ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-0210-1-21（lawyer改标题） [打印本页]

作者: lilyzy 时间: 2004-12-27 23:12
标题: LSAT-0210-1-21（lawyer改标题）

21. Some educators claim that it is best that school courses cover only basic subject matter, but cover it in depth. These educators argue that if student achieve a solid grasp of the basic concepts and investigatory techniques in a subject, they will be able to explore the breadth of that subject on their own after the course is over. But if they simply learn a lot of factual information, without truly understanding its significance, they will not be well equipped for further study on their own.
The educator’s reasoning provides grounds for accepting which one of the following statements?
(A) It is easier to understand how plants and animals are classified after learning how plants and animals can be useful
(B) It is more difficult to recall the details of a dull and complicated lecture than of a lively and interesting one.
(C) It is easier to remember new ideas explained personally by a teacher than ideas that one explores independently.
(D) It is easier to understand any Greek tragedy after one has analyzed a few of them in detail.
(E) It is easier to learn many simple ideas well than to learn a few complicated ideas well.
请叫本题的思路.

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-12-29 20:38

1。这是原文支持选项题，即Must be true题

2。答案D来源于原文第二句话

作者: lilyzy 时间: 2004-12-29 21:21
明白了. 谢谢lawyer

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-17 16:19

lilyzy 发表于 2004-12-27 23:12
21. Some educators claim that it is best that school courses cover only basic subject matter, but co ...

Spot the question type: Must be true / Principle

The conclusion of the educators:

If the school course could be the best, then it must be covering only basic subject in depth.

Supporting evidence:

1. If achieve a sold grasp of the basic concepts and investigatory techniques in a subject, they will be able to explore the breadth of the subject on their own after the course is over.

2. If they simply learn a lot of factual information without understanding it, they will not be well equipped for further study of their own

What can we infer from the above 2 reasoning premises?

1. Not be able to explore the breadth ---> not being able to achieve a sold grasp and techniques

2. Be well equipped for further study of their own ---> learn factual infos " and " understanding.

Let us dive into the answers ( provide ground to accept on conclusion )

A. We do not know if classifying both the plants and animals are easier than knowing whether those can be useful.

B. Its not about the comparison between the details of due and complicated and it of lively and interesting one.

C. Its not about the comparisons of who to teach could be better understood between teachers and self learning independently.

D. Ok, you understand the factual information, and you truly understand the informations, So you well equip for further study of your own.

E. Its not the comparisons of being easier between simple ideas and complicated ideas.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)