ChaseDream

标题: 求解答~~~~~~~~看了好多帖子依旧不明白~~~~~~~~~~~~ [打印本页]

作者: 陶星儿    时间: 2013-7-19 16:52
标题: 求解答~~~~~~~~看了好多帖子依旧不明白~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
答案是B  但是我选的是D  

削弱结论不就是说要证明就算之前成功的公司提高价格,被挤掉的竞争者也不会再去和他竞争。

  D的意思不就是说 那些被挤掉的竞争者 一旦决定不再开那条线路,就会把资源转到其他路线上,而不会这是缩小 规模。  既然这样,就算之前成功的那家提高价格,被挤掉的也不会去竞争啊,毕竟他已经关闭了那条线路了啊。

求解释~~求指导~~

作者: 陶星儿    时间: 2013-7-20 10:31
顶一个~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3