The milk of many mammals contains cannabinoids, substances that are known to
stimulate certain receptors in the brain. To investigate the function of cannabinoids,
researchers injected newborn mice with a chemical that is known to block cannabinoids
from reaching their receptors in the brain. The injected mice showed far less interest in
feeding than normal newborn mice do. Therefore, cannabinoids probably function to
stimulate the appetite.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Newborn mice do not normally ingest any substance other than their mothers’
milk.
B. Cannabinoids are the only substances in mammals’ milk that stimulate the
appetite.
C. The mothers of newborn mice do not normally make any effort to encourage their
babies to feed.
D. The milk of mammals would be less nutritious if it did not contain cannabinoids.
E. The chemical that blocks cannabinoids from stimulating their brain receptors does
not independently inhibit the appetite
MINE B
ANS E
不明白啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=74754&page=1 |
奇怪,为什么我的天山的这个题号的题目是
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |