ChaseDream

标题: OG12 SC第7题 [打印本页]

作者: ciciyo 时间: 2013-7-6 22:34
标题: OG12 SC第7题
请大家指教，不甚感谢
7.As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.（E）
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
(E) it would in the past have conceded to rivals

这OG对D的解释让我好忧伤啊：The placement of "in the past" makes it unclear whether it is supposed to modify "rivals" or "would have conceded“；if the latter,then it is redundant.

1、我实在没看出来这个in the past 可以修饰rivals又可以修饰would have conceded啊，我觉得D除了previously 和in the past有重复外，逻辑修辞上面不存在问题吧···
2、D和正确答案E相比不就是把在E中间的in the past 放在句尾了么··file:///C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/PB%7B22DH8F7000_@B%7D%25P2BAH.gif

作者: suzibi 时间: 2013-7-7 08:52
D错在previously和in the past用词重复

作者: ciciyo 时间: 2013-7-15 11:03
恩，谢谢~~这个是OG的解释，不过OG除了解释这个redundant之外，还说了in the past的修辞问题。。。

我表示我看不出来呀···

作者: zjnyforever 时间: 2013-7-15 11:26
rivals in the past修饰rivals也可以理解成修饰这个句子，不明确。

作者: ciciyo 时间: 2013-7-15 15:50

zjnyforever 发表于 2013-7-15 11:26
rivals in the past修饰rivals也可以理解成修饰这个句子，不明确。

谢谢！秒懂了！！！

我自己把自己绕进去了。。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)