ChaseDream

标题: 关于代词怎么才算有歧义 [打印本页]

作者: abc791201064 时间: 2013-6-3 09:37
标题: 关于代词怎么才算有歧义
40. (26555-!-item-!-188;#058&002661)

With an awareness that there are connotations associated with the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters
A and B, companies conducting consumer taste tests of foods or beverages typically choose
numbers such as 697 or 483 to label the products.

(A) With an awareness that there are connotations associated with the numbers 1 and 2 and the
letters A and B
(B) Because the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B have connotations they are aware of
(C) Because of an awareness of the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B having connotations
(D) Aware of the connotations of the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B
(E) Since the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B have connotations associated with them and
they are aware of it

考点:       简洁有效（Rhetorical Construction）、指代一致（Agreement）
1)       介词短语

n account of, because of, despite (in despite of), as a result of之后只跟简单的名词短
语。若其后面跟的是动名词或名词所有格+动名词短语(sb’s doing),或名词短语之后用一复杂的现在分
词来修饰时,应改为与其相同意义的连词because, although等引导的从句形式。
2)       指代歧意

(A)       句子结构不够简洁
(B) they指代不清,       既可以向前指代numbers, letters又可以向后指代companies
(C) Because of + n + having…表现复杂,应该改为Because从句

(D)       正确, aware of       置于句首修饰companies,       句子结构简单,意思清晰
(E) have connotations associated with them表达复杂;they指代不清,it无指代

句子结构: Aware of the connotations of the numbers…and the letters…, companies… typically
choose…

这个题目的(B) 说 they指代不清,       既可以向前指代numbers, letters又可以向后指代companies

指代LETTERS语法上有可能逻辑上不太可能说不通啊  那么就只有知道COMPANIES 了这不就不歧义了？？？

作者: kiwifoodtown 时间: 2013-6-3 10:26
我觉的they完全可能指代the numbers…and the letters…, companies…任何一个，所以很歧义。

作者: htl9043 时间: 2013-6-3 11:03
语法上成立就能构成ambiguous了吧，和逻辑成立与否没关系的。。。个人是这么理解的

作者: abc791201064 时间: 2013-6-3 11:08

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-6-3 10:26
我觉的they完全可能指代the numbers…and the letters…, companies…任何一个，所以很歧义。 ...

但是指代了字母或者数字语义上说不通啊我刚才正好看MHT的时候感觉是不是这个意思只要语法上说的通全部都算歧义尽管语义上可能说不通

作者: abc791201064 时间: 2013-6-3 11:11

htl9043 发表于 2013-6-3 11:03
语法上成立就能构成ambiguous了吧，和逻辑成立与否没关系的。。。个人是这么理解的 ...

嗯哪我刚才看MHT的时候正好有这个部分也感觉是只要语法上有可能都算歧义了即使语义上说不通

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)