11. Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rule.
Which one of the following is principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) Government intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed.
(B) The right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion.
(C) The right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual.
(D) It is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace.（C）
(E) Where the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise.
这道题我读不懂，求各位指点一下，谢了
响应斑竹号召，偶来帮你翻译一下：
现行法律要求商业性私人楼宇设立吸烟者与非吸烟者指定区是对私有部门的侵犯，是不正当的。这里的主要问题并非关于研究所显示的非吸烟者可能受到伤害，而是政府企图制定私有部门政策与法规时对私有商业部门权利的侵犯。
大致是这个意思，题干里有一段好像重复了
Thank you!
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |