ChaseDream
标题: lsat-4-1-25（lawyer改标题） [打印本页]
作者: catree 时间: 2004-12-29 07:17
标题: lsat-4-1-25（lawyer改标题）
25
Because of the recent transformation of te market.Quore,Inc.,must increase productivity,10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however,Quore's production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
答案：e) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.
但是 Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years. 也有道理，为什么不选这个呢。
作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-12-29 09:08
请贴全题，特别是问题问的是什麽
作者: catree 时间: 2004-12-29 09:46
不用了，刚刚明白。
作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-16 17:25
這個行為很不可取。
人家幫你回答問題, 你既不說感謝, 同時之間也不會體恤論壇上面大家互助的基本禮儀禮貌以及同理心。
阿你會了有沒有顧慮到別人不會？ 這種行為基本上就是自私。
來論壇問問題既不道謝也不換位思考, 考試考再多分也沒有用啦！
作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-16 17:26
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?
(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.
全題在此
作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-16 17:39
Spot the question type: Must be true -> necessary assumption
core of the argument:
Recent transformation of the market ---> Q increase p by 10 of next 2 years or Q will bankrupt.
If increase by 10, then it must be able to increase by 20.
( If not be able to increase by 20, it must not be able to increase by 10 ---> Q will bankrupt )
A. If survive the transformation of the market, it must be q's production structure
1. it is not really relevant to the argument.
2. we only know that under the sufficient condition as to survive the transformation, we must have either a or b as the necessary condition. But we do not know if only the production structure could alone determine whether Q be able to survive or not.
B. This is a mistaken reverse answer.
If no 20, then no 10, if no 10, then bankrupt. Now, it said If 20, then no bankrupt. It should be If no bankrupt, then 20.
C. Mistaken negation.
D. We are dealing with the conditional logic within the argument, and this answer attempts to confuse you by the causation.
E. If no 20, then no 10, if no 10, then bankrupt. ( Correct answer just as we predicted. )
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |