ChaseDream

标题: 天山 3-Q19 [打印本页]

作者: beautywawa    时间: 2004-12-18 20:00
标题: 天山 3-Q19

天山 3-Q19 verbal-SC


A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.



A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that



B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that



C. reserves, as a result, they feared that other countries would



D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would


E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would



求教解題思路,我怎麼看都覺得怪怪的..而我竟然選B..昏


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-18 20:02:19编辑过]

作者: Springfield    时间: 2004-12-18 22:22
以下是引用beautywawa在2004-12-18 20:00:00的发言:

天山 3-Q19 verbal-SC


A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.



A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that


this单独出现,肯定错误;




B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that


which不可指代前面整个句子,错;




C. reserves, as a result, they feared that other countries would


run-on,错;




D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would


with修饰,错;


E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would


doing作伴随结果,correct;



求教解題思路,我怎麼看都覺得怪怪的..而我竟然選B..昏




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-18 22:22:56编辑过]

作者: beautywawa    时间: 2004-12-18 23:07
謝謝,,好詳細的解釋,,,
作者: new_new    时间: 2005-3-19 17:24

这道题我选的是E,但是对C有点困惑。我下载的这套题C不是RUN-ON啊,因为中间那个符号是分号而不是逗号,这样不就是两个独立的句子了吗

C. reserves; as a result, they feared that other countries would


作者: colacat    时间: 2005-3-19 18:38
they  不对,无指代
作者: joe11    时间: 2005-3-30 00:34

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that

     在 and 前需要逗号; Logic error:  不是 fear of other countries, 而是 fear other countries 的动作和结果。

B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that
   which不可指代前面整个句子,错;  -- springfield

C. reserves; as a result, they feared that other countries would

    as a result 该承接关系不对, they 可以指代 panel (集体名词)

D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would

   with fears raised 不好

E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would


作者: valarie    时间: 2005-3-30 13:27
以下是引用joe11在2005-3-30 0:34:00的发言:

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.



A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that


     在 and 前需要逗号; Logic error:  不是 fear of other countries, 而是 fear other countries 的动作和结果。


B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that
   which不可指代前面整个句子,错;  -- springfield




C. reserves; as a result, they feared that other countries would


    as a result 该承接关系不对, they 可以指代 panel (集体名词)




D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would


   with fears raised 不好


E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would


Agree on Joe's analysis on A,B,D.

C. I guess it's not necessarily just "they" who will fear. It could be other people's fears. That's why "they" is not suitable here.

Just FYR.


作者: WalkByFaith    时间: 2005-7-4 02:27

Agree with 'which不可指代前面整个句子', however, i still pick up B.


Reasons:


1. E would change the original meaning. Who will fear? Swiss or other countries?


   Original sentence: other countries' fear.


   E: Swiss's fear, not correct.


2. in B, 'which' does not necessarily reprsent the previous sentence, it could represent 'gold reserves'


NN, please more discuss, thanks.


作者: yukon    时间: 2005-7-4 11:10

我不是NN


E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would


fears前面有个修饰更好,没有也不是硬伤,从句意来看fears绝对不是other countries' fear,是指市场投资者的fear


B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that

大全里有fear of sth的例子,B的意思是“对这些国家的恐惧”,而不是“对这些国家采取相似行动的恐惧”


作者: yukon    时间: 2005-7-4 11:12
这句话怎么特别像《国际金融市场》课本里的一段??
作者: mmfoolish    时间: 2005-10-3 14:41
请问谁可以解释一下D为何不对?with 结构放在句末是否也可以修饰前面的内容表示一种状态或者伴随结果?我总是把句末的with结构和分词结构搞混,哪位可以帮忙解释一下?谢谢!!!
作者: seekmydream    时间: 2005-10-13 07:07


A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.


A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that
     在 and 前需要逗号; Logic error:  不是 fear of other countries, 而是 fear other countries 的动作和结果。


    还有this不可指代前面句子的内容
B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that
   which不可指代前面整个句子,错;  -- springfield
C. reserves; as a result, they feared that other countries would
    as a result 该承接关系不对, they 可以指代 panel (集体名词)


as a result并没有什么错,C错在they的指代不清,即使they可指代panel,逻辑上有问题,


总不能panel提出一政策,然后又对自己的做法感到fears.那就不做bie!


D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would
   with fears raised 不好


with+n(fears that...)+过去分词: 独立主格,可以修饰主句, 语法上没问题.问题在逻辑意思,过去分词有已完成的,被动的意思,说明fears被什么东东raised了,但看不出是前面panel的做法导致的结果.这与原意不符.


其二,with fears raised独立主格有伴随状态的意思(体会一下OG131monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging...这句with arms and legs hanging 修饰sleeping), 似乎在说瑞士政府带着fears干什么东东...



E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would


现在分词短语表伴随结果.就是它了!



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-13 7:09:06编辑过]

作者: liu_9000    时间: 2005-11-12 19:04


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-12 19:09:35编辑过]

作者: katie83    时间: 2006-6-12 14:48

B的句义不对是主要原因我觉得,因为Swiss抛售黄金的行为导致公众害怕其他国家也抛售导致黄金大跌,


作者: katie83    时间: 2006-6-12 15:20

with fear raised的逻辑主语应该是句子主语Swiss p, 这与句义不符, 因为不是p本身使人担心,而是那个行为.

我说的对么?


作者: dudegmat2006    时间: 2006-7-11 20:33

E;

A-run-on sentence, plus, "fears of" is awkward and unidiomatic;

B-"as a result" is unnecessary and should be omitted, plus, "which" incorrectly refers to "gold reserves" (the relative pronoun "which" cannot refer to an entire clause, but only to the nearest antecedent noun) and "fear of," again;

C-"they" has no clear referent, and even if it did, "panel" requires the singular "it;"

D-wordy, awkward, passive construction, which is corrected in E.


作者: flyingceleste    时间: 2006-8-4 14:41
D我为什么就不能理解成:A Swiss government panel 是带着怎么怎么样得一种恐惧而建议。。。。。?用with,我觉得可以得啊?动名词强调一种动作,持续状态,而名词才是表结果,我觉得D更好,open to discuss。。。
作者: eyda_c    时间: 2006-9-14 20:40
以下是引用beautywawa在2004-12-18 20:00:00的发言:

天山 3-Q19 verbal-SC

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that

B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that

C. reserves, as a result, they feared that other countries would

D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would

E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would

求教解題思路,我怎麼看都覺得怪怪的..而我竟然選B..昏


题目好像贴错了:

E. reserves, raising fears that other countries

之所以没有would,是不是因为虚拟(省should)?


作者: dreamchaserdan    时间: 2007-2-12 23:18
以下是引用katie83在2006-6-12 15:20:00的发言:

with fear raised的逻辑主语应该是句子主语Swiss p, 这与句义不符, 因为不是p本身使人担心,而是那个行为.

我说的对么?

你说得很对


作者: muffyy    时间: 2007-2-22 16:11
以下是引用katie83在2006-6-12 15:20:00的发言:

with fear raised的逻辑主语应该是句子主语Swiss p, 这与句义不符, 因为不是p本身使人担心,而是那个行为.

我说的对么?

我選D

with引導的獨立主格不是沒有逻辑主语的問題嗎

還是我記錯了?

還請哪為大大指點迷津,謝謝^^


作者: wangwei8581    时间: 2007-4-11 17:51

我觉得E 改变了原句的意思。

原句说,引起了其他采取同样行动国家的恐惧——是那些国家的恐惧。

E 说是引起了瑞士对那些采取同样行动国家的恐惧——是瑞士恐惧。

我找不到好的答案。。。。。求助啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


作者: uvoice    时间: 2007-6-18 12:38

这道题,为什么不能是D,WITH的独立主格作原因状语,因为害怕其他的国家也会跟随这样做,因此P才会建议COUNTRY买掉黄金储备。


作者: uvoice    时间: 2007-6-18 14:39
请NN帮忙看看。
作者: uvoice    时间: 2007-6-19 01:45

自己在定义下`~~


作者: ssl507    时间: 2007-7-19 16:37

怎么回事?这题在GWD答案是D

我支持D,答案E明显改了原句意思

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half of its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

这句话的意思是, swiss 的专家因为害怕其它国家sell their gold而占领整个市场,所以推荐swiss政府出售一半黄金储量,with作伴随原因,修饰主语。其它的意思都完全不对。


作者: Amyfly    时间: 2007-7-23 22:09
但是D的话有个问题啊,with fears raised that.... that 修饰fears,但是被raised隔开了,虽然GWD另一题目有这种用法的争论,我个人觉得这样的修饰是不正确的.
作者: ligaoping    时间: 2007-8-12 15:37
以下是引用ssl507在2007-7-19 16:37:00的发言:

怎么回事?这题在GWD答案是D

我支持D,答案E明显改了原句意思

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half of its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

这句话的意思是, swiss 的专家因为害怕其它国家sell their gold而占领整个市场,所以推荐swiss政府出售一半黄金储量,with作伴随原因,修饰主语。其它的意思都完全不对。

同问!

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half of its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

  1. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that

  2. reserves, which, as a result, raised fears of other countries that

  3. reserves, as a result, they feared that other countries would

  4. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would

  5. reserves, raising fears that other countries

另外如果E是正确答案的话,前面用了过去时,recommended 为什么后半句用现在时do呢 ?D选项用would有效的避免了这个问题。

请大家帮忙看看!


作者: wsdoll    时间: 2007-8-28 14:16
我下载的选项E没有would, 又觉得D也不错。
作者: CloseToU    时间: 2007-10-30 21:05

我觉得应该选D,

E 改变了原句的意思


作者: spyder1011    时间: 2007-11-19 05:04

有没有大侠可以出来澄清一下,这题的E究竟有没有would,我手头的版本没有,而lz贴的有。


作者: 阿土莎莎    时间: 2007-11-27 12:22

up

E有没有would的到底。。。混乱。。


作者: lokoolo    时间: 2008-5-20 19:51

各位大人請教一下

為何D不好呢? 有些題目答案不是也可以用WITH嗎

此外,E的raising 不會有模糊不清 究竟前面的主詞或是前句的問題嗎

附加的句子做越多我越模糊

另外 我在某些文法書上 其實有看過which跟that都能代替句子 似乎ets倒是從沒出現過這樣的用法

煩請賜教 感謝!

   
作者: xxy870128    时间: 2008-6-28 14:52
以下是引用joe11在2005-3-30 0:34:00的发言:

A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that

     在 and 前需要逗号; Logic error:  不是 fear of other countries, 而是 fear other countries 的动作和结果。

B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that
   which不可指代前面整个句子,错;  -- springfield

C. reserves; as a result, they feared that other countries would

    as a result 该承接关系不对, they 可以指代 panel (集体名词)

D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would

   with fears raised 不好

E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would

在GMAT中好象没有集合名词这个概念啊   写的是单数就是单数  写的是复数就是负数啊  唯一的一个就是DIABETES 在OG 11TH YELLOW的里面有啊 ETS的一个陷阱就在这里   其他的我做的题就是复数形式就是动词单数   单数名词就是动词复数啊   可能我做的不够多 TO BE DISCUSSED


作者: 夜凉如水    时间: 2008-7-21 18:02

选项E 没有WOULD

当初在D,E里面徘徊,看到d的would就选了

with的话确实修饰有歧义,但是ing就没有么?

请指教,谢谢。


作者: blove001    时间: 2008-8-7 20:48

我认为还是E正确。


A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.

D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would

我觉得D有两个问题:

1.  raise的动作发起者是谁呢?

2. swiss和别的国家哪个先卖?

如果说意思是瑞士因为担心别的国家卖,于是先卖,似乎这么表达更好一些:

with fears that other countries would sell the gold and ..., a swiss government panel recommended that the country do the same ...

E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would

在E中,raising可以看做修饰前面这句话,因为swiss sell gold,引起了别的国家的恐慌,所以他们也可能做同样的事。


作者: blesspig    时间: 2008-9-26 17:32

Fears
   raised that traffic-light ratings system could split PCTs

在网上查到有一个这样的句子, Fears
    raised that 应该没有问题吧~~

支持D


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-26 17:33:21编辑过]

作者: Justin12122    时间: 2009-7-14 14:13

E改变了句子的意思。。

原文的意思是 fears of other countries,
而E错误的修改为:Swiss raise fears that...

fears原本是其他国家本身产生的,不是swiss发出的。

anyway, 支持D..


作者: lyz100618    时间: 2009-8-26 09:36

感谢各位nn们的提醒,原来也是错选了D,

突然想到:

独立主格表示伴随的原因,条件,状态

D中的独立主格在此处应用不是很恰当同时也改变愿意,原文reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.     THIS表明前面发生的事是后面fears的原因,而后半句为结果,因而此处用独立主格改变了原文的因果关系,逻辑上与原文有分歧,故而错

E正确“,doing”表示结果,通常情况下doing作定语时前面不加逗号,加逗号多表示伴随状态或者是结果。

TO BE DISCUSS


作者: sprins    时间: 2009-9-3 16:58
以下是引用muffyy在2007/2/22 16:11:00的发言:

我選D

with引導的獨立主格不是沒有逻辑主语的問題嗎

還是我記錯了?

還請哪為大大指點迷津,謝謝^^

虽然过了很久...............

with引导独立主格时确实不存在逻辑主语的问题 但应该明确 那是针对with后的分词/adj./介短等而言的 因为分词/adj./介短的逻辑主语就是with后的n. 也就是说with独立主格不考虑逻主的问题是限定在独立主格结构之内的 可是放眼整个句子 with独立主格这个整体结构是要在句子中做一个成分的 如状语 那就要考虑整个结构的修饰对象 如在本句中是govenment

所以D改变了原句的意思 支持E 


作者: hlp1222    时间: 2009-10-5 21:14

我在想 如果with结构作状语修饰前面的谓语动词

但是前面有两个 一个是recommend 一个是sell,

那with到底应该修饰谁了?

指的是不是就是这个歧义??

瞎想的  请多多指教


作者: jean1280    时间: 2009-10-8 01:28
E里面没有说清楚到底谁fear,D则说明panel在建议的同时也有fear,所以D比E更清楚更好
作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-10-14 20:08

不同意选 D。

单从保持原意上说,raise fears... 是结果。

A:... this raised fears of...

B、C:...as a result...

E:现在分词 raising 表结果。

而逻辑上如果要表示伴随,raised 则是多余了。而且 panel 带着 fears 建议也非常 awkward.

语法上 D 没大错,但在保持意思和逻辑上漏洞太多了

因此选 E。


作者: doyoga    时间: 2009-11-10 10:27
晕~我打印的版本E选项最后没有would......
排除ABC后,被迫选了D~
作者: singletonboy    时间: 2009-11-19 06:35
恩,感觉还是应该有would,支持D
作者: sayysong    时间: 2010-1-2 23:51
找了下原句,出自NYTIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/25/business/fears-of-a-sale-by-swiss-send-gold-plunging.html?pagewanted=1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold prices plunged to the lowest level in more than 12 years yesterday after a Swiss Government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves, raising fears that other countries would do the same and inundate the market.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E得加个would才对。否则无论就时态上还是虚拟语气省略should上来评价都不对。
作者: mirabelwong    时间: 2010-5-3 00:46
找了下原句,出自NYTIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/25/business/fears-of-a-sale-by-swiss-send-gold-plunging.html?pagewanted=1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold prices plunged to the lowest level in more than 12 years yesterday after a Swiss Government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves, raising fears that other countries would do the same and inundate the market.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E得加个would才对。否则无论就时态上还是虚拟语气省略should上来评价都不对。
-- by 会员 sayysong (2010/1/2 23:51:46)





楼上牛人!居然找到原句。
之前选了D 纠结了好久 终于被说服了
先看原句,and this raised fears 说明fears发生在recommendation后面
根据句义,D说的是“带着fears去recommend”   改变了原文的意思
hence E

作者: 369966065    时间: 2010-7-25 09:24
44#哥们nb啊。
作者: kily8878860    时间: 2010-11-15 17:28
我不是牛牛,再来说一下
我觉得这种fear等主观意愿的名词,动词,形容词之后表示虚拟语气,would、should可省略
这是OG里常见的

ABC可以排除,我就不说了
DE的差别就在于fear的主体到底是减少黄金储量的国家还是公众
这里还是公众比较好
如果瑞士自己担心那还提出这个预案做什么呢

这句就说,瑞士减少黄金储量可能会增加公众对于其他国家发生相似行为的担心

不知道对不对,不过我之前也是选择D了,还是觉得E合理,呵呵
作者: genieoy    时间: 2011-4-6 20:42
以下是引用beautywawa在2004-12-18 20:00:00的发言:
天山 3-Q19 verbal-SC
A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about half its gold reserves and this raised fears of other countries that do the same and inundate the market.



A. reserves and this raised fears of other countries that




B. reserves, which , as a result, raised fears of other countries that




C. reserves, as a result, they feared that other countries would




D. reserves, with fears raised that other countries would
E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would

求教解題思路,我怎麼看都覺得怪怪的..而我竟然選B..昏

题目好像贴错了:
E. reserves, raising fears that other countries
之所以没有would,是不是因为虚拟(省should)?

-- by 会员 eyda_c (2006/9/14 20:40:00)





我也在想这个问题,在怀疑是不是把would给省略了
作者: feeling1206    时间: 2012-3-28 10:44
E有woud就解释的通了 否则逻辑意思很怪
作者: chicr    时间: 2014-10-3 16:09
所以rasing修饰的是啥...
作者: song910    时间: 2015-10-30 01:55
chicr 发表于 2014-10-3 16:09
所以rasing修饰的是啥...

raising 应该修饰的是recommendation 的结果。swiss 政府提出的建议导致恐慌




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3