ChaseDream
标题: T-9-Q27. 大全987-606求教~! [打印本页]
作者: yywgmat 时间: 2013-4-17 22:48
标题: T-9-Q27. 大全987-606求教~!
T-9-Q27. 大全987-606 选AResearch during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
Research on the nature of language and the process that produce and make it understandable (it 指代谁??)
A. hat produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
B. of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
C. by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity 改变句子意思了。
D. by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
E. by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
A化简为:Research on the nature of language and the process that produce and make it understandable (it 指代谁??)是nature还是language 我觉得逻辑上应该是language但是语法上却应该是nature??? 难道说我想错了?是想让语言的特性更加understandable??? 求翻译。。。。
作者: bejamin1111 时间: 2013-4-18 18:36
It指代的肯定是language或者nature中的一个,而前者更加符合逻辑意思。我偏向于指代前者。因为语法也是为逻辑服务的。nature of language 相当于language's nature,manhattan sc 5th第72页提到所有格后面的代词一般不能指代像language所处位置的词,不过关于这点是有争议的。gmat并未否认不能指代,只不过gmat不会把这些点作为做题时候的split,说明并不影响做题。
作者: yywgmat 时间: 2013-4-18 21:42
bejamin1111 发表于 2013-4-18 18:36
It指代的肯定是language或者nature中的一个,而前者更加符合逻辑意思。我偏向于指代前者。因为语法也是为逻 ...
谢~!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
作者: 会飞的阿牛 时间: 2013-8-20 16:10
神啊救救我吧
作者: angla 时间: 2014-2-28 11:16
难道 processes的逻辑可以自己produce,而不是by which produce?
C的句意更符合逻辑吧?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |