ChaseDream

标题: Prep2012-Pack1-CR-028 VCR000739 为什么啊 [打印本页]

作者: miffyflysky 时间: 2013-7-21 15:19
标题: Prep2012-Pack1-CR-028 VCR000739 为什么啊

[url=]Mall[/url] owner: Our mall's occupancy rate is so low that we are barely making a profit. We cannot raise rents because of an unacceptably high risk of losing established tenants. On the other hand, a mall that is fully occupied costs about as much to run as one in which a rental space here and a rental space there stands empty. Clearly, therefore, to increase profits we must sign up new tenants.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The mall's operating costs could be cut by consolidating currently rented spaces in such a way that an entire wing of the mall could be closed up.

B. The mall is located in a geographic area in which costs incurred for air-conditioning in the hot summers exceed those incurred for heating in the mid winters by a wide margin.

C. The mall's occupancy rate, though relatively low, has been relatively stable for several years.

D. The mall lost tenants as a result of each of the two major rent increases that have occurred there.

E. None of the mall's established tenants is likely to need additional floor space there in the foreseeable future.

答案选A
可是原文不是说满租和空阻的大厦都一样的运行成本吗那关掉大厦的一部分也对费用没有影响啊？？？

本题木有帖子讨论过求NN
顺便问一下 prep2012有没有pack-2呀

作者: jj1400 时间: 2013-7-21 15:50
先看BCDE.
B明显无关
C，rate稳定不稳定也无所谓，跟profit无关
D：看似像对的，因为说了，租金增加后商铺都走人了（引诱你去想，“那当然不能增加租金了”。）不过是错的，因为结论并不是想加强“不能增加租金”这个结论，而是想说提高利益要怎样怎样，所以D错
E：注意这个是说的是现有的商铺不需要更多的地方，可是结论说的是新的商铺，所以这个无关。

最后看A
要削弱的结论是“提高利润必须增加商铺”。 A说出了另一种增加利润的方法，那就合并一些现有商铺，然后整个wing of market可以关。这样就可以削弱成本，那么当然就增加利润了。对于你的疑惑，原文说的是，在“商场不关但是有些空位的情况下”，cost一样。可是A中，是整个wing of market都关了。所以是两回事。

作者: miffyflysky 时间: 2013-7-21 16:00

jj1400 发表于 2013-7-21 15:50
先看BCDE.
B明显无关
C，rate稳定不稳定也无所谓，跟profit无关

wing of market是不是把mall的一部分关掉？

作者: jj1400 时间: 2013-7-21 16:05

miffyflysky 发表于 2013-7-21 16:00
wing of market是不是把mall的一部分关掉？

是的

作者: miffyflysky 时间: 2013-7-21 16:27

jj1400 发表于 2013-7-21 16:05
是的

噢这里是说空着就还要运行费而关掉的话就不要了这样吗

作者: jj1400 时间: 2013-7-21 19:19

miffyflysky 发表于 2013-7-21 16:27
噢这里是说空着就还要运行费而关掉的话就不要了这样吗

对

作者: udsifhi 时间: 2015-5-21 22:13
我觉得这道题C也挺有道理的。。。那么多年来都招不到新租客，所以现在找到更多人租概率也很小呀，所以这个计划不可行。为什么不能削弱？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)