ChaseDream
标题: OG13 SC-87逻辑主语的问题 [打印本页]
作者: 半夏死磕GT 时间: 2013-7-8 22:25
标题: OG13 SC-87逻辑主语的问题
87. According to scientists who monitored its path, an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, which brightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocking out a communications satellite.
(A) an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, which brightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocking
(B) an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun was what recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, and it brightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocked
(C) an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, brightening the Northern Lights and possibly knocking
(D) a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, recently triggered by an expanding cloud of energized particles, brightened the Northern Lights and it possibly knocked
(E) a large storm in the magnetic field surrounding Earth was recently triggered by an expanding cloud of energized particles, brightening the Northern Lights and it possibly knocked
答案是C;其实我不能理解的是，为什么主语是cloud不能是storm，模拟云的脚步/模拟暴风雨的脚步不是都可以吗？
作者: bellausa 时间: 2013-8-30 20:15
我想谁的路线被模拟了并不是这题的突破口，或者如果不是相关专业也很难突破，感觉还是要看原文的逻辑含义，即是谁brighten the NL和knock out a cs。
作者: fogetdream 时间: 2013-9-2 22:44
按照NN 们的解释 ，ving, 这个V的逻辑主语应该是前一句的主语， 可是这道题的逻辑主语是cloud 这样理解cloud brighten 好像理解不通。
对,ving 越来越迷茫
up 希望有人来解释一下
作者: fogetdream 时间: 2013-9-2 22:47
the"comma + ing" modifier should only be used when:
(A)
itMODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THESUBJECT of that clause;
AND
(B)
oneof the following is true:
(1)the "ing" action is SIMULTANEOUS with, and SUBORDINATE to, the mainaction;
-i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly
(2)the "ing" action is a DIRECTAND IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE of the mainaction.
-i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91
再顶一下， 按照这个规则 怎么解释这道题呢
作者: keith祤 时间: 2013-9-5 19:06
这个brightening&knocking 就是主句“cloud triggered a storm"的immediate consequence 啊
作者: saki爱吃鱼 时间: 2013-10-15 16:54
悄悄的顶起来。。。。看了很多解释还是不懂
我总觉得应该是storm brightening,而不应该是cloud brightening....
作者: HyeHye 时间: 2013-10-22 03:56
按OG的解释来说，The timing and logical relationships among the events described in this sentence are of utmost importance. The scientists monitored a cloud ejected from the Sun. The cloud triggered a large storm, whose consequences were the brightening of the Northern Lights and the possible knocking out of a satellite. The latter two events are in a conjunction, so they should be represented by similar verb forms. 换句话说，brightening ... and knocking ... 是the cloud triggered a large storm的伴随结果，无逻辑主语。在-ing做状语时，逻辑主语的判断：
(1)表伴随动作、状态、功能，与句子谓语动作同时发生，逻辑主语等于句子主语
(2)表伴随结果，整个句子是原因，导致分词动作产生，无逻辑主语。（除非该名词就是主语）
作者: muxiadai 时间: 2013-11-11 21:56
saki爱吃鱼 发表于 2013-10-15 16:54 
悄悄的顶起来。。。。看了很多解释还是不懂
我总觉得应该是storm brightening,而不应该是cloud brightening ...
你好，这是我看到的DUKB24大神的解释，希望可以帮到你：http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-764753-1-1.html
作者: YvaineDing 时间: 2013-12-11 05:09
那这题中which的用法是不是错误的？which可以修饰整个句子么？
作者: 吉曼特托夫 时间: 2014-8-21 10:24
YvaineDing 发表于 2013-12-11 05:09
那这题中which的用法是不是错误的？which可以修饰整个句子么？
我也感觉A选项的which离storm太远，而且感觉B选项的it指代主语cloud，也不合适。
作者: a1exzeze 时间: 2014-9-11 23:49
吉曼特托夫 发表于 2014-8-21 10:24
我也感觉A选项的which离storm太远，而且感觉B选项的it指代主语cloud，也不合适。 ...
顶一下 顺便说说自己的疑问 我在SWU上面找到的详解说 which不能指代整句话 但是百度又发现可以啊 不过可以肯定的是 V-ING做结果状语是没问题的。恩 应该没说错吧
作者: 猫小雯雯 时间: 2014-11-21 19:53
a1exzeze 发表于 2014-9-11 23:49
顶一下 顺便说说自己的疑问 我在SWU上面找到的详解说 which不能指代整句话 但是百度又发现可以啊 不过可 ...
在曼哈顿里面说了which是不可以指代一个句子的，这个GMAT里面的规定~~但是在雅思里面就可以这么写
作者: FQY315 时间: 2015-5-19 17:31
问了manhattan的instructor,答案是：
basically, "X did Y, making Z happen" means ...
... X didn't directly make Z happen,
but
... Z happened because X did Y.
in any case, it's certainly possible that more than one version of the sentence might work.
e.g.,
I sang a beautiful song, making the audience smile.
I sang a beautiful song that made the audience smile.
these two sentences express very similar, but not identical, ideas. the first emphasizes my personal role in bringing happiness to the audience, while the second downplays my personal influence, instead emphasizing the role of the song itself.
similarly, it's possible that "a cloud triggered a storm that did xxx" would also work here.
作者: FQY315 时间: 2015-5-19 17:32
关于ｖ－ｉｎｇ主语不是主句主语，即ｃｌｏｕｄ的原因
作者: 悠悠爱田 时间: 2015-11-13 15:54
很棒的解答，似乎有些明白了！
作者: 悠悠爱田 时间: 2015-11-13 15:55
之前做过ving修饰的题目，说基本所有的which和ving做修饰的选择中，v-ing 永远是指代最近的词语，然而which可以跳跃几个词指代。
作者: chensiduo 时间: 2016-9-11 16:17
大神！你解决了纠结我良久良久的问题！！！
作者: 最后一条大口鲢 时间: 2016-10-5 16:21
其实这道题 直接看后面的 and 并列就可以很简单地选出答案啊 我开始也doing纠结了很久
作者: 御寒 时间: 2017-1-11 20:45
DE选项丢东西了啊，cloud(ejected from the sun)丢掉了，通过这个就可以排出DE了
作者: paddy114 时间: 2017-11-21 21:31
哇，这段话找了好久
作者: 二十二笑 时间: 2019-11-17 22:15
同意！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |