ChaseDream

标题: 天山-9-3 [打印本页]

作者: neverback    时间: 2004-12-16 23:49
标题: 天山-9-3

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they
fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit
communication up and down the corporate hierarchy
. Since an executive who uses a
title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an
executive’s dealings with external businesses
. The obvious compromise is for these
executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is
widely known that the corporation’s executives use executive titles outside their
organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the
corporation.
In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?
A. The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a
reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.
B. The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the
second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.
C. The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the
second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.
D. The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of
that support.
E. The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the
evidence offered against that belief.


MINE E


ANS B


请指教


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-17 1:53:51编辑过]

作者: Shuaishuai    时间: 2004-12-17 01:07

我选B。最吻合题目思路,先说因为担心使用头衔影响上下级交流(consideration)而禁止使用头衔称呼(strategy),但是这样会影响与外部交往便利(reason against strategy), 最后提出一折中方案(solution没提到)。

E中的evidence 是没有在题中有体现的吧?


作者: neverback    时间: 2004-12-17 01:55

不好意思

刚才BOLDFACE没标出来


作者: neverback    时间: 2004-12-17 01:56
有道理
作者: 华籍美人    时间: 2005-6-17 17:37
我觉得C倒是满贴切的,唉!大家好像都没考虑过C。我的思路大概有问题,难受。
作者: leonchan    时间: 2005-11-13 11:29

The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally


compromise 折衷、妥协


C中dismisses as insignificant完全错误


作者: coffemug    时间: 2005-12-22 09:09

同意B.


作者: kevinZhang    时间: 2005-12-22 13:18

支持B. 两者矛盾后妥协compromise, 问两者的作用,应该一个赞成,另一个反对是合乎原逻辑的表述.


C 我觉得主要是 insignificant,是个无关选项.


作者: maggiecookies    时间: 2006-8-16 16:31

关于CONSIDERATION 是指需要考虑的事项, 这个词在这里非常符合BF1, 于是我锁定B.

而C中出现的CONSIDERATION与BF2不符, 排除.


作者: DawnDavid    时间: 2007-10-15 22:38
回原文分析,为了不影响上下级交流所以不使用头衔,这更符合一个strategy而不是一个evidence.
作者: 夜凉如水    时间: 2008-8-1 17:35
额,- - !,一直认为采取什么才是策略,原来不采取什么也是一种策略
作者: giantwill    时间: 2009-12-31 16:00
up




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3