ChaseDream

标题: lsat-18-1-11 [打印本页]

作者: entia    时间: 2004-12-8 12:47
标题: lsat-18-1-11

11. The situation has gotten worse. Unless Elizabeth goes I must go. But she will not to if I stay So we will both have to go. What is the flaw in the reasoning above? (A) The first claim, that the situation has gotten worse, is irrelevant. (B) A possible course of action is overlooked (C) It is assumed that staying is the same as not going. (D) The conclusion refers to a possibility that is not explicitly referred to in any of the premises. (E) Insufficient information is given about the circumstances.


这里我选了e我明白b对但是我觉得因为证据和结论之间是需要加一些条件才能达到的,所以我觉得e没有错,有人和我说为什么e错么? 


作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2004-12-9 03:24

原文有两个关系:1。I stay---->E goes。2。I stay---->E not goes。从1,2可以看出I must go。否则1,2会得出矛盾的结果。对于E,可以go 也可以not go。所以B对。也即Information是充分的,只是结果应该有两种,不是一种。故E错






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3