate results by testing drugs in the tset tube without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.

答案是E，请问 A错在哪里。原文要削弱G，G说我们应用动物试验否则用药的人会死。 A选项我认为可以理解成即使不做动物试验，人也不会死，因为有的试验无关紧要。请教一下。

谢谢！

作者: Joehe2010 时间: 2013-8-13 23:49
A说一样和原文没有关系的东西，原文是说药品实验，所以题目应该和药品实验有关
E是最好的反驳在于，G把活体动物实验当成了唯一的药品实验方式，E提供了另外一种替代方式。

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-8-14 09:12
LZ是不是理解错了。。。
我为什么没有懂LZ对A的解释。。。ORZ....
F：我们不能牺牲动物的利益，它们和我们一样知道疼。
G：我们必须要做，要不我们会牺牲人的利益。
Q：F会用哪个观点反驳G呢？
A,即使化妆品不必要用，化妆品还是在以动物试验。（完全木有关系啊，第一，药物≠化妆品，第二，支持反驳反了）
D，只是维护了G
E，我们可以不牺牲动物的利益而取得人类的目的。（无痛的试验）BINGO！

作者: catherine27629 时间: 2013-8-14 14:53

xiqiong 发表于 2013-8-14 09:12
LZ是不是理解错了。。。
我为什么没有懂LZ对A的解释。。。ORZ....
F：我们不能牺牲动物的利益，它们和我们 ...

谢谢！我把cosmetic 忽略了。。。这就是无关选项啊，我太二了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)