ChaseDream

标题: 一道Not but 的并列题。纠结了一下午了。请大家帮忙！ [打印本页]

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-7-6 16:44
标题: 一道Not but 的并列题。纠结了一下午了。请大家帮忙！
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

(A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are

(B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are

(C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but

(D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are

(E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are

I am not clear why the answer is D. "~are not ~, but are~" doesn't seem parallel. Rather, "~are not ~, but ~" in C seems better. Thank you.

Ron 的解释是歧异Good question.

RonPurewal wrote:

there are two ways of reading the sentence if choice c is inserted. here they are, with the boldface in each indicating exactly what is construed as a modifier:

1) Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored because they enhance reproduction or survival, but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments. --> this is the most obvious reading

2) Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection, favored because they enhance reproduction or survival, but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments. --> counterintuitive if you know anything about evolutionary biology, but grammatically ok -- and therefore a competing interpretation, which is fatal to clarity.

Hi Ron, I still have trouble understanding the second reading.

I believe that if we remove the part "favored because they enhance reproduction or survival" the ambiguity disappears

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are not the products of natural selection,but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments.

Correct me if I'm wrong please. Therefore "but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments" cannot refer to natural selection in the second reading. Also I don't know what kind of modifier it would be

"natural selection (noun) ,but simply random by-products (noun)

what does "but simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments" then refer to?

thank you in advance.

Your first thought here probably was - and should be - parallelism. However, you're right that 'are not ... but are' and 'are not ... but' would both be legitimately parallel constructions in this context. So, the reasoning goes, we should take the one with one fewer word. Right?

Here's the problem: In the context of this longer, more complicated sentence, the 'but' (without 'are' after it) is, unfortunately, ambiguous. Consider this sentence:
Jimmy was not the typical class president, loved by most of the students, but hated by a fair number as well.
The most probable reading here is that all of the words 'loved by most of the students, but also hated by a fair number as well' are a description of 'the typical class president.' However, it's also possible that just "loved by most of the students" describes that phrase. So there are 2 interpretations:
1) Jimmy was not the typical class president, loved by most of the students, but hated by a fair number as well. --> in which the entire colored description attaches to “the typical class president”
2) Jimmy was not the typical class president, loved by most of the students, but hated by a fair number as well. --> in which “the typical class president” is described as someone who is loved by most students; in this instance, jimmy is contrasted with the typical class president because some people also hate him.

If you look at choice C, it can be read this way; one could (probably should, even) take ALL the words '...favored because they enhance reproduction or survival, but simply random byproducts...' as an elaboration on the phrase 'products of natural selection'.
It's harder to see than in the example of Jimmy, above, for two reasons:
(1) Because of the way the original sentence is written, you're biased toward reading the sentence the way it's 'supposed' to be written. (In the example with Jimmy, there's no prompt sentence, so you're free to read it as you like.)
(2) It's longer.

Hope this helps.

。但我和这个孩子的疑惑一样：

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-7-6 16:47
用手机发的。格式实在对不住。。。我想问第二种歧异是什么状况？省略了什么？两个名次结构并列不是很对称么？

作者: kevinlovett 时间: 2013-7-17 08:45
hi B选项中due to 不如because好 OG貌似有这方面说明， are not....but.....这个结构很对称啊我一站g也是惨败信心被打击死了准备二战你也是准备今年申请吗？还有你现在念大学几年级？

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-7-17 08:51

kevinlovett 发表于 2013-7-17 08:45
hi B选项中due to 不如because好 OG貌似有这方面说明， are not....but.....这个结构很对称啊我一站g也是 ...

下学期就大四了~额。。。哈~ 本来昨天该考试的。。。然后默默不小心迟到了。。。⊙﹏⊙b汗。。。。25号北京二战~ 要信心满满啦~ 加油！

作者: kevinlovett 时间: 2013-7-17 08:56

xiqiong 发表于 2013-7-17 08:51
下学期就大四了~额。。。哈~ 本来昨天该考试的。。。然后默默不小心迟到了。。。⊙﹏⊙b汗。。。。25号 ...

你还好啦我今年6月刚毕业天天宅在家里感觉人森脱节了周围朋友工作的工作，读研的出国的，就剩我了，之前就是因为G不好没去申请，对了，你哪个大学哇?

作者: xiqiong 时间: 2013-7-17 09:26

kevinlovett 发表于 2013-7-17 08:56
你还好啦我今年6月刚毕业天天宅在家里感觉人森脱节了周围朋友工作的工作，读研的出国的，就剩我了， ...

哈~ ~遥远的哈工大。。。~ 加油~还有三个月~赶这一波能行的~！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)