IR:没什么太多印象,印象最深的就是那个75 108 的~~在JJ看过,但是一鸡冻发现就秒选成了75 175~~悲剧
还有一个关于卖苹果的~~一个是cost 一个是revenue~~都是上升的趋势~~
有一个就是一个什么表演 S T D R F貌似不是这几个字母,就是五个东西排序,大概意思就是S必须在T之前,D在R之前,并且两个之间要有表演。两个问题一个问可能是最后一个或者其他地方的是,还有一个貌似是可能是最后一个还是什么的去了。。就注意条件,排列一下就好了~~~呜呜~~
估计我IR做的很怂~~因为都很不确定~~唯一确定的还只答对了一半~~只能说重在参与了~~
Q:感觉有一些JJ 的~~但是数量不太记得了~~~
我最记得的是哪个机经里面的坐标轴上AB=BC貌似是这个~~问六个点的那个题目~~问题其实是问different value of BC(就是未知的线段)~~当时我还纠结了很久~~还是选了6个
貌似有很多跟根号有关的的题目~~
比如2乘以十的三次方根等于多少~~~差点选成了40的三次方根~~注意是三次方根~~所以应该是 80的三次方根
还有是利用平方差的~~具体数字不记得了~~总之就是要注意(x+y)(x-y)=x的平方-y的平方
还有最后一个题目是那个“gap”题~~就是很多人纠结了很多次的~~2-29的质数~~那个翻译的确很纠结~~不过我秒选了~~嘻嘻~~
还有关于增长率的~~具体不记得数字了~~就是增长率就是(期末的值-期初值)除以期初值~~
还有中了那个4P的~
考到了关于三角形的~~两个图~~DS~~左边三角形知道长~~高~~右边的只知道一个边~~貌似是铺东西之类的。。具体不记得了~~
真的是挑战记忆极限,都是模拟记忆啊。。呜呜~~
V:真的可以说是in a chaos~~完全没感觉~~结果也考的很水~~
SC 考了几个so that~~
还有do so~~
并列~~
than do~~
还有like~~
具体题目不记得了~~
语法真的是句意优先啊~~呜呜
CR:就记得机经的题目。。。呜呜~~
RC:一个新题貌似说的是人们什么时候登录美洲还是什么地方的~~然后展开的讨论~~具体也不记得了~~
Transportation to the New World is a big topic for debate. 提出问题If the early Americans did cruise巡航 around the continent in canoes and kayaks, might the first settlers have arrived by boat as well? For decades the archaeological community rejected this notion (Ice Agehunters could never have carried all their weapons and left over mammoth meat in such tiny boats!), but in recent years the idea has gathered more support.旧观点反对经由海路假说
One reason for the shift: the nagging困扰的 problem of just how fast people can make the journey from Alaska toTierra del Fuego. 旧观点的问题症结点Consider Dillehay's 14,700-year-old Monte Verde site. According to the previously accepted timeline, people could have made the journey from Asia on foot no earlier than 15,700 years ago(before this time, the ice sheets extending from the North Pole covered Alaskaand Canada completely, making a land passage impossible). If this entry date is correct, the Monte Verde find would indicate that the first settlers had to make the 12,000 -mile trip through two continents in only 1,000 years. In archaeological time, that's as fast as Marion Jones(地球上跑得最快的女人). 提出反对旧观点的理由:行走速度太快? One way to achieve this pace , however,would be by traveling along the Pacific coastlines of North and SouthAmerica in boats. 转折, F提出海路假说新观点Knut Fladmark, a professor of archaeology at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, BC, first suggested this possibility in the 1970s and remains an advocate of a coastal entry into the Americas. If people had a reason to keep moving, he says, they could have traversed both continents in 100 years. 支持理由:速度符合Fladmark estimates that traveling at a rate of 200 miles a month would have been quite reasonable; the settlers no doubt stopped during winter months and probably stayed in some spots for a generation or so if the local resourceswere particularly tempting. Fladmark's theory, though enticing won't be easy to prove. 让步,提出缺陷Rising sea levels from the melting Ice Age glaciers in undated thousands of square miles along the Pacific coasts of both continents. Any early sites near the ocean that were inhabited before 13,000 years ago would now be deep underwater. 新观点的弱点Recently a few enterprising researchers have attempted to dredge挖出 up artifacts from below the Pacific. In 1997, for example, Daryl Fedje, an archaeologist with Parks Canada (which runs that country's national parks system), led a team that pulled up a small stone tool from 160 feet underwater just off the coast of British Columbia. 提出证据证明新观点The single tool, which Fedje estimates to be around 10,200 years old, does establish that people once lived on the now submerged land but reveals little about the culture there. Excavating underwater sites might turn out to be the only way to prove when humans first arrived on this continent.提出对证据的质疑? And for many researchers this is still a very open question 因为证据力不足,海路说尚未定论, with answers ranging from 15,000 years ago to as far back as 50,000 years ago. When Fladmark first proposed the idea of a coastal migration, the entry date of 14,000 or 15,000 years ago was orthodoxy.公认的,持普遍赞同的