The reading passage explores the issue of that the best methds of accomplish a task is to assmble a group of people work together. The professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, he thinks that using a group to finish one task is not a wise choice, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, he uses three specific points to support his idea.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that a group of people contributing on one task will work more quickly and efficient, the professor argues in the lecture that the process of the task don't move more quickly when there is a group of people working on it. This is because it takes long time to reach conseus about how to move the task. There will be a lot of meetings and arguments between the memeber of the group, which will be a waste of time and decrease the efficiency.
Moreover, despite the statement made in the reading that the group work will inspire the creative solutions, the professor contends that sometimes the creative ideas will be quickly drop out without discussion and the warning towards the wrong solutions will be ignores because there will be one or two people who are more influencial than others in the group. When a creative idea is dropped and the main leaders in the group show disagreement with it, the idea will be abandoned with deliberately consideration by other members in this group. And the wrong decisions will still be carried on despite some people's warning because they are supported by the influencial people in this group. And when the task failed, they will blamed every memeber in the group.
Finally, the professor assert that taking a part in the group will be very rewarding for the memebers, whereas the professor proves that the author's claim is indefensible by pointing out that since there are lot of people who are on a free ride and don't contribute on the task, the members who provde a lot ideas and didcate themselves in the task will have the oppsite attitude of what the reading mentiones because people will reconginze the success as a whole and no single name will be mentioned.
In concluison, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central agument in the reading is incorrect.
作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-8 13:00
TPO 3 综合写作
The reading passages indicates the issue that the painting mentioned in the passage is a fake work of the Rembrandt. The professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, she thinks that this piece of work is truly accomplished by Rembrandt. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that the fur collar is inconsistent with the status of the woman who is a servant, the professor argues in the lecture that the fur color was added to the paint over the top after one hundred years of when the painting was accoplished by Rembrandt. And this act was intended to improve the value of the painting by make the woman in it like a graceful lady. After removing the added layerm the woman actually wears a simple collar with a light color. Apparently, the professor's argument disprove its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement made in the reading that the light and shadow don't fit together, which can't happen in the work of Rebrandt, the professor contends that after removing the added layer, the woman's face is in part of the shadow, which is very realistic and fit the style of he Rembrandt.
Finally, the professor asserts that the original edition of the painting is only one single piece of wood and other people afterwards also enlarged the painting by gluing other pieces of wood to make it more valuable, whereas the author of the reading claims that it is not the style of Rembrandt to put serval piece of woods together in one painting.Also, the professor proves that the author's claim is indefensible by pointing out that another painting of Remrandt shares the wood from the same trees with this piece of work talked in the lecture.
In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading that painting of the woman is not the true work from Rembrandt, is incorrect. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-8 13:39
TPO 5 综合写作
The reading passage indicate that the dinosaurs are in fact endotherms, and the professor in the leture deals with the same topic. However, she argue that the dinosaurs are not endotherms, which contradicts the counterpart of the author. And she uses three specific evidences to support her idea.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that the fossils discovered in polar regions provid strong evidence to the hypothesis that dinosaurs are enthothermy, the professor argues in the lecture that the climate in ancient times when these dinosaurs lived is much warmer than that today and was enough for their survival. Also, the dinosaur migrate to warmer areas and hibernated in the winter to survive.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the legs of dinosaurs are underneath the body, which is match the characteristic of all modern endotherms, the professor contends that it is unconvicing to draw that hasty cnclusion because there is another more credible explanation of the legs. The legs underneath the body can support more weight, which serves an advantage to the large size dinosaurs who don't need much skill of running.
Finally, the reading asserts that the bone structure called Haversian canals is a strong indicator of the opinion in the passage, whereas the professor displays the fact that there is also growth rings in the bone structure of the dinosaur. It indicates that the dinosaurs stop growing or growing in a much lower speed in cooler periods, and growing faster in warmer periods. This is the typical charcteristic of the unendotherms, which is very different from the enthorms which can keep a rapid growing speed even in cooler periods. 作者: perfectends 时间: 2013-5-8 23:10
姐妹儿，我看你一直练综合，要不我明天也练你练的这几篇，咱俩互改综合吧？作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-9 15:07
好啊，独立也正在写，你的练习也多些，咱们可以互相改喔。。。
终于有人回复我了，好感动~~~~作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-9 16:00
The reading passage explores the issue of the use of the Chaco Canyon and provided three possible hypothesis. The professor in the lecture deals with the same topic, however, he contends that none of the three theory can serve as a perfect answer to the question above. And he displays specific evidence to argue for his view.
First of all, although the first theory holds that the Chaco structures were residential and can contain hundreds of people each, the professor give evidence to support his idea. Even the outside indeed like that of well-known apartment building at Taos, the inside of the Chaco structure cast doubt on the residential theory because there are few fire places which is indispensible if people live here. But even the larger room which have enough rooms for hundreds of families only have ten fire places. Apparetly, the professor diproves the counterpart of the first theory.
Moreover, despite the two theory claims that Chaco structures were used to store food, mainly the grain maize, the professor point out that even the structures are broad and capacious, there are no covered trees and large containers which are the must of the food storage. And if these rooms are for the use of storing food, then more grains should be found in the large containers instead of the on the floor.
Finally, the third theory suggests that the houses were used as ceremonial centers,whereas the professor point out the fact that there are other materials found in the near Pueblo Alto besides the pots, such as buliding materials which used for construction. So the houses are more likely a place where people throw away all materials they used up than a place for ceremony.
The reading passage explores the issue that whether the best method to accomplish a task is to assemble a group of people working together. The professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, he thinks that using a group to finish one task is not a wise choice, which contradicts the author's statement. And in the lecture, the professor uses three specific points to support his idea.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that a group of people contributing themselves on one task will work more quickly and efficient, the professor argues in the lecture that the process of the task don't move more quickly when there is a group of people working on it. This is because it takes a long time to reach consensus about how the assignment will move on. There will be a lot of meetings and arguments between the members of the group, which will be a waste of time and lower the efficiency.
Moreover, despite the statement made in the reading that the group work can inspire the creative solutions, the professor contends that sometimes the creative ideas will be quickly dropped out without discussion and the warning towards the wrong solutions will be ignored because there will be one or two people who are more influential than others in the group. When a creative idea comes up and the principal leaders in the group cast doubt on it, the idea will be abandoned without deliberation by other members in this group. And the wrong decision,supported by the influential people in this group, will still be carried on despite some people's warning. And when the task failed, every single member in the group will be blamed.
Finally, the professor asserts that taking a part in the group will be very rewarding for the members, whereas the professor proves that the author's claim is indefensible. He points out since there are lots of people who are on a free ride, which means they share the success without contributing much on the task, the members who provide a lot of ideas and dedicate themselves in the task will have just the opposite attitude of what the reading mentions because people will recognize the success as a whole and no single name will be mentioned.
In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading is incorrect.
还有7天，fighting ~~`~作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-10 22:25
Whether the job has more effect on people's happiness than the living environment does raise a hot argument among people all over the world, some would say that the living environment is essential because people can get relaxation and enjoy themselves in the free time without worrying about the work. However, I can't convince myself to agree with that opinion. Specific points in several dimensions will be used to demonstrate the correctness of my hypothesis.
First of all, since the job takes up the most part of our day life, the impact of it on our happiness is almost self-evident. Imagine someone has a boring job which drive him crazy on the work time, he might have eight hours a day feel frustrated and be unconfident about himself and the future, which sounds like a nightmare. Even though he has the perfect living environment in the world, the comfortable and luxurious house, the company of the family and a bunch of close friends, he can feel happy at most three hours a day and that happy will be only temporary.Or even when he is in a bar drinking with friends, the delicious food and the relaxing music can't get him out of the blue mood, he will complain to his friends how fussy your boss is and the co-workers are incredibly incapable of their work and hard to communicate with, let alone cooperate with them to accomplish the challeging task of work. How miserable the life will be if one hates his job!
Moreover, the job can bring us finicial assurance, which determines our living environment directly. It is uncontroversial that a comfortable living environment will bring people joy and comfort in the free time. Nevertheless, all the living necessaties such as food, clothes and the furniture all depend on the income from your job.
The last but not least, the sense of accomplishment and self-esteem, which the job bring us, are often the key to the happiness.Your job is the identify card of yourself, people can judge you from what you do and you can know who are you through your job. A doctor can reliaze his value in his work by helping others away from pain and the death, a teacher can get sense of accomplishment by educating the youth of the country, offering them knowledge and skills which are essential to their and the world's future. All these feelings of proud and self-esteem can't obtain from the living enviroment. And according to the theory of happiness, these things directly influence your happiness.
Admittedly, it is unreasonable to ignore the influence of the living environment on people's happiness, I still hold my view that the job plays more indespensible part in the happiness of life when compared with the living conditions because it is the job that offers us the key value of life and the premise of a comfortable living condition. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 01:37
Employees should follow the orders of their bosses rather than proposing new ideas.
Although the universal concept is that the employee should exactly follow the instructions from the boss and do everything one can to accomplish the task, Nevertheless, I disagree with this conventional view and I believe that proposing new ideas should be stressed today instead of just following the orders of their bosses. Specific evidences from several perspectives will be displayed in the following parts of the article to demonstrate my idea.
Initially, one issue which makes me support my viewpoint is that it benefits the company by coming up new and creative ideas. Taking the computer company as an example, with the rapid development of the manufacturing industries and the improvement of the quality of products, almost all the computers in the market can meet what the customers basically need. So just following the bosses' orders to make the computers having as high quality as those of the competing companies can't expand the market share and help the company attract more potential customers, and thus make a profit. Therefore, the employee should take the responsibility of bringing original thoughts to the computer-producing process, such as giving the computer a design make-over or adding multimedia function to attract the modern people who love seeking after the fashion.
Moreover, for the sake of the employee, giving constructive suggestions will enable oneself to make a good impression, a creative and passioned person who loves his job and dedicates himself to his career, to his boss. Thus the young man will have a better chance to get a promotion. And what worth mentioning is, the employee can get the sense of accomplishment and find his own value during the process of expressing himself and witnessing his achievement, which is highly praised by his boss, associating with the reality and eventually influence the world we live in.
Finally, as the role of the boss, it will make him more popular among his employees and build his reputation by listening to others and allowing them to express themselves freely. Also the idea of democracy will be wide-spreaded which can create a more harmonious atmosphere for the whole company.
According to the perspectives displayed in the passage, we can convincingly conclude that the employees should propose new ideas rather than just listen to the bosses because in that case, it will be a win-win thing for the company, employers and also employees. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 12:28
存在问题： 第三人称单复数，，，主谓一致 名词和动名词，动词之间 拼写容易出现字母顺序打错，强健的小拇指惹得祸。。。。 词汇用得不够丰富 ：demonstrate indicate manifest compare weigh too much 不要用了！！！用excessive crack the issue eliminate get rid of bad 天天用烦不烦？？ dreadful be less impressive unfavorable 表示缺点 error fault flaw defect shortcoming 别用mistake 了。。。。 display points defend one's opinion raise the issue explore the issue 还有 the benefits outweigh the disadvantage 注意是 outweigh
模版总结 The reading passage explores(注意拼写）the issue of the and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, the professor contends that . Three points are displayed in the lecture to dispute the author's biased opinion in the article.
First of all, although the author suggests that , the professor defends his or her opinion by raising the issue that
Secondly, the reading also points out that , the professor disprove this claim by stating that
Finally, the lectuer crack the issue that by claiming that
In conclusion, the lecture expolit serval weakness of the reading and powerfully demonstrate that the central argument of the article, is incorrect.
TPO6
The reading passage explores the issue of the weakness of the communal online encyclopedias and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, the professor contends that although the communal online encyclopedias are not perfect and there are indeed some small imperfections exist, its advantages outweigh the disadvantages which is only a small price to pay. Three points are displayed in the lecture to dispute the author's biased opinion.
First of all, although the author of the article suggests that the information provided by the online encyclopedias are often inaccurate, the professor defends his opinion by raising the issue that even the traditional encyclopedias are never close to the perfect and a comprehensive encyclopedias without a single flaw can't be found online or offline. What's more dreadful about the traditional encyclopedias is that the errors there can remain decades.
Secondly, the reading also points out that even the original entry in the online encyclopedias is correct, it can't remain forever due to the access of the vandals or hackers to editting it. The professor disproves the claim by stating that there are some formats in the online encyclopedias,which are believed by everybody and can't be changed by anyone. Also worth mentioning are the existence of the special editors whose jobs are monitoring the contents and eliminating explanations which are apparently incorrect.
Finally, the professor cracks the issue that excessive attention has been put on the trivial issue by claiming that the online encyclopedias solve the problem of limited space, which exists in the traditional encyclopedias and leads to the weakness of only narrowing to the academic fields and not reflecting the real interests of the public. What's more, the representation of the whole society's interest serves as a strong advantage of the online encyclopedias when compared with the traditional books.
In conclusion, the professor exploit the weakness of the reading passage and powerfully demonstrate that the central argument of it, is indefensible. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 13:22
刚发的模版放到WORD 改改居然还有错别字！！！！单词拼写很重要
The reading passage explores the issue of and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, the professor contends that, which contradicts with the reading's standpoint. Three specific evidences are displayed in the passage to demonstrate the professor's opinion.
First of all, concerning the author's claim that, the professor defends his opinion by raising the issue that
Secondly, the reading also points out that, the professor disprove this claim by stating that
Finally, the lecturer cracks the issue that by claiming that
In conclusion, the lecturer exploits several flaws in the reading material and powerfully concludes that the central argument of the article is incorrect. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 16:10
发现把帖子当做自己的练习本和总结本挺不错的。。
下面是独立写作一篇~~~
存在问题： 速度问题 打字和思路一定要快 必须留出2分钟检查拼写错误，否则死的很惨。。。。
易错单词 public responsibility exploit money preserve solve facilities irreversible species contribute 替换的低级词汇 important crucial essential enhance improve benefit
contribute to result in lead to appeal according to =in accordance with
The protection of the wild animals and wilderness areas has been a heated topic to the public since it was raised up. Although the conventional view often suggests that it is the responsibility of the government to protect the wild animals from extinction and preserve the wilderness areas from being exploited for other commercial use, after comprehensively thinking, I still hold my standpoint that it is too naive for the government to spend plenty of money and energy protecting the wild animals and the wilderness areas for the next generation. Three points are displayed in the passage to demonstrate the soundness of my argument.
First of all,as we know, there are a lot of other urgent problems which need to be solved immediately such as the terrible human living conditions in the remote and undeveloped places in the country, the educational facilities for the children are still in short and so on. Obviously, it is unwise for the government to pour millions of dollars to build the natural habits for the wild animals considering these homeless people with no apartment to live in or to prevent the wilderness areas from putting into use to offer accommodation to the tourists. In this case, pouring these money into the educational business instead of protecting the wild animals will benefit the future generation more.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that the wild animals and wilderness areas have essential effect on the environment and the future development of one country, however, under many conditions, the protection of the wild animals and wilderness areas is beyond the power of the whole human beings, let alone the government. It is the natural selection process for some extinction of the wild animals because their living environment don't exist or the loss of the food chain. It is the balance of the environment, which cannot or at least hardly can be changed by the human force and we can't gain anything from the protection of wild animals and wilderness areas but instead the other way around. To be specific, we can't save the dinosaurs from extinction which is an irreversible process.
What's more,since human beings tend to choose the species they prefer or found to be adorable, not the wild animals who contribute the most to the balance of the environment, these measures taken by the government might not reach the original goal to benefit the future generation. For example, government will choose the panda to protect because they are cute and it can attract a lot of tourists by putting them into the zoos.
According to the specific evidences displayed in the passage, we can convincingly conclude that it is not crucial for government to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generation because the task is too tough and complex to accomplish and may lead to dreadful consequences and put themselves into trouble. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 21:11
The reading passage explores the issue that the wood companies don't need to get an eco-certification to attract more customers and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, the professor contends that it can benefit the wood companies in America to gain a eco-certification, which clearly contradicts the author's standpoint. Three points are displayed in the lecture to support his view.
First of all, concerning the first point made in the passage that the American customers don't trust the content of the advertisement due to the excessive claims in general, the lecturer defends his opinion by stating that not all the information provided in the advertisement are treated as the same. Customers in America often find the certification from an independent consumer organization extremely trustworthy. Therefore, it is worth a try for these wood companies to attract more customers and expand the market share.
Moreover, although the price of the woods will be higher just as what the reading material indicates, the factors that determine whether the customer will purchase one product aren't narrowing to the price. Since it won't cost that much to obtain a certification, the wood price will increase nearly five percent, which the customer can accept as a small price to buy eco-certified product because the Americans are increasingly convinced by the value of protecting the environment.
Finally, the professor raises the issue that it is not the foreign market but the foreign competitors that the local woods companies need to worry about, which disproves the statement of the reading that it wouldn't make any sense getting a certificate because their market are mainly on local. These wood companies should catch the pace of the world, avoiding the happening of that situation--the eco-concerned American customers are attracted by the products from foreign countries and the foreign competitors crowd into the local market and take the share of the cake.
In conclusion, the lecturer exploits several weaknesses in the reading material and powerfully demonstrates that the central supporting ideas of it are incorrect. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 21:17
易错单词 foreign foreign foreign foreign foreign several several several several several several several several several foreign foreign foreign foreign foreign foreign be worth doing it is worth a try a must 一般用于口语中 trustworthy=dependable 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-11 22:20
The issue that whether young people should make their own choices without the guidence of the parents has been a heated topic since it was raised up. Others may say the realtionships between the parents and their children are durable and never changed since the first human being exists in the world and today young people also turn to their parents for help and advices when there are big decisions to make. Neverthelss, as far as I am concerned, young people today are more indepedent and they tend to make their own decision and live in the ways follow their heart. Specific points are displayed to further decision of my viewpoints.
First of all, as the modern society are more convinced of the value of education for the youngth, thousands of colloge school are build to give almost everyone the equal access to the knowledge. We don't depend on the experience from the parents because we already are well-prepared for the challenges of the life and are tough and wise enough to make the decision all by ourselves through gaining essential lessons and life wisdom from our teachers, who experienced the same thing as our parents and even more professional when solving certain problems than our parents.For me, when I am struggling about which major to choose in college, I will consult the related professor, who is an expert in this field instead of asking my parents.
What's more, the development of the Internet technology and the popularity of the computer also contribute to the less dependable of the parents when their young children are making decisions. There are tons of information undating on the Internet and everyone have the access to learn from that and pick up the useful information.When my parents were young, they may ask my grandparents about which company to choose when they recieve offers. However, when it's my turn, I, as a representive of this generation will search all the information about the target companies, list all the pros and cons,comprehensively considering all the factor, turn to parents, friends and teachers for advice and then make my own decision.
Finally, as the wide-spreaded of the democracy, people are more indepedent and consider making own decisions is the basic rights of a citizen even the parents can't deprive the sarced right one born with. The freedom to choose is the essential value of the American society and giving their children enough space to decide their future and life pattern is a respect to them. The story of Romeo and Juliet is very rare today because everyone has the right to choose who they fall in love with and who they want to spend the whole life with.
In accordance to the three specific evidence displayed in the passage, we can convincingly conclude that young people today are better able to make decision in their life due to a more democratic society, the rapid development of the modern technology and the more opportunities to obtain further education. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-12 00:26
The reading passage explores the issue of the reliability of the memoir of the Chevalier and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, she contends that the content of the memoir is pretty reliable. Specific points are displayed in the lecture to defend her standpoint.
First of all, altough the author of the article suggests that the Chevalier isn't not as wealthy as he mentioned in the menoir when living in Switz due to the evidence that he borrowed considerable amount of money from a friend, the lecturer disprove it powerfully. She claim that borrowing money from others doesn't necessarily means the poorness of Chevalier, since he spend huge money on parties and gambling, it needs time to change the properties into the actual cash thus it is pretty reasonable to borrow money from friends before the arrive of the actual money.
Secondly, concerning the point made in the article that a man can't remeber all the details of a conversation after so many years, the professor mentions that Chevalier has the habit to wrote the meaingful and exciting things such as the conversation with a celebrity down exactly. And probably he used the dairy book to remind him every details in the process of writing the memoir.
Finally, despite the reading casts doubt on that by using a piece of metal instead of bribing the jailers to escape from the prison caused Chevalier had influenced friends on politics, he professor dispute the hypothesis by pointing out that there are other people in jail, who has even more friend working in politics, who didn't get themselves out of the prison. What also worth mentioning is that proofs about the room Chevalier stayed had been repaired after the date Chevalier escaped, which serves a powerful explanation of the way he escaped from the prison.
Concluding from all three aspects in the passage, the professor powerfully demonstrate that incorrectness of the conclusion made in the reading passage 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-12 00:28
The issue that whether young people should make their own choices without the guidence of the parents has been a heated topic since it was raised up. Others may say the realtionships between the parents and their children are durable and never changed since the first human being exists in the world and today young people also turn to their parents for help and advices when there are big decisions to make. Neverthelss, as far as I am concerned, young people today are more indepedent and they tend to make their own decision and live in the ways follow their heart. Specific points are displayed to further decision of my viewpoints.
First of all, as the modern society are more convinced of the value of education for the youngth, thousands of colloge school are build to give almost everyone the equal access to the knowledge. We don't depend on the experience from the parents because we already are well-prepared for the challenges of the life and are tough and wise enough to make the decision all by ourselves through gaining essential lessons and life wisdom from our teachers, who experienced the same thing as our parents and even more professional when solving certain problems than our parents.For me, when I am struggling about which major to choose in college, I will consult the related professor, who is an expert in this field instead of asking my parents.
What's more, the development of the Internet technology and the popularity of the computer also contribute to the less dependable of the parents when their young children are making decisions. There are tons of information undating on the Internet and everyone have the access to learn from that and pick up the useful information.When my parents were young, they may ask my grandparents about which company to choose when they recieve offers. However, when it's my turn, I, as a representive of this generation will search all the information about the target companies, list all the pros and cons,comprehensively considering all the factor, turn to parents, friends and teachers for advice and then make my own decision.
Finally, as the wide-spreaded of the democracy, people are more indepedent and consider making own decisions is the basic rights of a citizen even the parents can't deprive the sarced right one born with. The freedom to choose is the essential value of the American society and giving their children enough space to decide their future and life pattern is a respect to them. The story of Romeo and Juliet is very rare today because everyone has the right to choose who they fall in love with and who they want to spend the whole life with.
In accordance to the three specific evidence displayed in the passage, we can convincingly conclude that young people today are better able to make decision in their life due to a more democratic society, the rapid development of the modern technology and the more opportunities to obtain further education. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-15 00:03
The issue that whether young people should make their own choices without the guidance of the parents has been controversial among the public since it had been raised up. Others may say the relationships between the parents and their children are durable and never changed since the first human being existed in the world and today young people also turn to their parents for help and advice when there are big decisions to make. Nevertheless, as far as I am concerned, young people today are more independent and they tend to make their own decisions and live in the ways following their heart. Specific points are displayed to further discussion of my viewpoints.
First of all, as people in modern society are more convinced of education's value for the young, thousands of colleges are built to give almost everyone the equal access to knowledge. We don't depend on the experience from the parents because we already are well-prepared for the challenges of the life and are tough and wise enough to make the decisions all by ourselves through gaining essential lessons and life wisdom from our teachers, who experienced the same thing as our parents and are even more professional when solving certain problems than our parents do.For me, when I am struggling about which major to choose in college, I will consult the professor, who is an expert in this field instead of asking my parents.
What's more, the development of the Internet technology and the popularity of the computer also contribute to the less dependable of the parents when their young children are making decisions. There are tons of information updating on the Internet and everyone have the access to learn from that and pick up the useful information.When my parents were young, they may ask my grandparents about which job to choose when they received many offers. However, when it's my turn, I, as a representation of this generation will search all the information about the target companies, list all the pros and cons,comprehensively consider all the factor, turn to parents, friends and teachers for advice and then make my own decisions.
作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-15 11:04
The reading passage explores the issue of the reliability of the memoir of the Chevalier and the professor in the lecture deals with the same topic. Nevertheless, she contends that the contents of the memoir are pretty reliable, which clearly contradicts with the reading. Specific points are displayed in the lecture to defend her view.
First of all, although the author of the article suggests that the Chevalier is not as wealthy as he mentioned in the memoir when living in Switz due to the evidence that he borrowed a considerable amount of money from a friend, the lecturer disprove it powerfully. She claims that borrowing money from others doesn't necessarily means the poor of Chevalier, since he spent huge amounts of money on the parties and gambling, it needs time to change the properties into the actual cash thus it is pretty reasonable to borrow money from friends before the arrive of the actual money.
Secondly, concerning the point made in the article that a man can't remember all the details of a conversation after so many years, the professor mentions that Chevalier has the habit to wrote the meaningful and exciting things such as the conversation with a celebrity down exactly. And probably he used the dairy to remind him of every detail in the process of writing the memoir.
Finally, despite the reading casts doubt on that by using a piece of metal instead of bribing the jailers to escape from the prison caused Chevalier had influenced friends on politics, the lecturer cracks the issue by pointing out that there are other people in jail, who had even more friends working in politics but didn't get themselves out of the prison. What's also worth mentioning is the proof about the room Chevalier stayed had been repaired after the date Chevalier escaped, which serves a powerful explanation of the way he escaped from the prison. 作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-15 11:29
It is more important for schools to fund their students' social activities than to improve students' meals.
The issue that whether it is more important for schools to fund student's activities than to improve students' meals has been a heated topic for the public and the educational experts since it has been raised. Some supporters of the social activities found it be more essential because they think the school should pay more attention about the students' well-around development than the food qualities. Nevertheless, I disagree with that opinion and think it as an opposite way. Specific supporting points in different perspectives are displayed in the passage to demonstrate my opinion.
First of all, the meals directly determine the health of the students, which are the foundation of all their activities including the social participation and the performance of their study. When trying to figure an effective method to solve the problem, I think dealing with it from the principle and the original reason will be the perfect and helpful. If the students don't get the healthy and enough food, they won't have the energy to take part in their task and all kinds of relating events, and that's not we expect from the future generation of the whole country and the whole world. Therefore, from what was mentioned above, we can conclude that improving the meals of the students will benefit them from the basic level and make sure everything involved keep running as it supposed to be.
Moreover, the student's primary task is to focus on their study, It is more important for schools to fund their students' social activities than to improve students' meals.
Moreover, the student's primary task is to focus on their study, obtain knowledge from the teachers and the books and then be well-prepared for their future role in the society. It is undeniable that the social activities take crucial parts to build the students into the well-rounded developed brilliant young people, however, we can't ignore the fact that it is not the principle demand but the compliment task for the schools to help the students better involved in the social activities. It's more like the homework and the students can complete this task on their own to figure out the answer. What's more, the students can try to get finical assistance from the social resources such as getting money from the companies. I have the similar experience to apply finical assistance from one big company successfully by promising them to make advertisement for the the product in the school and this experience is very valuable because it improve my skills of communicating and negotiating with others in real business.
Finally, it is more practical and fair for the school to take the measures into fact. Deciding which activities to fund can be a hard thing and will cause a lot of problems such as the complaints from the students about the fairness of the evaluating process. Also, as eating is a basic needs for everybody, improving meals will benefit all the students and more easy to carry out in the school.
In accordance to the three points made in the passage, we can powerfully conclude the conclusion that it is more important for the school to improve the meals rather that their social activities.
obtain knowledge from the teachers and the books and then be well-prepared for their future role in the society. It is undeniable that the social activities take crucial parts to build the students into the well-rounded developed brilliant young people, however, we can't ignore the fact that it is not the principle demand but the compliment task for the schools to help the students better involved in the social activities. It's more like the homework and the students can complete this task on their own to figure out the answer. What's more, the students can try to get financial assistance from the social resources such as getting money from the companies. I had the experience of applying for financial assistance from one big company successfully by promising them to make the advertisement for the product in the school and this experience is very valuable because it improve my skills of communicating and negotiating with others in real business.
Finally, it is more practical and fair for the school to take the measures into fact. Deciding which activities to fund can be a hard thing and will cause a lot of problems such as the complaints from the students about the fairness of the evaluation process. Also, as eating is a basic need for everybody, improving meals will benefit all the students and is more easy to carry out in the school.
In accordance with the three points made in the passage, we can powerfully conclude that it is more important for the school to improve the meals rather than their social activities.
作者: wangmenghan123 时间: 2013-5-15 17:44
Should government support artists or should artists support themselves?
The issue that whether the government should fund the artists or not has been a heated topic for the public since it has been raised up. Some supporter express their opinion that often the greatest artists in their time can't be appreciated by the wide public, which lead to the unpopularity of the works and they can depend on the art to make a living, such as Van Gogh, the famous painter who was admitted by years after his death. It is unfair and make other artists very frustrated and unconfident. Nevertheless, as far as I am concerned, the disadvantages of the proposal will outweigh its advantages.
First of all, the government’s basic task and what it promises to the public are to make sure every citizen in this country can meet their basic needs to earn a living. Since there are too many urgent problems, such as the educational facilities for the youth of the country is still in short and thousands of people are unemployed and can't buy enough food to eat or afford an apartment to live in, unsolved in the society, it is improper and cruel to fund the artists to produce their art work, which nearly means nothing to the people who are starving and struggling in the difficult living conditions. This action will further the polarization of the society where the rich can be satisfied with all the needs, physically or psychologically, while the poor attract no attention from the government. And clearly it won't help to build a harmonious and prosperous society.
Moreover, the artists create their work to express their feelings and thoughts about everything, such as the society, the love and the anger, to get appreciation and sense of accomplishment through inspire the same feelings from the audience. They will feel more confident and proud if they earn a living from the income of their artwork because it means more than money but also the confirmation from another individual who share the same feeling and idea rather than depending on the financial assistance from the government. It seems an insult to the artist to accept the mercy from the government and use the taxers' money without their appreciation for their artwork.
Finally, it is exactly the freedom of the expression of the individual artist about what they think and believe about the whole society and the human beings that make these artwork so precious. If the government choose which artist to fund and this would somehow bring the political impact on the artists' work. The pureness of the art can be ruined and it would never be as perfect as it should be. When the artworks become the tools of the government to convey their political ideas, probably the situation of the autocracy government will happen in the future and the democracy nowadays will never exist and they will deprive us of the freedom, which is pursued by everyone. What a disaster it will be!
In accordance to the three points displayed in the passage, we can convincingly conclude that it would be a wiser and more reasonable choice to allow the artists to support themselves rather than supporting by the government.
