(A) merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors
(B) merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting them apart, like nuclear reactors
(C) merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart, as nuclear reactors do
(D) and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in unclear reactors（E）
(E) and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic reactors that split them apart
I don't think E is the best answer. I feel C might be a better answer. Discussions?
I remember seeing this question before, but could remember where. Kaplan? Or Princeton? Or OG? Any pointers? Thanks!
这道题首先有个概念：neuclear fusion和neuclear reactor是两个完全相反的动作。那么C的错误就很明显了，C意味着两个动作相同，都是做A而不是做B。
前几天看到一个NN以此为例说明现在分词的用法，今天又看到其他帖子NN的讨论涉及此题，我产生了一些问题：
1，选E，因为不能表伴随动作。Nuclear fusion is the force that 表示一种事实, merge the nuclei of atoms 表示贯穿全程的动作, 怎么不能同时发生呢？
2，选项C表示nuclear reactors和主句主语执行相同动作。可是as，like放在后面应该是和邻近的部分进行比较吧，这在大全里有明显的例子：
Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
(A) like adults
(B) unlike an adult
(C) as adults
(D) as adults do（D）
(E) as an adult
这里的as adults do明显是和organize而非do not organize进行比较
以上疑惑，望得到NN指点
我认为E还是正确地
在C中，分词是存在修饰不清的问题
但是我同意楼主说得，就是
同时他给出的例题也证明了这一点，也就是说C不存在as的错误
至于Avantasia的问题，我认为搂住给的例子，也可以用来说明，就是
Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
(A) like adults
(B) unlike an adult
(C) as adults
(D) as adults do（D）
(E) as an adult
这里若是像你讲的unlike与最近的名词比较的话，那这个例子也不对，因为最近的名词是their attention or perceptions ，所以，我认为还是与主语相比，只是动词与最近的相比，这也属于你列举的大全中两个与主语相比的例子相同吧
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=108517&page=1
PS:我认为还是要关注一下逻辑意思，单考规则有时确实会陷入语言漩涡
?
Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
(A) like adults
(B) unlike an adult
(C) as adults
(D) as adults do（D）
(E) as an adult
这题选D, 真好验证了由于修饰的歧义, 所以不能选A. 我觉得这个题目如果用like接的话, 比较ETS的方式是:
Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
这题选D, 真好验证了由于修饰的歧义, 所以不能选A. 我觉得这个题目如果用like接的话, 比较ETS的方式是:
Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
我怎么觉得这个有歧异呢
147. Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.
(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than
(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as
(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as
(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than
(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than
In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like .... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be .... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to. Samuel Sewall... was viewed
结构完全相同的句子, 怎么会有歧义?
斑竹举的例子很好，like+n的确是与最接近的名词性成分比较。
至于这道题我认为不选c的原因是主句及其限制性定于从句中均有谓语，那么后面的分词结构会出现修饰对象的模糊。我的结论是comma前的部分谓语不止一个，分词结构就不适合使用。这个观点，请指正。
147. Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.
(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than
(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as
(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as
(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than
(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than
In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like .... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be .... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to. Samuel Sewall... was viewed
结构完全相同的句子, 怎么会有歧义?
你这个例子确实具有代表性，但是我觉得你对那个句子的改法有问题
Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.
前面是because从句，不完整，不能随便用逗号隔开，查了一下， 逗号没有这种用法。
PS:你在4楼想问的是什么问题？
斑竹举的例子很好，like+n的确是与最接近的名词性成分比较。
至于这道题我认为不选c的原因是主句及其限制性定于从句中均有谓语，那么后面的分词结构会出现修饰对象的模糊。我的结论是comma前的部分谓语不止一个，分词结构就不适合使用。这个观点，请指正。
147. Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.
(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than
(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as
(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as
(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than
(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than
In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like .... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be .... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to. Samuel Sewall... was viewed
结构完全相同的句子, 怎么会有歧义?
我也认为没有歧义，但句子的意思被改变了。Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.(Both children and audlts do not....)
原文的意思是children donot...,but audlts do ....，选项D表达了这个意思。
至于大全541C选项，Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs,merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart, as nuclear reactors do。首先，do不知是何什么并列（和powers 还是和merging，还是和splitting），其次，即使do 和power并列，按常识，nuclear reactors 也不可能power the Sun,the stars
请指正。
顶一个，好问。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |