ChaseDream

标题: OG-21 （没有找到先前的相关解释） [打印本页]

---

作者: karen125    时间: 2004-12-26 17:14
标题: OG-21 （没有找到先前的相关解释）

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpe­trators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

请问，but表达的转折意思体现在哪儿呢？前后不都是（为）perpetrators在开脱罪名么？

多谢赐教！

---

作者: karen125    时间: 2004-12-26 23:10
没人搭理，自己顶一下吧——

---

作者: joe11    时间: 2004-12-27 06:36
前面是解释罪名的，but 后是讲罪名如何不合理的。

---

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)

Powered by Discuz! X3.3