ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-6-3-1 [打印本页]

作者: cicilla    时间: 2004-12-11 21:46
标题: LSAT-6-3-1

1. Roses always provide a stunning display of color, but only those flowers that smell sweet are worth growing in a garden. Some roses have no scent. Which one the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the passage?


(A) Some flowers which provides a stunning display of color are not worth growing in a garden.


(B) All flowers with no scent provide a stunning display of color.


(c) Some flowers which are worth growing in a garden have no scent.


(D) Some roses which smell sweet are not worth growing in a garden.


(E) No sweet-smelling flower is worth growing in a garden unless it provides a stunning display of color.


A是答案。我也同意。但是D为什么不对呢。从题目看“grow in garden"是"smell sweet"的充分条件,smell sweet是grow in garden的必要条件,那么D说有一些smell sweet的玫瑰不grow in gardent也是可能的啊。


谢谢解答!


作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2004-12-12 04:52
问题是选项是must be true,不是possibly true。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3