Oscar: I have been accused of plagiarizing the work of Ethel Myers in my recent article. But that accusation is unwarranted. Although I admit I used passages from Myers’s book without attribution, Myers gave me permission in private correspondence to do so.
Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.
5(C). Which of the following principles, if established, would justify Oscar’s judgment?
(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.
(B) The writer of an article must cite the source of all passages that were not written by that writer if those passages are more than a few sentences long.
(C) Plagiarism is never justified, but writers are justified in occasionally quoting without attribution the work of other writers if the work quoted has not been published.
(D) An author is entitled to quote freely without attribution the work of a writer if that writer relinquishes his or her exclusive right to the material.（D）
(E) Authors are entitled to quote without attribution passages that they themselves have written and published in other books or articles.
Is it possible that Myers gave Oscar permission in private correspondence to use passages from Myer’s book means that Myers relinquishes her exclusive right to the material?
Why not A? A infers that if the author of that other source has granted the writer permission to do so ,a writer has right to quote passage from another published source
firstly, Myers gave Oscar permission to use passages from Myer’s book does means he relinquish exclusive right of his book. exclusive means no others, just himself. If someone else is entiled the right, it is no longer a exclusive right.
secondly, I feel you have gone too much in inference. Do not read more out the passage than it states. Moreover, your inference of a is not necessarily true. In general, when you have a if-then statement, it allows you to infer something in just two case:
1. you can infer that "then" condition is met from knowing that "if " condition has occurs
2. you can infer from knowing that "then" condition is not met that "if " condition does not occurs
above generalization is plagiarizing a nn's post, can not indicate the true author because I don't remenber.
I misunderstood the "exclusive right " as "exlusive right to be the author"instead of "exclusive right to use the passage". I had thought Myers must be insane if he gives up his exclusive right to be the author just because he gave Oscar permission to use his passage
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |