Leslie Demeniuk, who is facing the death penalty for the murder of her 4-year-old twins in March 2001, contends in her Dec. 9 brief that the Fifth District Court of Appeal erred when it overturned a trial court's order denying the state's motion for a Frye hearing and on Nov. 9 overruled her motion for a rehearing because its findings conflict with numerous Supreme Court decisions regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in capital cases.
question: what has happened to the Frye hearing mentioned in the pasage?
Frey hearing is a state's motion, first a trial court's order rejected the motion, then the FDCA overturned the order, that is, the FDCA accepted the Frye hearing
on Nov. 9 the FDCA rejected LD' motion for Frye rehearing because the FDCA questioning the credibility of Frye hearing due to super court decision.
am I right?
75percent right
LD think FDCA erred because its findings(裁定) conflict with the binding precedents。
I think only two things happend to Frye:
1. Fifth District Court of Appeal grants the state's motion for a Frye hearing.
2. Fifth District Court of Appeal overruled her motion for a rehearing on Nov. 9
The rest has nothing to do with Frye.
chelseayang
What's your opinion?
it's not tough at all
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |