ChaseDream

标题: 关于SVO，ving修饰的一个小问题 [打印本页]

作者: 扣肉儿 时间: 2013-6-8 11:04
标题: 关于SVO，ving修饰的一个小问题
在SVO，ving结构中，如果谓语含有情态动词，后面可以用ving修饰么？是不是根本就没有这种用法？
例如：OG 13-115 的C选项
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tinv islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, thev have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

作者: bejamin1111 时间: 2013-6-8 11:52
不是情态动词的原因，这里这个错误是因为句子逻辑关系和合理重心的改变

作者: 扣肉儿 时间: 2013-6-8 21:36

bejamin1111 发表于 2013-6-8 11:52
不是情态动词的原因，这里这个错误是因为句子逻辑关系和合理重心的改变
...

嗯这个我知道的，只是想问问ving是不是不能修饰情态动词，如果不能，C就可以很快的被排除了。
可以么？

作者: bejamin1111 时间: 2013-6-8 22:34

扣肉儿发表于 2013-6-8 21:36
嗯这个我知道的，只是想问问ving是不是不能修饰情态动词，如果不能，C就可以很快的被排除了。
可以么？ ...

情态动词一定后面跟了实义动词哇，情态动词又没有实际的意义。。。

作者: 扣肉儿 时间: 2013-6-10 17:14

bejamin1111 发表于 2013-6-8 22:34
情态动词一定后面跟了实义动词哇，情态动词又没有实际的意义。。。

但是情态动词比如must是表示一种可能性的，ving应该不可以作为adv modifier修饰“一定会坐某事”吧？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)