ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-11-1-13 [打印本页]

作者: hades    时间: 2004-12-21 02:56
标题: LSAT-11-1-13

13. Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to reform the electoral process, the president clearly acted in the best interests of the nation. Anyone who thinks otherwise should remember that the president made this decision knowing it would be met with fierce opposition at home and widespread disapproval abroad. All citizens who place the nation’s well-being above narrow partisan interests will applaud this courageous action.


The reasoning in the editorial is in error because


(A) it confused a quality that is merely desirable in a political leader with a quality that is essential to effective political decision-making


(B) it fails to distinguish between evidence concerning the courage required to make a certain decision and evidence concerning the wisdom of making that decision


(C) it ignores the likelihood that many citizens have no narrow partisan interest in the proposed


(D) it overlooks the possibility that there was strong opposition to the parliament’s plan among members of the president's among members of the president's own party


(E) it depends on the unwarranted assumption that any plan proposed by a parliament will necessarily serve only narrow partisan interests



答案:B


对B的解释及原文的主题还是不太明白,请指点。谢谢!


作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2004-12-21 07:07
原文的推理是:因为President有勇气经受住反对,所以他是以国家最好利益为行为准则,每个市民都该支持他。这个GAP就在有勇气不一定决定就智慧。即B
作者: songgigi    时间: 2008-4-12 14:53
?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3